Not sure what to get from the article, is it a review ?
"To put this concisely, part of the reason that
past Magicos have sounded a bit brightish (or sterile or analytical or cold—choose your own slur) to
some listeners is because their leaner, harder-to-generate, more “correct-on-paper” bass left their presence, brilliance, and treble range more “exposed”—at least on some kinds of music." -
JV
looks like the M-Project is still lean in the Bass,
"While a mere 0.1" larger diameter might not sound significant, it is in fact a critical difference, because it allows the tweeter to play lower into the
upper midrange without distortion (thus allowing Magico to lower the crossover point between it and the midrange driver—and simplify the crossover). According to Magico the larger diameter also allows the tweeter to play louder with lower distortion, improves treble dispersion, and eliminates
the need for a Gundry dip to disguise the crossover point." -
JV
So the speakers before had a Gundry dip ..? no distortion in the M, does this mean there was distortion before and none now, No distortion !!!
JV, may need to look more carefully before throwing this kind of stuff out ...
Additionally, 35 yrs ago we experimented with different cabinet material, (Hartley 24inch driver) we tried concrete, bass never sounded right, then Marble, Nope, just too different , I didn't but others did build with 1inch wall aluminum , nope, for some reason the bass never sounded natural until we went back to wood, .not that Wood is superior, most likely because it's what we have a reference to, when our frame of reference becomes instruments made from synthetic materials, who knows,
i think this is why some may have an issue with the Bass, from the measurements in that article, it's obviously not lean...
Then again i still find Paper superior in the mid-range when voicing.....
