Benchmark AHB2

Are you just looking for a pre or pre with a dac option? The SST would be the obvious choice, testing one in two days time. Alternatively with a Lumin player you go straight to the amp and use the iPad as controller. Another option is the new dac from W4S with volume controlled from an iPad. Mola Mola is supposed to be really good as well but is about £7,000. Extra for the dac card.
 
.....continued

ABH2 vs Gato NAP250S

Ok this is a bit unfair. The Gato is an integrated with built in dac and blue tooth. It uses the Pascal class D module like JR use(but maybe not exactly the same module series?). Very well made and finished chassis from stainless steel. Lovely feel to the volume control and switches. Made in Denmark. This retails for £3,600. Price/performance ratio is excellent.

For the test I configured the Gato as a power amp only running RCA's from the Lumin S1 analog outputs and using the iPad app to control volume. The usual range of music was used. As you would expect the stand alone AHB2 power amp (£3,300) was better overall but the Gato was pretty good. If anybody is looking for a compact, well made integrated at this price point I think the Gato would be difficult to better. It does not quite have the depth or space around instruments as the ABH2 but is very musically engaging with good controlled bass (much improved after 150 hours burn in) and rhythm / pace. Gato make a better integrated using MOSfets at around £5,500 which might be another story. They also do a very nice preamp for around £5000.


to be continued.....Hypex NC500 Class D vs ABH2 vs Gato
 
Just a plan pre-amplifier probably. I will be continuing with the Benchmark as my DAC and headphone amplifier. Also a very nice backup pre-amplifier!

The W4S won't work because I require at least 2 analog inputs (for SACD spinner and Tuner :) )....

The SST would be a nice match to the SST amplifier but with the DAC option and remote it is a bit pricey for now. I also think that EJ's absolutely best pre-amplifier is the Wyred 4 Sound STP-SE. It is approaching legendary status :D... ok, my opinion but many people agree :)...
 
Hmmmm... probably should give it a good 200 hours.... EJ has actually told me he recommends 500 hours on an amplifier :)....
 
I have the Gato 250 integrated, and unless something has changed with the "S" model, I don't think you can really use it as just a power amp. From the 6 Moons review of the 400 model (which works the same as the 250):

I subsequently learnt that "the HT function on the DIA400 does not allow you direct access to the output stage. It simply sets a fixed volume at 0dB. It's still an active input." That explained it. Putting two preamp stages in series is rarely a good idea for ultimate sonics after all.

So the comparison with the Benchmark may not be apples to apples.

I have tried using the Gato just as a preamp and it was quite good, but I think the stand alone ones (Classé & Ayre) bettered it in my system.
 
Mrppv said:
I have the Gato 250 integrated, and unless something has changed with the "S" model, I don't think you can really use it as just a power amp. From the 6 Moons review of the 400 model (which works the same as the 250):

I subsequently learnt that "the HT function on the DIA400 does not allow you direct access to the output stage. It simply sets a fixed volume at 0dB. It's still an active input." That explained it. Putting two preamp stages in series is rarely a good idea for ultimate sonics after all.

So the comparison with the Benchmark may not be apples to apples.

I have tried using the Gato just as a preamp and it was quite good, but I think the stand alone ones (Classé & Ayre) bettered it in my system.
Click to expand...


You might be correct? The manual is a bit misleading in that case.

Gato as a integrated vs Gato as pre to ABH2, produced a more open smoother sound with the ABH2 in place. Like I said the Gato is a very nice integrated for the price and their more expensive model I understand is outstanding.
 
Yes, using Gato as pre, feeding the ABH2, was also better for me, compared to Gato integrated. I noticed more resolution with the ABH2.
 
I popped by to see Alto again today and had the chance to hear the SST in the same system that I'd heard the Hypex NC500 in before. I did not hear the swap but I was very impressed with the SST in comparison. In that system the SST improved the exact elements I might have criticised that system with before. So, it was smoother, but with no lack of detail at all, in fact probably the opposite, easier to pick out the qualities of each instrument in the soundstage. I'd also say there was an edge to the system at volume in some tracks with the Hypex, this edge was not there now, so no reaching for the volume control to knock it down a bit.

The SST was impressive indeed, not that the Hypex wasn't at all impressive (and is probably half the price remember), but purely on the basis of auditioning of the two, the SST clearly wins on many levels, it's just had that 'goldilocks' thing where it was very musically involving too and I was enjoying it from the word go.

I didn't hear the ABH2. Anyway, thought I'd chime in, as more opinions to read are always good.
 
