Is the growth in audio streaming reshaping the world of audio equipment manufacturers?

nicoff

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2014
Messages
2,395
ChatGPT Answer:
Yes — quite dramatically. The growth of streaming is not just changing how people consume music; it is restructuring the economics, product strategies, and even survival prospects of audio equipment manufacturers.

A few major shifts are happening simultaneously:

1. Streaming moved the “center of gravity” from hardware to ecosystems

In the CD era, manufacturers differentiated themselves through transports, DACs, amplifiers, and physical media playback. Today, the value increasingly lives in:
  • software
  • app quality
  • streaming integration
  • multi-room ecosystems
  • DSP/room correction
  • voice control
  • convenience
That is why companies like Sonos became so influential. They understood earlier than traditional hi-fi brands that the software experience matters as much as the hardware.

Now companies like WiiM are attacking that same territory with cheaper, more open, and more flexible ecosystems.

2. Streaming is pushing manufacturers toward active speakers and integrated systems

Traditional separates are increasingly a niche product.

Why sell:
  • streamer
  • DAC
  • preamp
  • amplifier
  • cables
…when consumers increasingly want:
  • one app
  • one box
  • wireless speakers
  • HDMI ARC
  • Spotify Connect
  • room correction
That is why many legacy hi-fi brands are suddenly launching:
  • active speakers
  • streaming amps
  • wireless ecosystems
Even historically traditional speaker companies are pivoting.

This is also why you are seeing companies that once made only electronics now moving into speakers:
  • higher margins
  • more audible differentiation
  • stronger brand identity
  • ecosystem lock-in
That trend aligns very closely with your earlier observations about the industry.

3. Streaming accelerated the commoditization of electronics

Streaming exposed something uncomfortable for the traditional audiophile industry:

Once competent DACs and amplifiers became inexpensive and audibly transparent, software and UX started to matter more than boutique electronics.

That opened the door for companies like:
  • Topping
  • SMSL
  • WiiM
These firms deliver:
  • excellent measured performance
  • modern streaming features
  • aggressive pricing
  • fast iteration cycles
Meanwhile many traditional high-end brands still operate with business models built around scarcity, mystique, and dealer networks.

Streaming is making that increasingly difficult.

4. The winners are becoming hybrid “tech + audio” companies

The industry is increasingly rewarding firms that combine:
  • software competence
  • networking
  • DSP
  • industrial design
  • supply chain efficiency
  • cloud/app development
That favors companies with technology DNA more than old-school audiophile culture.

This helps explain:
  • Harman buying Roon Labs
  • the rise of WiiM
  • Sonos’ ecosystem focus
  • active DSP speakers
  • streaming-first products
Roon, for example, is strategically valuable because it sits at the intersection of:
  • streaming
  • metadata
  • discovery
  • multi-room control
  • ecosystem integration
The future battlefield is increasingly software/platform control — not just analog circuitry.

5. Streaming is bifurcating the market

The middle of the market is under the most pressure.

Consumers increasingly choose between:

A. Convenience ecosystem audio

Examples:
  • Sonos
  • Apple
  • WiiM
  • Bose

B. Luxury/status/performance audio

Examples:
  • ultra-high-end speakers
  • statement systems
  • architectural installations
  • design-centric products
The traditional mid-tier “audiophile separates” category is getting squeezed.

That is one reason many high-end brands are moving upscale with:
  • six-figure speakers
  • luxury branding
  • exotic materials
  • lifestyle positioning
while budget tech-focused firms attack from below.

6. Streaming also changed what consumers value

Younger listeners often prioritize:
  • discovery
  • playlists
  • convenience
  • whole-home audio
  • integration
  • industrial design
over:
  • physical media
  • tweak culture
  • cable rolling
  • rack systems
That cultural shift may be even more important than the technical one.

The modern consumer expects:
  • instant access to millions of tracks
  • seamless control from a phone
  • synchronization across rooms
  • low friction
Streaming normalized that expectation.

Ironically, streaming may also have weakened some traditional audiophile claims.

When consumers can instantly compare tracks, systems, DSP settings, or gear from a phone app, it becomes harder to sustain mystique around tiny hardware differences. Meanwhile, room correction and DSP often produce larger audible improvements than many traditional “audiophile tweaks.”

That is probably one reason the industry conversation increasingly revolves around:
  • speakers
  • DSP
  • active systems
  • ecosystems
  • software
instead of exotic DAC chips or cables.
 
You need to understand AI. It's not exactly objective and feeds off what you put into it. You forgot to edit, "That trend aligns very closely with your earlier observations about the industry."

Any of us who have read your posts realize you have an agenda. I don't disagree with all in the post but it's definitely biased.

Saying the industry changed due to streaming is like saying the industry changed due to the CD player. Of course, there's going to be companies to supply and make money from new technology.
 
You need to understand AI. It's not exactly objective and feeds off what you put into it. You forgot to edit, "That trend aligns very closely with your earlier observations about the industry."

Any of us who have read your posts realize you have an agenda. I don't disagree with all in the post but it's definitely biased.

Saying the industry changed due to streaming is like saying the industry changed due to the CD player. Of course, there's going to be companies to supply and make money from new technology.
IMO the Ai-generated response is quite accurate in describing how streaming has changed audio.

And while some folks still prefer physical media, the money has moved toward streaming.

I am surprised how WiiM, a 14 year old privately-held American company has become a leader in the development of a new streaming ecosystem.

I can see a similarity between the old established audio manufacturers and the old guard auto manufacturers. They know how to build audio equipment/cars, but they are struggling with the software and integration of the new technologies.
 
