The blurb I read said they would make the transition in October. Can anyone confirm this?
I would allow them to price gear lower and make more profit but I doubt that they would lower prices. They better have a good return policy.
This is a company that has been around for a long time. I would imagine their dealer network is fairly large? Typical dealer discount is around 40%. I wonder if this is directly related to profits or poor support by dealers? I have heard about a couple guys buying the $5000 plus DAC for mid $3K. Don't know if that was widespread.
They are dealing with a new storm around acid and corrosion on the BHK300’s I understand. Not good. Neither is passing DC from the amp to the speakers. Good luck.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Hi Mike,
This is the first I am hearing of this. I see no mention of this in the PS Audio forums. My BHK 300’s work just fine.![]()
They deleted it. Thankfully one of our members has screen shots.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Neither is passing DC from the amp to the speakers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It was all about heavy discounting/resale by internet dealers. A problem they created themselves IMO. This is a dumb decision. What they should have done was cleaned up the dealer network, stuck with B&M dealers only and implemented a policy around discounting. But the genie was already out of the bottle and blowing up the house was their idea to fix it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Thanks Mike..... I sure would like to see those screen shots.
The explanation is mighty confusing. If I understood this right, these BHK amps with the at-risk bottom plates were built for 2 months and shipped to customers. The one that was first discovered corroded was built in 7/2015 being "right in the first month". Yet they say, those that were built in 8/2015 are fine (being the 2nd month). It just doesn't add up. If 7/2015 was the first month, then 8/2015 would be the second month, so the builds that should be OK would be from 9/2015, surely?
And for those who didn't see the photos on the PS Audio Community forums, it wasn't just corrosion between the plates, it seemed that sections of metal were simply missing, all corroded away in to nothing. The explanation has come a long way since originally saying it was only minor zinc plating bleed-through, to then accusing the owner of sabotaging his own amps with acid to make them look bad, to admitting they'd known for four years that a batch of bottom plates weren't made right by the sub-contractor and two months worth of production with bad plates shipped out the door. And all of those built with bad plates are still out there in the wild.
Hi Brodric...in answer to your 1st paragraph I think Paul McGowan might have miss printed August 2015 and should be starting September of 2015.
As for the 2nd paragraph I would hope that PSA would do the right thing and recall the units built in the 1st 2 months of production. I have to say that PSA is tops when it comes to customer service so I’m sure they will make good.