Shunyata Typhon T2

Just to clarify: The TYPHON T2 was created specifically to be a mate to the Denali 6000/2 v2. When combined with the Denali it is an 8 outlet distributor, with two high current outlets dedicated to amplifiers. The Denali, T2 stack is the answer for people that have asked for a "shelf mount" version of the Everest. (Although it was created with the Denali in mind, it is also compatible with any of our other power conditioners including older models like the Hydra Model-8, VRay or Tritons.). The one exception to this is the Everest. Pairing the Everest with the T2 is not a good match. Too much of a good thing is too much.

The TYPHON T2 has the same QR/BB engine as that in the Everest.
Therefore, in some systems, the Denali 6000/S v2 and TT2 stack may perform slightly better than an Everest. But all that is highly dependent upon each individual system.

Both the Everest and the Denali/T2 stack are world-class in performance and they are extremely close in overall performance. The deciding factor on which to choose would probably be form factor. Do you prefer a vertical stand-alone power distributor or a more conventional shelf mount unit. In our reference system, we use the Everest to power the Constellation preamp, amplifiers and active crossover. We use a Denali 6000/S v2 and TT2 stack to power the Aurender and dCS digital stack.

The other major application for the T2 is as a stand-alone power distributor for high power amplifiers. A typcial application would be to use an Everest for the front-end equipment and the Typhon T2 to power the amplifier(s) off a separate dedicated line. There is a 30A Typhon option that will be available in January.

Hi Caelin,

Thanks for your thorough response and the clarification.

Best,
Ken
 
My current set up is D2000T for my monoblock amps and Denali V1 for the rest.
Will it be beneficial to connect the T2 outlet (not the umbilical one) to D2000 for the amps?
If not, any suggestion to keep D2000T in my current set up? Thanks
 
@CGabriel - running a simple setup with a Boulder stereo amp and Lumin X1 DAC/streamer. Is there any potential downside to running those two items off a single Typhon T2, or would I be better off separating the source and amp on two separate units?
 
@CGabriel - running a simple setup with a Boulder stereo amp and Lumin X1 DAC/streamer. Is there any potential downside to running those two items off a single Typhon T2, or would I be better off separating the source and amp on two separate units?

There is no downside to connecting both components to a single TT2. If however, you are using two separate dedicated AC lines for each component, then I would recommend two TT2s. But I think you will be more than happy with a single TT2.

(and JFYI, the @CGabriel does nothing to notify me. I just happened to see your post)
 
So... what improvement could I expect if I put a TYPHON T2 in front of each of my amplifiers, which are presently plugged straight into the wall?
 
I think it might be similar to the effects of an Everest but with a bit higher DTCD(?). If I understand the purpose of Typhon T2 correctly. There should be no other more desirable unit for an amp or amps.

I have therefore decided to put the duties of 3 large Meridian active speakers on the T2. They were driven by the Triton V3 previously. Umbilical goes to active center speaker. I know there is no filtering in that cord but that is fine for this purpose.
 
Right now my PassLabs XS300 amps are on Shunyata Sigma HC power cords plugged directly into the wall... each on its own dedicated circuit.

What would have the most positive impact on my system...

Adding a TT2 for each amplifier?
Or upgrading the power cords (which are 2 or 3 generations behind the current ones) to the latest Omega power cords and going directly to the wall?

Or should I hold off on either for now and instead look at getting properly grounded with the Altaira?
 
So... what improvement could I expect if I put a TYPHON T2 in front of each of my amplifiers, which are presently plugged straight into the wall?

Given that Typhon T2 has a QR/BB device in it, my thought is you'd experience improved immediacy, greater dynamic slam, and improved bass power and extension.
 
Right now my PassLabs XS300 amps are on Shunyata Sigma HC power cords plugged directly into the wall... each on its own dedicated circuit.

What would have the most positive impact on my system...

Adding a TT2 for each amplifier?
Or upgrading the power cords (which are 2 or 3 generations behind the current ones) to the latest Omega power cords and going directly to the wall?

Or should I hold off on either for now and instead look at getting properly grounded with the Altaira?
I would suggest upgrading the power cords first to Omega level versus the 2 generation back Sigma HC as the biggest opportunity for improvement of all those great options given where you are today.


Sent from my SM-G998U using Tapatalk
 
Before the Typhon T2 the options were Omega QR and keep the layout. Or go Typhon QR for each amp.

But yes, upgrade to XC. Sigma HC is a bit blurry in comparison.
 
As a follow up to my earlier question regarding Denali 6000T v2 + Typhon T2 combination vs. Everest...