Nice.... you are hearing pretty much what I am with the SST... I love having an old ARC for tube listening and my Ampzilla for SS duties... Waiting for my STP-SE to arrive back and I should be golden for now!
 
I prefer to keep these comparisons in this thread, so I am going to copy them over here and ask that the other one be deleted...


Alto:
"....continued

ABH2 vs Gato NAP250S

Ok this is a bit unfair. The Gato is an integrated with built in dac and blue tooth. It uses the Pascal class D module like JR use(but maybe not exactly the same module series?). Very well made and finished chassis from stainless steel. Lovely feel to the volume control and switches. Made in Denmark. This retails for £3,600. Price/performance ratio is excellent.

For the test I configured the Gato as a power amp only running RCA's from the Lumin S1 analog outputs and using the iPad app to control volume. The usual range of music was used. As you would expect the stand alone AHB2 power amp (£3,300) was better overall but the Gato was pretty good. If anybody is looking for a compact, well made integrated at this price point I think the Gato would be difficult to better. It does not quite have the depth or space around instruments as the ABH2 but is very musically engaging with good controlled bass (much improved after 150 hours burn in) and rhythm / pace. Gato make a better integrated using MOSfets at around £5,500 which might be another story. They also do a very nice preamp for around £5000.


to be continued.....Hypex NC500 Class D vs ABH2 vs Gato"

Alto:
"My new SST amp is even better than the demo model I had before. Even more open, notes extended, human voice even more palpable, bass tighter and generally more detail. This was quite a surprise since it is not even run in yet. So I think the demo unit is a very early model and production models are now even better. This amp is in a different league compared to the others tested. I got the price wrong in the post above it is in fact £4,200 not £4,500 as stated.

Any body interested in a demo drop me a pm. I'm in the UK."

Alto:
"Just to conclude the test.....Hypex NC500 Class D vs Gato.

The Gato needs at least 200 hours burn in before it sounds good. The Pascal class D Gato sounded smoother with tighter bass and more depth once it was run-in. The fit and finish is superb. If you are wanting an all in one then this amps deserves your attention. 250 watts, built in dac and blue tooth all for £3600 represents very good value . The Hypex in comparison was very dynamic but more forward in it's presentation. It is a power amp only and at around £2000 for the pair I believe is hard to beat at this price point. Both are good amps for the money, just depends what SQ you like.

The ABH2 was preferred to both of these class D amps, being more open, better sound stage, effortless and less grain to the treble. It is the more expensive option, costing £1,300 more than the Hypex mono's.

The SST is over twice the price of the Hypex monos and £900 more than the ABH2. But in my opinion it is worth the extra. This amp is in a different league and would compare sonically with amps costing more than double the price.

So there you have it: all the amps are good in there own way but if your budget allows the SST is a stand out amplifier in my opinion and worth paying the extra if the rest of your system justifies it."

Randy Myers:
"Excellent write up and comparisons! Thank you for the effort. I agree with you on the quality of the Ampzilla, great amp and worth every penny."

Alto:
"Thanks.

Next amp on test probably Mola Mola NC 1200 based amps? More than twice the price of the SST, so should be better. But?

Currently evaluating the SST pre/dac. Hopefully the USB input works with the soon to arrive
fidata network audio server. The fidata will be subject to a separate review in a new thread. Watch this space it is supposed to be world class."


Sorry to put all these post into this one. I just thought if some one was following this thread it would be easier to read them all here because they might not be aware of the other thread.... thanks and sorry :D...
 
I love the comparisons you are doing, and thank you! I just got confused on which thread to go to to continue the comparisons :)....
 
Can you change the title of this thread so it contains all the amps being compared?
 
If anyone is considering this amp, I just took advantage of a RMAF show special. 10%discount until Wednesday using code BENCHRMAF2017 at checkout. Mine will be here this week. Eager to compare to my First Watt F6.
 
Denver said:
If anyone is considering this amp, I just took advantage of a RMAF show special. 10%discount until Wednesday using code BENCHRMAF2017 at checkout. Mine will be here this week. Eager to compare to my First Watt F6.
Click to expand...

The amp arrived today! After only two albums, this amp is probably a keeper. More to come later.
 
Nice, congratulations on your new amplifier. I have a ton of respect for Benchmark. At one time I was considering getting one of these amps. That was when I was using the Benchmark DAC-3 HGC. I thought it was a very good DAC. However I have moved on to a new DAC, etc., etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top