Bones13
Active member
Server Unit - needs sufficient storage for your files, sufficient power for your OS and any file manipulation during playback. Most will connect to the internet and the Player unit via Ethernet, some espouse WiFi for one, or both. The quality of the user interface, and file manipulation, are the main determining factors, IMO.
Player unit ultimately depends on its connection to the DAC. USB, one of the various SPDIF connections, or I2S (not fully standardized, although HDMI is seen a lot).
Fanless, silent, server unit options are prominent. If you place the server unit outside the listening area, a fan cooled PC can provide all the power needed for a decent price. Memory and storage are not overly expensive.
Fanless player units tend to be the norm. This is because much lower power processing/memory/storage is required at this point.
All sorts of tweaks, at every point in the system, being sold to improve SQ in some way. Typically the signal Ethernet, or output to DAC, is isolated, reclocked, or whatever.
I’ve been a Roon lifer since Chris showed it on Computer Audiophile, years back.
I’ve tried all sorts of server units, some with Windows (+/-) software alteration, and Roon ROCK. I’ve used a NAS, a fanless NUC6, and a couple of flaky DIY fanless PC builds. Seems like I keep ending up with the NUC/ROCK unit. The NAS is a bit sluggish with my library.
I had an early microRendu with various PSU options, and USB cables. Really improved over a rather standard server PC to DAC via USB. You can tweak to obsession level.
I had a good year a while back and upgraded to the Bricasti M12. The player PC is a small Linux unit with direct connection to the DAC boards inside the box (I2S I assume). 3 linear PSUs inside the box. My only knock for it is that won’t do the endpoint HQPlayer thing. But then, I don’t spend time doodling with all those settings. I do use Roon the resample all music to DSD128 going to the Bricasti, as there is a separate DSD board, that sounds best to me.
Only other tweak I use is optical Ethernet to an etherRegen switch. The optimized ethernet side goes to the Bricasti.
Player unit ultimately depends on its connection to the DAC. USB, one of the various SPDIF connections, or I2S (not fully standardized, although HDMI is seen a lot).
Fanless, silent, server unit options are prominent. If you place the server unit outside the listening area, a fan cooled PC can provide all the power needed for a decent price. Memory and storage are not overly expensive.
Fanless player units tend to be the norm. This is because much lower power processing/memory/storage is required at this point.
All sorts of tweaks, at every point in the system, being sold to improve SQ in some way. Typically the signal Ethernet, or output to DAC, is isolated, reclocked, or whatever.
I’ve been a Roon lifer since Chris showed it on Computer Audiophile, years back.
I’ve tried all sorts of server units, some with Windows (+/-) software alteration, and Roon ROCK. I’ve used a NAS, a fanless NUC6, and a couple of flaky DIY fanless PC builds. Seems like I keep ending up with the NUC/ROCK unit. The NAS is a bit sluggish with my library.
I had an early microRendu with various PSU options, and USB cables. Really improved over a rather standard server PC to DAC via USB. You can tweak to obsession level.
I had a good year a while back and upgraded to the Bricasti M12. The player PC is a small Linux unit with direct connection to the DAC boards inside the box (I2S I assume). 3 linear PSUs inside the box. My only knock for it is that won’t do the endpoint HQPlayer thing. But then, I don’t spend time doodling with all those settings. I do use Roon the resample all music to DSD128 going to the Bricasti, as there is a separate DSD board, that sounds best to me.
Only other tweak I use is optical Ethernet to an etherRegen switch. The optimized ethernet side goes to the Bricasti.