I think it’s more interesting to describe how streaming changed your personal listening experience and system hardware and software. For me personally streaming is just another audio source. I built a computer music ecosystem in the early 2000’s, mostly to enable an iPod-based portable music system for travel. I ripped all my CD’s to hard drives on my PC. Somewhere along the line I purchased my first DAC to improve the sonics of an aging CD player. It was easy to hook up a (very) long optical cable from my PC to the stereo. BOOM, my entire CD library at my fingertips using a Remote Desktop setup. The CD player got dusty.

When CD quality streaming became available via Tidal and Qobuz things accelerated. I picked up ROON, built a NUC to run ROCK, moved the CD collection to a NAS, and bought my first streamer (aka Digital to Digital converter).

Optical breaks, USB de-crappifiers, linear power supplies and all manner of audiophile nervousa, along with a sequence of DAC and streamer upgrades improved the sound dramatically. Now my digital chain finally sounds great. It took a lot of experimenting and chasing rabbits down holes.
 
Streaming kind of ended the CD vs Vinyl debate didn’t it? Remember that one?

Streaming came along at the right time for a demographic dealing with health issues.

Maybe not “perfect sound forever”, but certainly perfect timing.

CD player sales have been on a steady decline while network streamers (Aurender, Pink Faun, etc) and network related devices - network filters, switches and Ethernet cables have been on rapid ascent in sales.

We still sell about 40-50 turntables and 200 cartridges a month however.
 
Its amazing how quickly we humans can take things for granted. To my ears, my vinyl rig sounds (a little) better than streaming. But I'll bet a lot of us grew up in the 60s saving up $4 to buy a record maybe once a month to get the two good songs we really wanted. Can you imagine if someone had told us then that we could have immediate access to millions of songs played back at high quality for $15 a month? Its a little better deal than the Columbia Record Club.
 
It’s amazing how quickly we humans can take things for granted. To my ears, my vinyl rig sounds (a little) better than streaming. But I'll bet a lot of us grew up in the 60s saving up $4 to buy a record maybe once a month to get the two good songs we really wanted. Can you imagine if someone had told us then that we could have immediate access to millions of songs played back at high quality for $15 a month? It’s a little better deal than the Columbia Record Club.
We’re the same generation that sat around for hours waiting for that song to come on the radio so you could record it.
 
For me streaming is not the ultimate way of listening.

A bought album is listened over and over. Some where good after the first time listening, but got bored on the long term. Others are like a bottle of wine, the time makes it better. The latter one has a problem with streaming, you want good music instantly and when it doesn't you won't give it another chance, instead of letting the time work, you pick another album. This is the reason I like to turn back to a few hundred of albums on physical media I really enjoy.
 
IMO the Ai-generated response is quite accurate in describing how streaming has changed audio.

And while some folks still prefer physical media, the money has moved toward streaming.

I am surprised how WiiM, a 14 year old privately-held American company has become a leader in the development of a new streaming ecosystem.

I can see a similarity between the old established audio manufacturers and the old guard auto manufacturers. They know how to build audio equipment/cars, but they are struggling with the software and integration of the new technologies.

Wiim is technically a U.S. company but their products are made in China. Roon is a U.S. company, although now owned by Samsung.

I'd agree most high end brands are behind on making their own streamers and software. Streaming is an ad-on source which was handled very well for the high end by the likes of Aurender, Lumin and Innuous. Many of them are catching up if they choose to enter that arena. Some companies stay away from sources or DAC's all together.

Wiim makes the cheapest streamer out there although Fozi is hot on their heels, it doesn't make them good. I can get music from a table radio doesn't mean it's the same as a high quality system. I suspect Wiim couldn't compete with the likes of Aurender or Lumin so saw a niche at the dirt cheap point. Many folks with entry level systems or wanted to get into streaming for cheap jumped on Wiim. Wiim offers many bells & whistles for them to play with. When your system sounds good you don't need bass boost or DSP settings for all kinds of genres of music. That's A/V receiver stuff. It's your thing that's fine but those whose focus is on sound quality if they take the time to compare will find better sound can be had with better streamers.

I don't want to get off on a tandgent your analogy using cars is off the mark.
 
For me streaming is not the ultimate way of listening.

A bought album is listened over and over. Some where good after the first time listening, but got bored on the long term. Others are like a bottle of wine, the time makes it better. The latter one has a problem with streaming, you want good music instantly and when it doesn't you won't give it another chance, instead of letting the time work, you pick another album. This is the reason I like to turn back to a few hundred of albums on physical media I really enjoy.

If I find an album I like on Tidal I just add it to my library. It depends on how much I like it and my mood it will get played again. I own and have access to a lot of music yet sometimes don't know what I want to listen to, LOL Unfortunately I do get lazy and sometimes will hit a playlist.
 
Its amazing how quickly we humans can take things for granted. To my ears, my vinyl rig sounds (a little) better than streaming. But I'll bet a lot of us grew up in the 60s saving up $4 to buy a record maybe once a month to get the two good songs we really wanted. Can you imagine if someone had told us then that we could have immediate access to millions of songs played back at high quality for $15 a month? Its a little better deal than the Columbia Record Club.

It's crazy how many albums I own that may have only the one or two good songs. That's why I have to laugh at those who say they listen to the entire album that's the way the artist intended for it to be heard. Well the artist should have made a completely quality album, LOL On the other hand many of them have been purchased based off the song on the radio, you took the chance on the album and it was great. It was a gamble back then.
 
Back
Top