Blind comparisons of speakers, amps, and DACs...

Status
Not open for further replies.
kzhtoo said:
How do you know the science as we know today is all there is about science and nothing more? How do you know a method to measure or a scientific understanding of what you term as “golden ears” hear won’t be developed in the future?

And I have yet to see any of you, if everything sounds the same, taking on $169.99 Best Buy cheap amp, $49.99 DAC and using all the free stock cables, while giving up all your gear currently in your system and still claim “I still enjoy my music”.
Click to expand...

Oh the bliss of being unaware (blind test ignorance)... Life can be so much simpler....



 
BlueFox said:
Personally, I have never blind tested anything. However, I have blindly bought all my gear and cables, and I love the resulting system. However, it did take a while to get to my current system since I kept upgrading everything until I got here. Now if Magico would introduce a S7 Mk II speaker I will be done for life.
Click to expand...

I have to say, this may actually be a rational approach to a hobby that can quickly become irrational if you give it even a tiny chance to pull you into the rabbit hole.

Buy the gear that appeals to you with speakers that fit your room and don't upset your ears and enjoy the results for what they are.

Upgrading endlessly to gain anything of significance, along an extreme slope of diminishing returns and then having to convince yourself you just spent tens of thousands of dollars so you better hear an improvement, well, most audiophiles are very familiar with that concept
 
BlueFox said:
Personally, I have never blind tested anything. However, I have blindly bought all my gear and cables, and I love the resulting system. However, it did take a while to get to my current system since I kept upgrading everything until I got here. Now if Magico would introduce a S7 Mk II speaker I will be done for life.
Click to expand...

If that happens you might feel the need to trade up to the Xs 150 (the S7 is efficient enough you probably wouldn't need the Xs 300); you know Mark will give you top dollar trade-in.
 
mep said:
My question was vey sincere and I think you answered it quite succulently when you said the answer is simple...to merely troll.
Click to expand...

And to continue to post "scientific" studies with no validity. What most people fail to realize is that if the study's methods aren't valid the results can't be valid except by coincidence, and removing the effects of (at a minimum) bias and fatigue is a monumental task, rarely if ever achieved.
 
Calling Ethan Winer...

This thread is missing its third stooge.
 
TheOctopus said:
Oh the bliss of being unaware (blind test ignorance)... Life can be so much simpler....



Click to expand...


The fundamental thing missing in the thread. The naysayers putting the money where the mouth is.

How about show us your $500 systems?

Let’s see the walk, we surely have heard quite a bit of talk.
 
This raises an interesting point. I can recall orchestral music pretty well in my mind, ie, "play back" a piece with some semblance of the sounds of different instruments. I am also pretty good with geometrical images, but can't conjure up colors at all.
I'm not claiming that my memory is good enough to compare one speaker to another, just that I can remember music pretty well. I agree with the TheOctopus, don't misunderstand my point. I am curious, though, about other peoples memory modes.
 
kzhtoo said:
The fundamental thing missing in the thread. The naysayers putting the money where the mouth is.

How about show us your $500 systems?

Let’s see the walk, we surely have heard quite a bit of talk.
Click to expand...

I've done many comparisons over the years comparing many of my own DACs/CDPs/Transports to cheaper mid fi. Last comparison was the Oppo 4K Bluray player UDP203 and then the audiophile version 205 that my friend purchased for himself. I would challenge anyone to do a blind comparison against their favorite DAC.... The OPPO more than stands on its own. Problem being when one is aware they are listening to OPPO, the mind starts to make excuses why it should NOT sound as good. Never fails. That's why the blind test are both good and bad for the hobby....
 
Did someone call for a third stooge? I had more faith in scientific method before HK started marketing Dr Toole's research to sell revel speakers, that and if the science is so 'right' why didn't their speakers scratch my itch? The open mockery of everything audiophile bleeding out of ASR doesn't help convince me either.
 
Capitol C said:
This raises an interesting point. I can recall orchestral music pretty well in my mind, ie, "play back" a piece with some semblance of the sounds of different instruments. I am also pretty good with geometrical images, but can't conjure up colors at all.
I'm not claiming that my memory is good enough to compare one speaker to another, just that I can remember music pretty well. I agree with the TheOctopus, don't misunderstand my point. I am curious, though, about other peoples memory modes.
Click to expand...

Are you musically trained? I cannot recall anything of any song. I instantly recognize the song, I can evaluate all the audiophile parameters and qualities of any HiFi sound. I am good at that over 30 years but how can I be sure it is any different or better/worse than what I heard a few minutes before when science tells me I cannot? I already posted a video that asks to identify a tone after only a few seconds and I cannot be 100% sure if it is same or different, which is the whole point of it? If you have to guess, then it is NOT a good memory.

