Important update on vaccinations.

Status
Not open for further replies.
 
The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a “Don’t try this at home” label. The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.

The study, conducted in one of the most highly COVID-19–vaccinated countries in the world, examined medical records of tens of thousands of Israelis, charting their infections, symptoms, and hospitalizations between 1 June and 14 August, when the Delta variant predominated in Israel. It’s the largest real-world observational study so far to compare natural and vaccine-induced immunity to SARS-CoV-2, according to its leaders.



Having SARS-CoV-2 once confers much greater immunity than a vaccine—but no infection parties, please | Science | AAAS
 
Serge, If the PCR test was never intended to detect Covid, because there were never any samples to calibrate the test with, and there really is no other test, how are they determining if someone has one variant or another?

By the way, did you hear what Jen Psaki finally said out loud in a recent presser? The Truth is coming out.
 
Shadowfax said:
Yep, HCQ and Ivermectin and a few other drugs they have kept hidden from everyone in order to sell more Jabs
Click to expand...
At least in some other places around the globe, people are waking up and holding those who denied people treatment, despite large amounts of clinical data showing effectiveness, responsible for their actions and intentional misguidance.


"The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment."

Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin | Columnists | thedesertreview.com
 
TheOctopus said:
At least in some other places around the globe, people are waking up and holding those who denied people treatment, despite large amounts of clinical data showing effectiveness, responsible for their actions and intentional misguidance.


"The Indian Bar Association has warned action under section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code against Dr. Soumya Swaminathan and others, for murder of each person dying due to obstruction in treatment of COVID-19 patient effectively by Ivermectin. Punishment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code is death penalty or life imprisonment."

Indian Bar Association sues WHO scientist over Ivermectin | Columnists | thedesertreview.com
Click to expand...

Bill Gates has used India as the Clinical Study for too many years, they wised up. Time for the rest of the world to start waking up. Pfizer owns the FDA and China owns WHO.
 
Sorry guys, a little too political. Closing it down.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top