Gibson Brands Files for Bankruptcy

https://www.strata-gee.com/gibson-brands-files-bankruptcy/#more-17550

Audio brands include: KRK Systems, TASCAM, Cerwin-Vega!, Stanton, Integra, TEAC, TASCAM Professional Software, and Esoteric.

Today’s music is not what it was growing up in the 70s and 80s, and even more so before that period of time, instruments seem to be taking it on the chin.

Gibson was reporting sales of 170,000 guitars a year worldwide - that’s still a lot of guitars.

Since the bank is so nervous they typically decide to implement payment penalties in hard times versus helping find a solution for both parties. I’m sure at one point the bank was proud to tout Gibson as a client, and now Guitar Center is next?

Paul Allen would be a perfect fit to come in and buy the banks notes at a discount, kicking them to the curb and oversee a positive turnaround, however, with this education is key and it begins back in schools.

Gibson is a part of American culture and must be saved.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Thanks to Paul Allen we still have this guitar to lust over.
 

Attachments

  • 15541577_1230292197016950_1641353994129617725_n.jpg
    15541577_1230292197016950_1641353994129617725_n.jpg
    66.2 KB · Views: 25
My reading of the article is that they aren't kaput, but (orderly) restructuring to survive. Seemingly by reverting to core products, like Gibson guitars and musical instruments.
What this means for the other companies under the umbrella like KRK and Teac, etc, well....
 
Also read in some more serious business outlet that they are in chapter 11, which is protection from creditors to re-organize. That said, there is never a guarantee a solution is found.

But I did not know that TEAC and Esoteric belong to the same group. To me it looks like a diversified portfolio of no-growth businesses.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Classic case of a mismanaged business that was headed up by a CEO who lost his way and began empire building in non-core areas (consumer electronics!) levering up the firm while doing so. Beyond all that, the CEO, Henry Juszkiewicz, was a micro-manager and complete odd ball, alienating employees and key retail relationships alike. The ironic thing is that he was part of a consortium of buyers in the mid-1980s of Gibson when it was in a similar bad way financially (which is why he owned 37% of the company prior to the Chapter 11) and he actually turned it around and reverted attention on building quality guitars, invested in making the Epiphone entry-level brand more consistent, quality wise, etc...in the past 5- to 10-years he went on this buying binge of life-style consumer electronic assets and in the meantime took his eye off the core business. Quality at Gibson has become more erratic, the kiss of death for a premium brand that was predicated on delivering high quality instruments to its customers!

In a Chapter 11 reorg, the creditors (which in this case are distressed debt hedge fund investors, including a subsidiary of KKR which is a large PE shop) come in and take ownership of the equity (so the existing equity holders including Juskiewicz get wiped out) and they have extended $135 in DIP (debtor in possession) financing to allow the company to continue to operate during the reorg. The core brands that will stay with Gibson are Gibson and Epiphone guitars, as well as KRK pro audio gear and Cerwin Vega (pro and consumer audio). All the other brands will be auctioned off to raise capital to help with refinancing the existing $500 mill debt that is in default as well as the new $135 mill DIP financing, along with restructuring (taking out operating costs at Gibson). Right now Juskiewicz has a one-year deal to stay on as CEO/advisor through the transition until the creditors/new owners find a replacement for him that they can operationally turn around the core guitar business.

I forget whether it was the S&P or Moody’s Credit Analyst that Said in his report the core Gibson guitar business (which is a $1bn+ revenue business) is reasonably healthy and could be quite a profitable business if managed well and if it did not have to pay the interest expense associated with the debt raised to finance a lot of these non-core acquisitions. Also the creditors, do not want to put any incremental investment dollars in the re-orged Gibson until Juskiewicz is no longer there and his replacement is in full control.

Classic case of an iconic brand run into the ground by incompetence. Now it’s up to new owners and management to revive this tarnished iconic american brand, and if they do it right, they will earn a nice return on their investment.
 
I read an article a little while ago about the decline of guitar sales. Not nearly as many guitar heros as there used to be, people are not buying guitars like they used to. Let me find the link.
 

Yes...not a growth industry for sure but not the issue here. Gibson generated over $1.0bn in revenue from selling guitars (170K guitars) and generated well over $150 million in EBIT (operating profit). It’s once you layer in interest expense from debt they raised to fund their expansion into hifi/lifestyle audio businesses that they bought, and layer on top of that the working capital (inventory draw on cash flow along with negative trade terms in terms of payables vs receivables days) that put them into a liquidity crunch and in default of key covenants on their bank loans.
 
Yes...not a growth industry for sure but not the issue here. Gibson generated over $1.0bn in revenue from selling guitars (170K guitars) and generated well over $150 million in EBIT (operating profit). It’s once you layer in interest expense from debt they raised to fund their expansion into hifi/lifestyle audio businesses that they bought, and layer on top of that the working capital (inventory draw on cash flow along with negative trade terms in terms of payables vs receivables days) that put them into a liquidity crunch and in default of key covenants on their bank loans.

Spot on in my opinion
 
Sorry...above should say $40mill not $150 million. Just saw another article that basically referenced them making $11mill in EBITDA in Q4 2017 in the core guitar business, so annualize that and assume Q4 is generally seasonally stronger than other quarters and we’ll call it $40 mill a year.
 
Back
Top