Stereophile Recommended Components: 2019 Edition

Yes, I use it more as a list of avoidance. For the most part if it is on this list, avoid it. This has worked well for me for years. I have found that what does not make it on this list is better than what does. That's just my milage, everyone's will vary.
 
Always fun to look at it. So much gear that is missing. And, also, gear that's included that is no longer made.
 
Audiophobiac said:
Yes, I use it more as a list of avoidance. For the most part if it is on this list, avoid it. This has worked well for me for years. I have found that what does not make it on this list is better than what does. That's just my milage, everyone's will vary.
Click to expand...

Agree. From my perch, this is just an absurd outdated list, that appears to be used by Stereophile as a "filler". In my younger days I may have referred to it but now it is a nuisance I avoid. Same goes with all these "Golden Ears" etc awards.
 
at least the Stereophile list is not related to their list of current advertisers, like another publication. I'd rather something be somewhat irrelevant than manipulative.
 
Audiophobiac said:
Yes, I use it more as a list of avoidance. For the most part if it is on this list, avoid it. This has worked well for me for years. I have found that what does not make it on this list is better than what does. That's just my milage, everyone's will vary.
Click to expand...

This only reflects what they have reviewed. They can only review so much each month, so a lot of gear will be over looked. I guess that is a boo-hoo moment, but that’s life. However, they should change the list name to ‘Gear Reviewed’.
 
I think real owners on forums are quickly surpassing magazines as the source for new buyers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
kiwi_1282001 said:
The recommended components list has its limitations.


First, the component must generally be reviewed by Stereophile and it’s obviously not possible to review everything.


Second, the component must be currently available in the US and furthermore generally be available at five or more hi-fi retail outlets. This ruling tends to preclude or at least disfavour manufacturers that sell direct to end users and also product which is either new to the US market or hasn’t yet built out the requisite dealer network.


Third, Stereophile reviewers and editors generally pick and choose what products to review based on their own interest and what they felt appropriate for their readers to know about. If reviewers are not current or have little interest in state of the art digital products / DAC's etc, or don't wish to risk their reputation on products which might be considered 'esoteric' or pseudoscience in nature - then these products will be absent.


Fourth, product not represented in the US is absent from the list. There are of course some outstanding audio manufacturers which do not target, have a strong interest in, or lack the resources to engage the US market.




I am not criticising the above limitations as they are defensible or at least understandable. For example, it is perfectly reasonable for Stereophile to consider it wasteful to publish reports on products that the magazine's U.S. readers could not locally audition for themselves at specialty retailers.


However, the limitations IMHO do tend to lead to lists which look dated and devoid of many new and outstanding audio products.
Click to expand...


JA Review Policy

[h=2]The Law and the Prophets: Stereophile's Review Policies[/h]
John Atkinson | Mar 9, 2007

https://www.stereophile.com/asweseeit/307awsi/index.html
 
Here's the good news: No one is required to read any list of recommended components, but you are free to read them and bitch about them on forums.
 
BlueFox said:
This only reflects what they have reviewed. They can only review so much each month, so a lot of gear will be over looked. I guess that is a boo-hoo moment, but that’s life. However, they should change the list name to ‘Gear Reviewed’.
Click to expand...

Long understood. I don't begrudge certain gear being left off or included or whatever. We all have our favorites, so what?
 
Mike said:
I think real owners on forums are quickly surpassing magazines as the source for new buyers.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Click to expand...

I don't know about that, but I will add that I just think Stereophoole (as I call it) and most other publications are irrelevant on the whole in my opinion. I trust their reviews as far as I can throw the building they are written in.
In my opinion, self-education and research should be the majority source. Good to ask questions of owners indeed, but keep in mind that experiences are as varied as snowflakes because we all have different rooms, downstream gear, ears, tastes, etc.
 
mep said:
Here's the good news: No one is required to read any list of recommended components, but you are free to read them and bitch about them on forums.
Click to expand...

Usually people whine and bitch because someone isn't validating their purchases.
 
Audiophobiac said:
I don't know about that, but I will add that I just think Stereophoole (as I call it) and most other publications are irrelevant on the whole in my opinion. I trust their reviews as far as I can throw the building they are written in.
In my opinion, self-education and research should be the majority source. Good to ask questions of owners indeed, but keep in mind that experiences are as varied as snowflakes because we all have different rooms, downstream gear, ears, tastes, etc.
Click to expand...

