ArnoP
New member
- Thread Author
- #1
My set up consist of 300B SET amplifiers driving very sensitive 3-way horn loudspeakers and about most little things I tried in making small changes were audible, so along the years I have to search harder for the next improvement step.
Powerline is directly going to the system and soon, the current powerline will even be replaced by a larger diameter core cable, breaker audiophile etc.
Power conditioning, ISOTek, but trying that on the two 300B amps really killed the dynamics so it's straight into the wall socket for now.
Looking ahead, shunyata, very attractive approach of not having components put in series and trying to "block" noise. On one side there are units as the Typhon, could be paralleled to the mains, NR cables cancel noise by just plugging in one-sided and even more when fully connected and then there are the power units as Everest, Denali etc.
In my situation I would be tempted to go for 2 NR cables and connecting these to my dedicated powerline. Would this be the wrong approach or thinkable it will do the same as having a powerconditioner for these two power amps?
Powerline is directly going to the system and soon, the current powerline will even be replaced by a larger diameter core cable, breaker audiophile etc.
Power conditioning, ISOTek, but trying that on the two 300B amps really killed the dynamics so it's straight into the wall socket for now.
Looking ahead, shunyata, very attractive approach of not having components put in series and trying to "block" noise. On one side there are units as the Typhon, could be paralleled to the mains, NR cables cancel noise by just plugging in one-sided and even more when fully connected and then there are the power units as Everest, Denali etc.
In my situation I would be tempted to go for 2 NR cables and connecting these to my dedicated powerline. Would this be the wrong approach or thinkable it will do the same as having a powerconditioner for these two power amps?