Interview with Leading Coronavirus Expert To Confirm The Origin Of COVID-19

Status
Not open for further replies.
94976273_10158270959797618_2198419035257831424_n.jpg





.
 
It's an educational video.

Le me guess: Not all minds agree, not all opinions are the same, the thread is different than what it used to be. Knowing is not wanting to know what's above the deepest secrets on the other side of black holes. To go there is to never return to this side of what is called " normal life" ... as we know it.

I like that interview; he simply confirmed what the top scientists all said.
There were some positive posts in this thread; they didn't have to go, in my sincere opinion.
The rest is unimportant; smart people simply jump over as if it never happened, as if totally invisible.
 
High fidelity stereo sounds so much better in a Coronavirus-free environment ...
It's like removing a dark black thick veil in front to breathe freely through the ears of an audiophile born under a full moon ... in an analog world ... from analog recorded tapes ... the originals ... unmanipulated, unexorcised. ... Like being almost there in time and space.
 
NorthStar said:
High fidelity stereo sounds so much better in a Coronavirus-free environment ...
It's like removing a dark black thick veil in front to breathe freely through the ears of an audiophile born under a full moon ... in an analog world ... from analog recorded tapes ... the originals ... unmanipulated, unexorcised. ... Like being almost there in time and space.
Click to expand...

Almost like MQA II


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Dr. Kim estimates that the Covid 19 mortality rate is 2%. That's probably too high. There have been many studies that take asymptomatic cases into account and estimate that the actual mortality rate is probably between 0.1% to 0.5%. The results from Iceland show that 2% is too high. Iceland has tested more people per capita than any other country. They have confirmed 1802 cases and have had 10 deaths, indicating that the mortality rate is probably less than 0.55%. The mortality rate is probably lower than that, since they still only tested about 15% of the population and probably missed some (many?) asymptomatic cases.
 
infonut said:
The results from Iceland show that 2% is too high. Iceland has tested more people per capita than any other country. They have confirmed 1802 cases and have had 10 deaths, indicating that the mortality rate is probably less than 0.55%. The mortality rate is probably lower than that, since they still only tested about 15% of the population and probably missed some (many?) asymptomatic cases.
Click to expand...


Data from places like Iceland (population 364K) are very different in comparison to other places with higher population densities. New Zealand with similar land size is about 5 million. Both these countries are still very sparsely populated in comparison to similarly sized South Korea which has a population of about 50 million.


.
 
Nikhil said:
Data from places like Iceland (population 364K) are very different in comparison to other places with higher population densities. New Zealand with similar land size is about 5 million. Both these countries are still very sparsely populated in comparison to similarly sized South Korea which has a population of about 50 million.


.
Click to expand...

Population density can affect the infection rate, but it should not affect the mortality rate (percent of people who die who have the virus).
 
Will have to take another look at the interview but there are two mortality rates - the Crude Mortality Rate (the number of reported deaths divided by the reported cases) which is 3-4% and Infection Mortality Rate (the number of reported deaths divided by the number of infections) which is lower.

Here is data from New York as of May (and other places as you scroll below):
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-death-rate/




.
 
It is quite possible that the population density can effect the mortality rate. I have seen some talk that the amount of virus that one is exposed to matters. If the exposure is small, the body may be better able to fight off the infection. If one is exposed to a large amount of the virus it can more easily overwhelm the body’s defenses and lead to more deaths. I would argue that in the more densely populated areas, like NYC for example, one is more likely to come in contact with a larger amount of the virus then say, some small town, hence one would expect a higher rate of mortality. With my wife having been to Iceland and my having been to New Zealand, given the population densities in each place, it would make sense, given the thesis above, that the death rates would be lower there on a percentage basis. With this virus, I would be careful reading too much into some of the numbers, as their is a lot we need to learn about it.
 
well explained.
i also think high percentage of active cases with high density population have theyr synergy.
all the aerosols in a sky scratcher....
 
JWhip said:
It is quite possible that the population density can effect the mortality rate. I have seen some talk that the amount of virus that one is exposed to matters. If the exposure is small, the body may be better able to fight off the infection. If one is exposed to a large amount of the virus it can more easily overwhelm the body’s defenses and lead to more deaths. I would argue that in the more densely populated areas, like NYC for example, one is more likely to come in contact with a larger amount of the virus then say, some small town, hence one would expect a higher rate of mortality. With my wife having been to Iceland and my having been to New Zealand, given the population densities in each place, it would make sense, given the thesis above, that the death rates would be lower there on a percentage basis. With this virus, I would be careful reading too much into some of the numbers, as their is a lot we need to learn about it.
Click to expand...


NYC mortality rate is from applied negligence and incompetence, when the dust settles Cuomo will have to answer ...!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top