Full set of ... Siltech Triple Crown

[Mike]

I agree with most of what you said. Cables represent legitimate tuning options. I don't agree with your assessment of Kimber Select. Neutral is not how I would describe it. In fact I don't like anything about it.

I didn't like what Siltech did in my system. As you suggested, it changed the sound significantly and not for the better. It was a bit of a dog's breakfast, actually--it projected at certain frequencies, receded at others and I found it both glary and bright.

I use Transparent XL Reference MM2.

Transparent? EQ Boxes with cheap connectors? Oh boy. Not a fan.

 

[kevinkwann]

Transparent? EQ Boxes with cheap connectors? Oh boy. Not a fan.

Fair enough. But I might suggest that when you hear dramatic differences between one cable and most of the rest, the one that sounds the most different is the most colored.

 

[Stringreen]

I don't agree. Cables are not tone controls. They should be transparent (the cable manufacturer calls theirs Transparent because they know the goal) By tampering with the original signal, you distroy phasing, frequency response, dynamics, etc...all or some of these. If one's system is not doing what one wants, instead of band-aids, a change of component should be sought. This entry is made not to condemn the original poster, but to advise on readers of these pages.

 

[kevinkwann]

I don't agree. Cables are not tone controls. They should be transparent (the cable manufacturer calls theirs Transparent because they know the goal) By tampering with the original signal, you distroy phasing, frequency response, dynamics, etc...all or some of these. If one's system is not doing what one wants, instead of band-aids, a change of component should be sought. This entry is made not to condemn the original poster, but to advise on readers of these pages.

They "should be transparent." However, they are not. Otherwise I agree with every single point you made.

I use Transparent because it has less of a sonic fingerprint than anything I've tried. Siltech on the other hand has more of a sonic fingerprint than most everything I've tried. To be fair, however, I haven't tried everything.

 

[MDP]

I agree with most of what you said. Cables represent legitimate tuning options. I don't agree with your assessment of Kimber Select. Neutral is not how I would describe it. In fact I don't like anything about it.

I didn't like what Siltech did in my system. As you suggested, it changed the sound significantly and not for the better. It was a bit of a dog's breakfast, actually--it projected at certain frequencies, receded at others and I found it both glary and bright.

I use Transparent XL Reference MM2.

It would be informative if you listed your system components so that we can better understand your opinions.

 

[BlueFox]

Like everything else in this hobby, personal preference is the name of the game, and the sky is the limit when it comes time to purchase. My opinion is what comes out of a cable should be the same as what went into the cable. If the cable can also filter noise then that is a plus. The engineer in me thinks it is a lost cause using a cable to tune gear. The obvious drawback to the tuning philosophy is you need to change cables whenever you change gear.

I like that I can add new gear and know that it will work at its potential right from the start, or at least after it breaks in. Still, I would love to be able to try the high-end cables just to satisfy my own curiosity. I can accept that the sound might change, but am curious as to how much.

 

[Steve]

I've actually compared Siltech Royal Signature to Shunyata Zitron Anaconda power and signal. There is no contest. Siltech misses nothing. Smooth as. Music just glides mystically around you.

Siltech Royal Signature power cables have ZERO emissions. PERFECT FOR TUBE AMPLIFIERS and other sensitive equipment. The Ruby Mountain II power my MC2301s. It's a beautiful marriage with Furutech Flux terminations and and Flux-50 inline power filters.

I've also A/B Furutech Lineflux XLR vs Siltech i770 RCA. Not exactly fair to compare balanced vs unbalanced with the XLR winning out on resolution. The RCA had more of a laid back soundstage. When switching between the two, the Siltech was favoured for its overall presentation. The XLR equivalent i770 would probably best the Lineflux. The Royal Signature Princess certainly would.

I would really love to swap out my WireWorld Platinum Eclipse G7 XLR (from pre to amp) with Siltech Royal Signature Queen or better. Sure the flagship WireWorld is a great cable but it is not as good as Siltech. I need to find a 2m pair for the right price. Open to invitation.

 

[FlexibleAudio]

I don't agree. Cables are not tone controls. They should be transparent (the cable manufacturer calls theirs Transparent because they know the goal) By tampering with the original signal, you distroy phasing, frequency response, dynamics, etc...all or some of these. If one's system is not doing what one wants, instead of band-aids, a change of component should be sought. This entry is made not to condemn the original poster, but to advise on readers of these pages.

Cables should be what ever the buyer wants them to be. Among other things, they most certainly are tone controls. The industry is largely based on the concept that cables represent the spice rack of the kitchen. I am guessing you meant to express your comments as your personal preference for cables, which BTW is very similar to mine.

 

[Steve]

I don't agree. Cables are not tone controls. They should be transparent (the cable manufacturer calls theirs Transparent because they know the goal) By tampering with the original signal, you distroy phasing, frequency response, dynamics, etc...all or some of these. If one's system is not doing what one wants, instead of band-aids, a change of component should be sought. This entry is made not to condemn the original poster, but to advise on readers of these pages.

Stringreen....You have some valid points but rather than get into a heated discussion about the merits of wire and its various representations, I will state the importance of quality metallurgy, geometry and material composition. Siltech is one of those no compromise brands when it comes to their composition and construction. They use a true to form, straight through conventional cable philosophy with no passive electronics or networking in between. There is no pseudo-science but rather real material science as adopted by the aerospace industry.

 

[SoundRebels]

OK, It's time for another nice delivery (2 x RCA IC's with autograph) :-D

 

[TommyC]

Does the Triple Crown have power cord?

 

[SoundRebels]

Does the Triple Crown have power cord?

Not yet

 

[Steve]

Triple Crown Power Cable...Here it is! -->

 

[Eli08]

So any feedback? How are you configuring the grounds on the cables? Have you tried different alternatives? I have the int3erconnects and the speaker cables. So far I find greater improvement in the interconnects. Which are massive BTW

 

[joeinid]

Welcome to the forum Eli08, thank you for joining.

 

[Eli08]

Hi Joe. Good to see you. Thanks for the welcome

 

[Mike]

Siltech is my favorite cable by far. They can transform and elevate a system to a whole new level. My Royal Prince cables are incredible.

 

[Steve]

My MC2301s would love a pair of 2m XLR Royal Signature Queen or better. erfect:

 

[SoundRebels]

Siltech Triple Crown English review is ready - link

 

[mep]

Siltech is my favorite cable by far. They can transform and elevate a system to a whole new level. My Royal Prince cables are incredible.

How do the Duchess of York cables sound?