Esoteric K-03XS

hongkong

Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2015
Messages
357
Location
FRANCE
Hello,
I have an Esoteric K-03XS, it works very good...
I don't believe what I listen...
Warm and analytic !!! How they do that ?
 
Hello,
I have an Esoteric K-03XS, it works very good...
I don't believe what I listen...
Warm and analytic !!! How they do that ?

The sum of all parts. One mans warmth is another mans distortion.

One mans analytic is another mans term for detail and resolution.

Enjoy keep us posted. I’m also interested in the new XS players.
 
The XS players share the same AKM chip as the Grandioso K1. This might contribute to some of the improvements over 03X.

Other than the DAC chip; I'm not sure what other improvements over the XS have over the X players.
 
I have listen the K03X in my home.
I have the Marantz SA7S1.
The K03X is above the SA7S1, but, please, notes I have done the listenning with the GRIMM CC1.
Now I must burn the K03XS.
The problem is that I have the two players ( K03X and K03XS) in the same time...So it's difficult for me to do compare them...
But it seem's that K03XS has more detailed, accuracy and warmer than the K03X.
I can say that K03X has more high treble and more bass, but the english is not my language...So it's difficult for me to describe what I heard...
 
I have listen the K03X in my home.
...But it seem's that K03XS has more detailed, accuracy and warmer than the K03X.

"Detail" and "accuracy" can go together. "Warmer" I would think not. Warmer tends to imply a coloration of the original sound, meaning you are adding something that is not originally there. Which is the opposite of accuracy.
 
Hello

Anyone tried to use his esoteric gear as a "digital transport with reclocking " ?
Basically using at the same time the usb input, the AES output and the clocking to an external clock .
I have a Mutec Mc3 and would like to "compare" with Esoteric in that particular usage ( given the much nicer build and power capacity should be at least as good...)
Obviously this won't be the main usage as I am also looking for a SACD/ CD player !

Thks
Alex

Sent from my SM-N9500 using Tapatalk
 
Hello

I use K03XS with Grimm CC1 : it is a clock and a very sexy clock because we can reclock the signal via AES.
I have connected a Mark Levinson N360S with the K03XS and the Grimm CC1.
The sound is another sound like that.
K03XS with Grimm CC1 is more lively than the ML 360S with Grimm CC1. With Grimm CC1 and ML 360S, the sound is smoother, but perhaps a little bit more fine...
That's what I think. It's only what I find with this combination.
Hope it's help you.

Envoyé de mon HTC 10 en utilisant Tapatalk
 
Hello

I use K03XS with Grimm CC1 : it is a clock and a very sexy clock because we can reclock the signal via AES.
I have connected a Mark Levinson N360S with the K03XS and the Grimm CC1.
The sound is another sound like that.
K03XS with Grimm CC1 is more lively than the ML 360S with Grimm CC1. With Grimm CC1 and ML 360S, the sound is smoother, but perhaps a little bit more fine...
That's what I think. It's only what I find with this combination.
Hope it's help you.

Envoyé de mon HTC 10 en utilisant Tapatalk
Thanks . didn't know about Grimm products but anyway have already my clocks.

Alex

Sent from my SM-N9500 using Tapatalk
 
I have listen the K03X in my home.
I have the Marantz SA7S1.
The K03X is above the SA7S1, but, please, notes I have done the listenning with the GRIMM CC1.
Now I must burn the K03XS.
The problem is that I have the two players ( K03X and K03XS) in the same time...So it's difficult for me to do compare them...
But it seem's that K03XS has more detailed, accuracy and warmer than the K03X.
I can say that K03X has more high treble and more bass, but the english is not my language...So it's difficult for me to describe what I heard...

hongkong, thank you for your comments. As a K-03X owner, I find these interesting, especially with the dearth of meaningful comments from other Xs model owners.
 
There is few comments because it's expensive and it's just to arrive on the market.

Envoyé de mon HTC 10 en utilisant Tapatalk
 
attachment.php
 

Attachments

I have test K-01Xs and K1 recently, K1 sounds better than K-01Xs, the difference can be observed very easy. I just wonder both CDP use same DAC clip and transport system, but why the sound has quite a big difference…
 
There are more factors that affect sound quality than just the DAC chip and transport mechanism. K1 has higher specification op-amps to start with.
 
Back
Top