I trust them no more or and no less than the so called experts who post on the various audio websites that populate the net.
 
still-one said:
I trust them no more or and no less than the so called experts who post on the various audio websites that populate the net.
Click to expand...

Yes. For me alone, I boil it down to this: After gathering just the facts on a piece of consideration, I move it to no see-ee, no hear-ee, no buy-ee. That's just my policy for me though.
 
I find most of the Stereophile and TAS reviews touch on the areas of a component's performance I want to know about, but I still do further research. Forums are somewhat helpful, but you always have opinions that are heavily biased and often contain utter nonsense. I prefer a balanced review (subjective and objective), and I respect most of the reviewers opinions (they are just opinions after all) I read on Stereophile and TAS.

People that write off all or most of the reviews in magazines usually are the ones that have heavy biases and aren't open to opinions other than their own. Their opinions are of little use to me because of their biases.
 
Projectman said:
I find most of the Stereophile and TAS reviews touch on the areas of a component's performance I want to know about, but I still do further research. Forums are somewhat helpful, but you always have opinions that are heavily biased and often contain utter nonsense. I prefer a balanced review (subjective and objective), and I respect most of the reviewers opinions (they are just opinions after all) I read on Stereophile and TAS.

People that write off all or most of the reviews in magazines usually are the ones that have heavy biases and aren't open to opinions other than their own. Their opinions are of little use to me because of their biases.
Click to expand...

My question would be how are people with heavy biases any different from reviewers in stereophile or other publications? I find them to be very heavily biased as well and of no use. Realize that reviewers review what they want to review. They are not told to review the pieces they do. They choose the pieces.
I approach it with "opinions are just that, opinions". One can agree or not. Example: Some folks like horn-loaded speakers, others (like myself) go running from the room usually. No one piece is for everyone. Just like music, some like variety and some are very narrow only liking one style, to each their own and it should never have baring on gear, even speakers unless they are not voiced for your preference.
That is why I just stick with cold hard facts as boring as it may be and then use my ears to decide what "I" think of said product and that is only for me. It has no bearing on joe blow down the street and his system. I built my system for me to listen to.
I do know a couple of reviewers (independant) with the passion and are like switzerland, totally neutral. They demo in real-world, and give you a more general findings opinion without trying to sell you and they tell you upfront it is opinion. I don't get that from publications like Stereophile, TAS, etc. I can appreciate those "neutral opinions" for what they are, but would not hang my hat on them. In fact, those guys I know flat out say not to do that! I like that kind of honesty and/or integrity.
 
Audiophobiac said:
My question would be how are people with heavy biases any different from reviewers in stereophile or other publications? I find them to be very heavily biased as well and of no use. Realize that reviewers review what they want to review. They are not told to review the pieces they do. They choose the pieces.
I approach it with "opinions are just that, opinions". One can agree or not. Example: Some folks like horn-loaded speakers, others (like myself) go running from the room usually. No one piece is for everyone. Just like music, some like variety and some are very narrow only liking one style, to each their own and it should never have baring on gear, even speakers unless they are not voiced for your preference.
That is why I just stick with cold hard facts as boring as it may be and then use my ears to decide what "I" think of said product and that is only for me. It has no bearing on joe blow down the street and his system. I built my system for me to listen to.
I do know a couple of reviewers (independant) with the passion and are like switzerland, totally neutral. They demo in real-world, and give you a more general findings opinion without trying to sell you and they tell you upfront it is opinion. I don't get that from publications like Stereophile, TAS, etc. I can appreciate those "neutral opinions" for what they are, but would not hang my hat on them. In fact, those guys I know flat out say not to do that! I like that kind of honesty and/or integrity.
Click to expand...

I go in to reading reviews with an open mind and I believe most reviewers do the same. An opinion is just that. To say that Stereophile, TAS or even your opinion has no value is like putting your head in the sand. I don't like sand in my hair and ears so I will keep my head up and be on the lookout for differing opinions and make my own decision. Perhaps audiophiles do what you do, but as an enthusiast I have my eyes wide open.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top