If someone has more than one 20A line to use, as I do, would it be better to have the Denali on one line for all but the amp(s) and the Typhon T2 on the other line for just the amp(s), as opposed to using an Everest for everything on just one line? It seems like that would be the case.

Also, looking down the road to using the Altair grounding system, is there a difference in the GCS performance between T2 and Everest?
 
As a follow up to my earlier question regarding Denali 6000T v2 + Typhon T2 combination vs. Everest...

If someone has more than one 20A line to use, as I do, would it be better to have the Denali on one line for all but the amp(s) and the Typhon T2 on the other line for just the amp(s), as opposed to using an Everest for everything on just one line? It seems like that would be the case.

Given that Shunyata has stated that a combo of Denali 6000 v2 and Typhon provides a bit more absolute performance than Everest alone, that seems like a reasonable hypothesis. But, I've gotten to the point where I view things in terms of what I refer to as "practically significant". That is, what matters in the real world. So, with respect to Denali v2/Typhon T2 > Everest? My understanding is, at least from a "statisically significant" difference, Yes. But, would it be practically significant enough for me to sell my Everest and get a Denali v2 and Typhon T2 just to have that little bit more performance? No.

Also, looking down the road to using the Altair grounding system, is there a difference in the GCS performance between T2 and Everest?

Again, I don't think there would be, from any practically significant perspective, but I don't think any of us would be able to say definitively at this point, simply because Typhon T2 has just come on the market.
 
Thanks Stephen. I understand there's really not any real world experience with the Typhon T2 but was really just asking from the standpoint of the tech/components involved for those who know and understand it.

I ask all of this as one who found the jump from Denali 6000T v1 to v2 a game (and system) changer in terms of performance. Particularly for amps, which definitely benefit from it unlike any other of many power conditioning type products I've ever tried from Shunyata and various others. I'm sure it's even more pronounced with Everest and Typhon T2. So the new generation Shunyata power distributors seem to be on an eintirely different level than their past products.
 
Thanks Stephen. I understand there's really not any real world experience with the Typhon T2 but was really just asking from the standpoint of the tech/components involved for those who know and understand it.

I ask all of this as one who found the jump from Denali 6000T v1 to v2 a game (and system) changer in terms of performance. Particularly for amps, which definitely benefit from it unlike any other of many power conditioning type products I've ever tried from Shunyata and various others. I'm sure it's even more pronounced with Everest and Typhon T2. So the new generation Shunyata power distributors seem to be on an eintirely different level than their past products.

Hi Rance,
That's great news and info with your experiences with the Denali V2; it was the same for me when I went from the original Triton v1 to Denali V2, and especially so upgraded from a Delta PC to a Sigma XC power cable. That was a big improvement.

But...adding Everest, I gotta say, was just an amazing improvement. I clearly remember that after the evening I added it into the system, I went to bed shaking my head in disbelief. Whoa! :exciting:

I'm sure that adding a Typhon T2 in conjunction with a Denali v2 would be pretty dang amazing if it even slightly out-performed Everest alone.

And yes, the new generation Shunyata power distributors are definitely on another level altogether from the previous gen ones, at least in my experience of owning three previous generation models (or four, if you count my Denali v2). In particular, the bigger and improved QR/BB devices REALLY brings a lot to the party. Again, Everest just frickin' blew my mind when I added to my system.

Cheers, buddy!
 
...Particularly for amps, which definitely benefit from it unlike any other of many power conditioning type products I've ever tried from Shunyata and various others. I'm sure it's even more pronounced with Everest and Typhon T2..

System dependent. Everest didn't bring much to the party for me. Shunyata was generous enough to offer a return for full refund.
 
System dependent. Everest didn't bring much to the party for me. Shunyata was generous enough to offer a return for full refund.

I have to say, I love my AudioQuest Niagara 5000. It provides excellent linear noise reduction and I cannot perceive any current limitation. I have both of my Vandersteen M7-HPA Monoblocks and Model 7 Mk2 Speaker Subwoofer Monoblocks plugged into the high current outlets and my MSB Select II DAC, UMT V Signature Transport and Roon Nucleus Plus plugged into the low current outlets and it sounds phenomenal. Have never looked back since purchasing it. Totally satisfied.

Ken
 
I'll let you know how the Denali v2 scales with the T2. I have one incoming and I'm currently using a Typhon QR with the Denali. The Denali/TQR combo is for my amps/subs and I'm using an Everest for the front end. (looks like I need to update my sig!)
 
Any user experience to report yet?

A friend of mine told me just today he's using a pair of Typhon T2 with his Nagra HD monoblocks. Here's what he said about using Typhon T2 with his amps:

"My sound is better than I thought possible. The Typhon’s are amazing how they tighten up the low end and assist with dynamic passages"
 
Back
Top