With MIT cables the signal IS directly connected to the load with ZERO breaks in the wires. The LCR networks are all connected in parallel. These networks deliver additional “in phase” power to the load. Bruce uses the LCR networks to extend and flatten the articulation response of the cable.
That is some nice wordsmithing, isn’t it? Although it’s an old marketing trick to make up pseudo-scientific gobbledygook trying to impress people, knowing that many will not ask what it actually means for not to embarrass themselves. I doubt anyone would use that in high end audio though [emoji15].
I just wonder, is there is an actual meaning to these in the Queen’s English?
- zero breaks in the wires?
- LCR networks all connected in parallel?
- additional power to the load?
- flatten articulation response?
Here’s an attempt:
- zero breaks in the wires? - My cables also come in a one-piece strand, that is generally a good idea when attempting to transport a signal in pure form.
- LCR networks all connected in parallel? - Please explain ‘network’ in this context - rest assured I can follow any explanation about signaling after 1 1/2 decades in telecoms. What is the ‘network’ here? I wonder if it is any good for preserving the original signal if it is diverted or bouncing around inside these boxes the cables run through.
- additional power to the load? - Ever heard of the second law of thermodynamics? It also works reciprocally. Energy never disappears, it can only change form. Similarly energy never just emerges from thin air either.
- flatten articulation response? Sounds like the signal is reduced in the process, not sure I want that. So far I have been paying ridiculous amounts of money to avoid that.
Humor me.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk