Charleston Tragedy

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are fractured people all over world. In certain societies harmful individuals have a greater capacity to execute their psychotic tendencies because they have unfetered access to everyday resources that are a cultural way of life. While such conduct is unacceptable to the greater majority, such event frequencies are a tolerated casualty of that macro culture by virtue of fear and unwillingness for that society to change.
 
What so odd, is this punk had black friends. Also here is the reason he chose Charleston. he said "" “I chose Charleston because it is most historic city in my state, and at one time had the highest ratio of blacks to Whites in the country. We have no skinheads, no real KKK, no one doing anything but talking on the internet. Well someone has to have the bravery to take it to the real world, and I guess that has to be me.”


 
As long as their is easy access to guns, unfortunately it will continue to happen in the USA.

Australia had its own very bad tragedy in 1996 with 35 people killed. the govt acted very quickly with much harder gun controls. We have not really had these issues since.

Making supply much harder has to make a positive difference.
 
XV-1....Putting forward that suggestion is very offensive to a large percentage of Americans. People can be as sympathetic as they like but it will never happen as it is so deeply rooted into their culture. Firearm related crime and accident ratios in the USA is an accepted normality for the right to bare arms.

The monetary cost alone for such a constitutional change would be challenging as it may cause an economic collapse and a worldwide recession would ensue.
 
Banning guns won't do a thing...there are 100's of millions in the U.S. Laws never stopped a criminal from getting a gun. People who chose to do so have the right to own a gun for protection, hunting and recreational target shooting...responsible gun ownership is an American right.
 
Steve said:
XV-1....Putting forward that suggestion is very offensive to a large percentage of Americans. People can be as sympathetic as they like but it will never happen as it is so deeply rooted into their culture. Firearm related crime and accident ratios in the USA is an accepted normality for the right to bare arms.

The monetary cost alone for such a constitutional change would be challenging as it may cause an economic collapse and a worldwide recession would ensue.
Click to expand...

Steve

I think you may be doing Americans a disservice by lumping them all into the love guns brigade.

I guess the US president is not an American.;)

Anyway, cleary the way forward is to keep things the same :skeptical:


I will now sign off on the seemingly unimportant subject matter of tighter gun control.
 
rockitman said:
...there are 100's of millions in the U.S.
Click to expand...

I would agree that banning would not do a thing. Maybe category restrictions but also very politically and logistically challenging. I would think the numbers are much higher given population levels, collectibility, specialty and vintage.
 
I'm a huge gun rights advocate. I compete at times, pistol, 3-gun, long range rifle, shotgun, all of it. I build guns, and have taught myself a lot of gunsmithing skills. I reload ammo. I know all the gun laws that are on the books like the back of my hand, and I can recite gun crime statistics for hours.

All that, and I still am not going to make this thread political.
 
Vapor1 said:
I'm a huge gun rights advocate. I compete at times, pistol, 3-gun, long range rifle, shotgun, all of it. I build guns, and have taught myself a lot of gunsmithing skills. I reload ammo. I know all the gun laws that are on the books like the back of my hand, and I can recite gun crime statistics for hours.

All that, and I still am not going to make this thread political.
Click to expand...

tighter gun controls should not alter this right at all. You can do the same thing in Australia at registered gun clubs and on approved properties.
 
Charleston is about a young guy making a very bad move that in the long run will change nothing.

Gun control has been tried in Canada, gun registry was and is the biggest mess you ever saw.

The genie is out of the bottle no getting it back. Guns are out there anyone can get one in any country.

The only thing that has changed is families lost loved ones.
 
The real shame is that the family and friends had suspicions that the shooter was unstable. One of his friends even took his gun from him at one point, but then gave it back. Breakdown of the family and community is always a factor in tragedies like this. A strong support system is our first line of defense, that's always been the case through human history. I believe the dramatic increase in prescriptions of psychotropic drugs is directly related to this break down of the support system, and it's impossible to ignore the relationship because those drugs and violence.

This link has been getting a lot of circulation recently, but does illustrate that point whether you fully agree or not - Big list of drug-induced killers

Drugs aren't the problem, just like guns aren't the problem. Erosion of families, love, and support is the problem.
 
It not about the guns. Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols didn't use a gun to kill 168 people and injure over 600 others in the Oklahoma City bombing of the Federal building. Its about deranged/unstable individuals that feel they have a axe to grind against the government, someones way of life or someones pure hate for a race. We do have a problem with guns in this country and it's not that a gun was used in a crime but the weak justice system that allows gun crimes to be treated haphazardly in our courts.
 
it's about guns. x100

300 million guns in the country. any idiot/crazy/bad/angry/rabid person can get one any time they want if they are sufficiently motivated.....and nothing but changing that reality will change the inevitable continual carnage. and considering the agendas that currently exist it's only going to get worse.

using explosives instead of guns does not reduce the effect of millions and millions of guns embedded in the population and more embedded every day. protection for gun ownership is liberating and motivating for some and encouraging to their tendencies for mayhem. our forefathers did not write the 2nd amendment for the purpose it's now used for.

no doubt improved courts and police presence can make small dents in the problem but the scale of the 'bad people' + guns equation is too massive and the human psysche too unpredictable to put a band aid on it.

I don't expect anything to change in my lifetime.
 
Mike Lavigne said:
it's about guns. x100

300 million guns in the country. any idiot/crazy/bad/angry/rabid person can get one any time they want if they are sufficiently motivated.....and nothing but changing that reality will change the inevitable continual carnage. and considering the agendas that currently exist it's only going to get worse.

using explosives instead of guns does not reduce the effect of millions and millions of guns embedded in the population and more embedded every day. protection for gun ownership is liberating and motivating for some and encouraging to their tendencies for mayhem. our forefathers did not write the 2nd amendment for the purpose it's now used for.

no doubt improved courts and police presence can make small dents in the problem but the scale of the 'bad people' + guns equation is too massive and the human psysche too unpredictable to put a band aid on it.

I don't expect anything to change in my lifetime.
Click to expand...

Yep
 
Vapor1 said:
Drugs aren't the problem, just like guns aren't the problem. Erosion of families, love, and support is the problem.
Click to expand...

Well….. I sure wish that those coming from eroded families didn't have guns.
 
Yup, time to close it down. A sympathetic post about a tragic event has turned into a war.

Back to audio topics.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top