Fast solid state amplifier suggestiontions / recommendations

AJ Soundfield said:
The Bruno Putzey designed Hypex NCores are the best SOTA Class D on the market today IMO.
Rowland, Merrill, Nord, et al
An "amplifier", vs a special effects processor...if that is one's goal. Transparent and very powerful into any reasonable load.
Click to expand...

+1
 
I love my Ayre R Twenty combo. I've never heard Soulution or CH precision. I have heard Audionet and was not crazy about it - just not my taste, I prefer sweeter/warmer gear. I am not sure I'd consider Ayre fast, but to my ear, it is on the slightly sweet/warmer side with an amazing balance of solid state and tubes without any tube drawbacks.

mdp632 said:
Should I also consider Ayre Acoustics ?
Click to expand...
 
I've auditioned the CH gear, Solution, Audionet and own Ayre. Of the gear I listed I'd probably break them down like this:
Ayre
Solution
Audionet
CH (not my favorite at all, but many love them)

I'd own any of the top three I think. I also feel that you can have speed AND musicality and micro/macro detail. That's why I love Ayre. I think it's one of the best buys in audio in each of it's price ranges. I also really have enjoyed Dan Dagistino's new amps, but haven't heard them on speakers I love. Hard to fully tell.

I have had Spectral in my system for a long time in the past. I always felt it was a bit cold. I had a pair of MIT 770 MH that was tuned to my tube amps. It's the same wire they use for the Spectral gear. It's a great cable and I recently sold it to a happy buyer. I personally feel that if any component is known for any one or two things, that it's not great.

That's just me. The only way to know what to put in the system if obviously listening. Trust your ear and not our ears. We all hear differently and love what WE love or know.
 
Ctsooner said:
I've auditioned the CH gear, Solution, Audionet and own Ayre. Of the gear I listed I'd probably break them down like this:
Ayre
Solution
Audionet
CH (not my favorite at all, but many love them)

I'd own any of the top three I think. I also feel that you can have speed AND musicality and micro/macro detail. That's why I love Ayre. I think it's one of the best buys in audio in each of it's price ranges. I also really have enjoyed Dan Dagistino's new amps, but haven't heard them on speakers I love. Hard to fully tell.

I have had Spectral in my system for a long time in the past. I always felt it was a bit cold. I had a pair of MIT 770 MH that was tuned to my tube amps. It's the same wire they use for the Spectral gear. It's a great cable and I recently sold it to a happy buyer. I personally feel that if any component is known for any one or two things, that it's not great.

That's just me. The only way to know what to put in the system if obviously listening. Trust your ear and not our ears. We all hear differently and love what WE love or know.
Click to expand...

Thanks but have you heard any of the modern/ current spectral gear ? If so how would you rank against those brands in your list ?
 
mdp632 said:
Thanks but have you heard any of the modern/ current spectral gear ? If so how would you rank against those brands in your list ?
Click to expand...

At Overture and Goodwin's. I still feel it's a bit cold for ME. Others feel that it's the fastest amp etc...I personally don't hear that. I do hear an amp that leaves me a bit cold. I would probably say:
Ayre
Solution
Audionet
Spectral
CH

Other will list totally differently. I'm highly opinionated as most who read my posts know, but at least I get out and listen to a ton of gear. I also speak with a lot of dealers over the US and hear them complain about the quality of some of the companies out there. I have been in three different dealers over the last two years and have seen some of the top rated and selling pieces in for repairs. From digital to amps. Different reasons, so it scares me IRT quality control. Companies may have a bad run due to a bad cap or display, but they will take care of that quickly and quietly if they are a strong company, but when you see all different problems you get concerned. I have also looked into the quality of a component and not just because it has a really nice case etc... Just look on the net and listen, but ask the dealers what they would own and keep an open mind. I did that when I wanted to change over to SS a few years ago and I can't do tubes anymore even though I love so many tube designed gear.
 
Ctsooner said:
I also feel that you can have speed AND musicality and micro/macro detail. That's why I love Ayre. I think it's one of the best buys in audio in each of it's price ranges.
Click to expand...

Feel the same way about Ayre, quite a good blend of musicality, speed and definition.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Kuoppis said:
Feel the same way about Ayre, quite a good blend of musicality, speed and definition.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I noticed you also own a Pass INT-60. How would you compare the Ayre sound to the Pass? Btw, I also have the INT-60 but, looking for something different as initial post stated.

Thanks
 
mdp632 said:
I noticed you also own a Pass INT-60. How would you compare the Ayre sound to the Pass? Btw, I also have the INT-60 but, looking for something different as initial post stated.

Thanks
Click to expand...

Looking forward to this answer. I have spent a fair amount of time with the Pass integrated amps and have my own impression (mostly positive).
 
