Agree , It would be interesting to hear how they compare to Devialet ..
M & H did have this to say under the lettersfeedback section:
Hi guys,
ages ago I emailed you about the Devialet D-Premier if you remember? Mentioned importance of mains cabling etc. and asked you if it was worth 'upgrading' to the new (at the time) 400s? Since then I demo'ed my D-Premiers vs the 'new' models and found the latter more overtly transparent, detailed but analytical and totally lacking the tonal beauty and 'flow' of the D-Premier. Kind of like (old) solid state vs tubes. Couple of questions, please, if you have the time. What is your view on the Kalugas vs the D-Premiers? I know one will need a DAC/Pre but do you feel the Mola Molas are in a significantly higher sound class? Do the Kalugas have that sense of flow and tonal depth I love about my Devialets? What is your view on the sonics of the Mola Mola preamp? You mention it little in your review. How did it compare with your passive transformer AVC? Thanks so much and hope you're both well.
Damien Anciano
Hello Damien,
We remember! What you describe comparing D-Premier to the new models matches our impressions. Moreover, we feel the same about the later firmware versions for D-Premier; they lack what attracted us to the D-Premier when it was introduced. That plus the upgrade policy towards the new version which in our opinion deflates the initial investment in a D-Premier, not to mention the price point of the new models in respect to the second-hand value of D-Premier - all of it made us stick to our two D-Premier with the oldest version firmware possible. The sonic outcome is still satisfactory for our purposes, like one D-Premier doing chores as DAC/Amp in our TV setup while the other is commissioned for streaming background music in Marja’s workshop. In the looks department, both our D-Premier suffer from something similar to what happens to silver. The plating is oxidizing to create a nasty look. Cleaning the casing with a micro fiber cloth like the one provided by Devialet only has a temporary effect.
Onto the Kaluga. Well, they outclass the D-Premier many times. As you say, they got the flow, the dynamics and the power to control any speaker connected while being immune to cable influences and environmental radiation from other equipment in the vicinity. As the review was focussed on the power amps, our time with the Makua preamp in place only touched the surface of the capabilities. We merely used the attenuation capacity which—as we wrote—offers more steps compared to the Music First passive. Sonically there was not much difference when comparing at the same SPL in the listening spot. Makua’s ultra-silent design is on par with the passive attenuation transformers and both allow, only depending on speaker sensitivity, very low volume listening. The Makua sample we used was equipped with a phono stage and can be augmented with a Bruno-style DAC. Fine-tuning of Makua is possible by means of an app, currently (?) only available for Android devices. So when the budget allows, a full Mola Mola setup will tick all your preferences and thank you for asking, we’re doing fine!
Best,
M&H
Thanks for the response! So, to your ears, the Mola Molas have as much organic 'flow' and emotiona listeningl engagement as the original D-Premiers? Or more? And what is your take on their tonal density - again, a strength of the old Devialets with the right power cord and isolation and with Entreq grounding. Is it more 'solid state' or 'tube'/Pass in the good sense? I'm minded years ago when I bought a pair of the old Bel Canto mono 1000 on the basis of great (and I mean
great) reviews. Man, I tried to love them—they had detail, bass, a 'warm' tonal balance but in retrospect little tonal differentiation—but were they ever boring! I tried modifications through Underwood Hi-Fi, then ended up using them for TV amps.
Thanks guys,
Damien