- Thread Author
- #1
Hi all, first time posting. I am finally in a place (life-wise and home-wise) to start putting together a home stereo system and am looking for some triple-checking of my math/specs to make sure what I'm doing will work.
The short version is that I heard a pair of ML electrostatic speakers about 10 years ago in a showroom and was floored by the imaging and clarity. Now that I'm ready to invest in a system, I've found a pair of used Theos speakers on Craigslist (original owner, had them for ~10 years, purchased from Stereo Exchange in NYC). I'm going to go listen to them this weekend, see if they match my memory. I am also buying a Sony STR-DA777ES receiver (circa 1999) from a friend. I won't be able to take the receiver to the speakers to test it all together before I buy, but the Sony *should* be beefy enough to power the ML's, I believe. The Sony puts out 120W at 8 ohms, 100W at 4 ohms. The ML spec is...
Seems like the Sony lands in the right range, right? There's no different between, say, a 100W tube monoblock and 100W solid-state from the Sony. 100W is 100W, right? (not talking quality, simply compatibility).
I read on the ML owners forum that it's important to pick an amp that can handle the fluctuations in impedance load, and that the sign of a good amp is a doubling of wattage at the lower impedance... which the Sony does NOT demonstrate. However, Google seems to suggests (below) that the massive power supply of the Sony and it's protect mode would protect it from blowing up if I play dynamic music too loudly...?
Any caveats/thoughts/suggestions are very welcome! Thanks in advance,
Alex
The short version is that I heard a pair of ML electrostatic speakers about 10 years ago in a showroom and was floored by the imaging and clarity. Now that I'm ready to invest in a system, I've found a pair of used Theos speakers on Craigslist (original owner, had them for ~10 years, purchased from Stereo Exchange in NYC). I'm going to go listen to them this weekend, see if they match my memory. I am also buying a Sony STR-DA777ES receiver (circa 1999) from a friend. I won't be able to take the receiver to the speakers to test it all together before I buy, but the Sony *should* be beefy enough to power the ML's, I believe. The Sony puts out 120W at 8 ohms, 100W at 4 ohms. The ML spec is...
| Recommended Amplifier Power | 20‒400 watts per channel |
| Impedance | 4 Ohms, 0.8 at 20kHz. Compatible with 4, 6, or 8 Ohm rated amplifiers. |
Seems like the Sony lands in the right range, right? There's no different between, say, a 100W tube monoblock and 100W solid-state from the Sony. 100W is 100W, right? (not talking quality, simply compatibility).
I read on the ML owners forum that it's important to pick an amp that can handle the fluctuations in impedance load, and that the sign of a good amp is a doubling of wattage at the lower impedance... which the Sony does NOT demonstrate. However, Google seems to suggests (below) that the massive power supply of the Sony and it's protect mode would protect it from blowing up if I play dynamic music too loudly...?
The "Audiophile Approach": Because the build quality is so substantial, many enthusiasts run complex or varying impedance speakers on the 8 Ω switch position anyway, provided the room is well-ventilated. Leaving it at 8Ω allows the amplifier to leverage its massive power reserves to drive impedance drops seamlessly. However, if you listen at high volumes for prolonged periods and the receiver triggers its PROTECT mode, you should back the switch down to the 4Ω position. [1, 2, 3]
Any caveats/thoughts/suggestions are very welcome! Thanks in advance,
Alex