I think he was wanting to know how the sound of Ayre compares to the Pass int. I'm interested myself, I got the impression they were similar in character. My prior amp was Pass and although they weren't slow they seem to be more polite and rounded in leading edges compared to my current Levinson. I am drawn to the rhythm so I like drums to have good transient and snap. Not to the point of being aggressive or loss of rhythm, pace.

Ctsooner said:
Looking forward to this answer. I have spent a fair amount of time with the Pass integrated amps and have my own impression (mostly positive).
Click to expand...
 
I'm a former drummer, so I understand what you like to hear believe me. I too find the Pass gear a bit too dark for my tastes long term. I don't know if they are slow, but they do round out things a bit for my tastes. Many folks say he makes tube like SS, but to me that's not what it really is, it's just a bit dark and rounded. Personally, I like it much better than some of the other stuff that's hyper etched etc... This is one reason I love the Ayre gear. I also like many other pieces of SS gear that I've heard, but all of it is much more expensive than the Ayre in various sound points..
 
mdp632 said:
I noticed you also own a Pass INT-60. How would you compare the Ayre sound to the Pass? Btw, I also have the INT-60 but, looking for something different as initial post stated.
Click to expand...

What I experienced when I had the INT in my main system, was that the detailed character of an Ayre pre went quite well with Pass.

Pass is not the fastest gear around, but at least the .8 series do have tons of top end resolution and IMHO offer completely unreal sound staging and very nice bass definition. I could imagine trying out the X350.8 in my system. Might be a lots of fun.

Comparing that to the Ayre Twenty series, I think Ayre is a bit snappier and has very good micro detail retrieval. To hear this try e.g. Melody Gardot/ Worrisome Heart, the first 30 sec or so. Piano definition and the stand-up bass entering at 17 sec is excellent, has also something to do with the micro derail retrieval. E.g. in this piece the Ayre excels delivering very good PRaT, which is essential to balance out the otherwise mellow character of the song.

What you also need to take in consideration is the impact of power. Raw power does also enable speed, as the amp needs to work less to deliver it. The INT-60 is nice for a small setup and that's where it performs at its best. It is however not designed to deliver an orchestral performance with full range LS in a large room. That's what I will try the 350 wpc monster big brother for.

But beware, these differences are rather subtle - and I do enjoy both brands.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
Kuoppis said:
What I experienced when I had the INT in my main system, was that the detailed character of an Ayre pre went quite well with Pass.

Pass is not the fastest gear around, but at least the .8 series do have tons of top end resolution and IMHO offer completely unreal sound staging and very nice bass definition. I could imagine trying out the X350.8 in my system. Might be a lots of fun.

Comparing that to the Ayre Twenty series, I think Ayre is a bit snappier and has very good micro detail retrieval. To hear this try e.g. Melody Gardot/ Worrisome Heart, the first 30 sec or so. Piano definition and the stand-up bass entering at 17 sec is excellent, has also something to do with the micro derail retrieval. E.g. in this piece the Ayre excels delivering very good PRaT, which is essential to balance out the otherwise mellow character of the song.

What you also need to take in consideration is the impact of power. Raw power does also enable speed, as the amp needs to work less to deliver it. The INT-60 is nice for a small setup and that's where it performs at its best. It is however not designed to deliver an orchestral performance with full range LS in a large room. That's what I will try the 350 wpc monster big brother for.

But beware, these differences are rather subtle - and I do enjoy both brands.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Click to expand...


Thanks for sharing. I agree I do enjoy the .8 series for the reason you mentioned above. I'm just looking to audition brands that have a little bit more "jump" so to say. I said speed because when I listened to those Spectral electronics... Well everything seemed more accurate and neutral e.g. Nothing in particular stood out as it was all equal good..It was able to open up the recording so to say. It has a very fast attack and decay...drums etc were faster and more precise than other brands I've heard so far.

I do prefer an integrated amplifier which leaves out Spectral. But, I'll be sure to check out the Ayre products after some of the positive comments here.
 
mdp632 said:
Thanks for sharing. I agree I do enjoy the .8 series for the reason you mentioned above. I'm just looking to audition brands that have a little bit more "jump" so to say. I said speed because when I listened to those Spectral electronics... Well everything seemed more accurate and neutral e.g. Nothing in particular stood out as it was all equal good..It was able to open up the recording so to say. It has a very fast attack and decay...drums etc were faster and more precise than other brands I've heard so far.

I do prefer an integrated amplifier which leaves out Spectral. But, I'll be sure to check out the Ayre products after some of the positive comments here.
Click to expand...

Check out this integrated:

http://www.ta-hifi.de/en/audiosystems/hv-series/pa-3100-hv-integrated-amplifier/
 
Penthouse-D said:
I think I read somewhere, Magico showed the new S-3II powered by Spectral in Munch. First time I've read about this pairing….
Click to expand...

That's correct, there was a Spectral + S3 mk2 demo in Munich.

Magico used to demo with Spectral before the currently used Constellation and Solution amps. But there is not so much happening lately related to Spectral.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top