There is no WAY I can remember any piece of music note for note, pitch, timbre and other parameters. Only a captured file can be compared on a computer that way. Audiophiles of course ARE computers in their own mind LOL
 
I took lessons, including theory, for about 10 years, playing classical guitar, but stopped playing a long time ago, but the musical memory came first. I can remember a lot of the (popular) songs from the 60s, that is, I can sing the lyrics (with a not so good singing voice, sadly) and add a poor imitation of the instrumentals, but the original memory is pretty clear in my mind when I (mentally) play it back. (I mostly listen to classical music now.) However, and more to the point of your interesting thread, my memory is NOT good enough for me to listen to my restored AR-3a speakers and then say "Ah-ha! The GoldenEar Triton 2+ speakers downstairs did a better job on the bass, while the midranges are similar." By the way, both systems are driven by midfi electronics, a Carver HR 722 for the vintage speakers, and a Yamaha RS 700 downstairs. (I'll eventually get my AR-AU amp off my workbench to drive the AR speakers.) So I put my audio money where my beliefs are--decent electronics with enough power coupled to high-quality speakers. And the speaker wires are zip cord.
 
mep said:
I believe it does. It was destined to be a clown show from the OP and it didn’t disappoint.
Click to expand...

I am not the OP but I would be offended. You are one rude individual with zero to offer in terms of an intelligent conversation.

As far as CLOWNS, let's not go there... Don't do any blind tests OK?
 
TheOctopus said:
I am not the OP but I would be offended. You are one rude individual with zero to offer in terms of an intelligent conversation.

As far as CLOWNS, let's not go there... Don't do any blind tests OK?
Click to expand...

The OP isn’t to blame because he hasn’t been around audio forums that long to know what he thought was an innocent thread would devolve into what it was destined to be. NOBODY puts together a system based on DBT.
 
mep said:
The OP isn’t to blame because he hasn’t been around audio forums that long to know what he thought was an innocent thread would devolve into what it was destined to be. NOBODY puts together a system based on DBT.
Click to expand...

That's exactly what I and half a dozen of my audiophile buddies did over at least a decade back in the 90's. We would evaluate different components and cables in the various systems that we owned. Blind testing was easy with each other's help and in various systems. The hard part was giving up on illusions but that is exactly why NOT ONE of my friends have made changes to their system in over a decade except me. I know all about the "Silence of Cables" OK? The Cable Company and Soundex, one being a cable lending library and the other a Mecca for all the top new and preowned gear in/around Philadelphia and surround areas, were our playground and play we did all through the 90s and early 2000s
 
By the way, I am thoroughly convinced that the nature of all of this is such that we will hear what we want to hear but only if we get to SEE it as well.

So it may very well be pointless to keep denying that expensive and pretty gear appears to sound better, even if a blind test will reveals a NO better than 50/50 or random guess of a difference between their actual performance.

If it is difficult or impossible to retain a good memory of a sound for more than a brief moment or recreate a song in your memory for an accurate comparison, then certainly looking at what it is you are listening to, will alter your perceived reality as memory is a MALEABLE construct.

It was so with the Violin experiment and it was so even with the Wine Expert experiment... So why would it be different for us audiophiles?

It needs to appeal to the eyes and it will appeal to the ears so long as the quality is such that there are no gross abnormalities with the response from speakers!

Enjoy with all your senses but don't forget to wipe the fingerprints off the shiny boxes or they may start to sound worse :lol:
 
I have done many blind tests. Once I was familiar with the sound characteristics of a component or cable or vibration device I would do blind tests with the same equipment. My blind tests nearly matched my sighted tests. It was not hard to hear differences in blind test for cables, especially digital cables once I was familiar with their sound characteristics. That is my science.

There is a reason you can no longer buy snake oil, it never worked. Cables still sell because they matter.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
 
TheGemState said:
I have done many blind tests. Once I was familiar with the sound characteristics of a component or cable or vibration device I would do blind tests with the same equipment. My blind tests nearly matched my sighted tests. It was not hard to hear differences in blind test for cables, especially digital cables once I was familiar with their sound characteristics. That is my science.

There is a reason you can no longer buy snake oil, it never worked. Cables still sell because they matter.

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

Cables still sell because of forums. I would love to see your skills put to the test and I say that without trying to offend anyone. The very notion that there is a change will make our minds want to hear a change. Sure, we can all hear a difference when presented with a change... at least that's what our minds expect. Try to pick a cable out of a few others consistently. That's what I and my friends have attempted over decades. Wasn't happening. Alas, picking out the right cable, file resolution, violin... remains an elusive task at best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top