Shunyata Typhon T2
- Thread starter Mike
- Start date
Well, he have asked about connecting a Denali ... I'm asking about connecting a small system consisting of just 3 components.
Denali has it's own set of filters. I would like to know, if the Typhoon T2 has three independent sets of filters, or maybe the umbilical out is tied to one of the the regular outlets.
Denali has it's own set of filters. I would like to know, if the Typhoon T2 has three independent sets of filters, or maybe the umbilical out is tied to one of the the regular outlets.
Crumhorn
New member
- Joined
- Oct 21, 2017
- Messages
- 69
Ahh... Sorry! As far as I can tell, there are no CCI filters on the T2, meaning that if different type of components (ie analog & digital) are plugged in to the 2 outlets they would not be filtered from each other, which is not ideal. I doubt, but have no clue, whether the umbilical connection could be used for a 3rd component...
Just to clarify, in a segmented system, one connects each Altaira to the T2’s ground terminals. Then another ground cable from the T2 to the V2?
What’s the reason for connecting the ground terminals between the T2 and V2?
Puma Cat
Well-known member
When a T2 is used in conjunction with Denali, the two function as a single, two-chassis power distributor. You need to connect the two chassis together electrically, which is the function of the jumper. The reason you connect the CGC from Altaira to the T2 is because it is T2 that is connected to the incoming power cord. This creates the shortest distance between the earth ground in the power cord and the chassis ground of the dual-chassis power distributor.
So, my thought is, if you've got two Altairas in a segmented system you want to use in conjunction with a Denali V2/Typhon T2, I'd suggest connecting one Altaira's 7th terminal to the other Altaira's 7 terminal, and then connect a CGC from this 2nd Altaira to one of T2's ground terminals. You'd then use the 2nd GP-NR terminal of T2 to connect to the GP-NR terminal of Denali.
The video makes it clear you can use the dedicated umbilical connection for another component, if you order an umbilical with a C15 or C19 connector. But if one is going to order just a T2 (that has no CCI filters) to use up to three components, the question is, for the asking price, would it be best to just get a Denali v2 for an extra $500 - in other words, which one would sound best for up to 3 components. The 3-component scenario also raises the issue of that 30A umbilical connector, in the sense that if it were a typical outlet, one could use any cord - like the Alpha, Sigma or Omega - not just that umbilical cord they now sell. I like the 30A connector, but it doesn't feel like a good overall decision to me...
I think T2 is primarily pitched at existing Denali owners who want Everest performance without having to sell their Denali and buy a new Everest. It seems T2 is universal voltage, same as Typhon was. T2 should have the cable cradle.
Dizzie
Active member
So far no comments on performance and that is what I am interested in. My dilemma is that I have two systems so funds get divided. My Denali v2 is on a split-wall system so only front-end components are connected to it. Amplification is on a different power conditioner so benefits of a Typhon are diminished.
Amazing that a Denali can now be expanded by an additional 3 boxes (2 box Altaira and a Typhon). That total is more boxes than I have to connect (source, DAC, preamplifier).:bonkers:
Amazing that a Denali can now be expanded by an additional 3 boxes (2 box Altaira and a Typhon). That total is more boxes than I have to connect (source, DAC, preamplifier).:bonkers:
I would keep your present layout. Keep the Denali on one wall for the source components and put the Typhon T2 on the amplifiers. You didn't say which power conditioner was powering the amps? Unless it is an Everest, it doesn't really matter which conditioner it is, including one of ours. The effects of a Typhon T2 on amplifiers cannot be overstated.
Dizzie
Active member
Caelin,
Thank you for the suggestion. If only it was that easy. The amplifiers (1 stereo or 2 monos seasonally) are on platforms between Sound Lab speakers. I need 4 outlets. Roger West swears power cords, etc. do not affect the Sound Labs because of the massive transformer and the resulting low voltage to the panels. Still, I can't bring myself to plug them into the wall or use factory power cords.
Currently the Sound Labs share an Audience AR6-TSSOX with the amplifiers. I have Delta v2 NRs on the Sound Labs. I felt they were a good cost compromise considering they were "allegedly" not going to be an improvement. They are an aesthetic improvement and flexible enough to assume the downward-facing-dog position required to insert into the top of the Sound Lab transformer box.
Puma Cat
Well-known member
I don't think anyone has received one yet as it was just announced in Mike's post about two weeks ago.
Dizzie
Active member
Why? :doubtful: The Everest already contains the technology incorporated in the Typhon T2. And, if I am not mistaken, in the Everest the components are bigger and badder.
I already asked Shunyata that question. T2 is intended for power conditioners below Everest.
For an additional level of noise reduction in high EMI environments.
From the Shunyata website:
The Typhon T2 also comes equipped to receive an optional Performance or Reference level umbilical, allowing it to be connected in-line to any Shunyata power-distributor as a performance force-multiplier of the first order.
Ken
Just to clarify: The TYPHON T2 was created specifically to be a mate to the Denali 6000/2 v2. When combined with the Denali it is an 8 outlet distributor, with two high current outlets dedicated to amplifiers. The Denali, T2 stack is the answer for people that have asked for a "shelf mount" version of the Everest. (Although it was created with the Denali in mind, it is also compatible with any of our other power conditioners including older models like the Hydra Model-8, VRay or Tritons.). The one exception to this is the Everest. Pairing the Everest with the T2 is not a good match. Too much of a good thing is too much.
The TYPHON T2 has the same QR/BB engine as that in the Everest.
Therefore, in some systems, the Denali 6000/S v2 and TT2 stack may perform slightly better than an Everest. But all that is highly dependent upon each individual system.
Both the Everest and the Denali/T2 stack are world-class in performance and they are extremely close in overall performance. The deciding factor on which to choose would probably be form factor. Do you prefer a vertical stand-alone power distributor or a more conventional shelf mount unit. In our reference system, we use the Everest to power the Constellation preamp, amplifiers and active crossover. We use a Denali 6000/S v2 and TT2 stack to power the Aurender and dCS digital stack.
The other major application for the T2 is as a stand-alone power distributor for high power amplifiers. A typcial application would be to use an Everest for the front-end equipment and the Typhon T2 to power the amplifier(s) off a separate dedicated line. There is a 30A Typhon option that will be available in January.