mep
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 5,095
- Thread Author
- #1
I didn't want to derail the "Monday Morning Musings" thread so I thought I would start a new thread to discuss "Gear Swapping vs. Gear Hugging." I confess I never heard of those two terms the way they were meant when I read them in the "Musings" thread. I confess that I never spent anytime before asking myself what camp I'm in. If you asked my wife, she would tell you that I swap gear so fast that it looks like a David Copperfield illusion. Compared to some of you guys, I hug gear so tight you would think it was some long lost love.
As for Mike's comment about our hobby being a journey and not a destination, I couldn't agree more and even people who would be considered gear huggers in comparison to some others would agree to some extent I would think. I know that I always want to make my system better and over the years have invested what I could afford to bring about what I hoped would be improvements to my system. And anyone who says they have never bought a piece of gear that was worse or no better than the gear it replaced is either lucky, lying, deaf, or delusional.
I think the rub for some people with regards to gear swappers (past the jealousy part of some people having the disposable income to buy pretty much anything they want anytime they want) is how quickly gear is being bought and sold. I've read more than a few comments on AS from people who said they can't keep up with how fast some guys are buying and selling gear. And these comments aren't said in a mean-spirited way, they are just telling the truth. It does seem like sometimes you are just saying "congrats" and before you blink an eye you are saying "GLWS" which I confess I never saw that acronym before I came to AS.
For many people, the key to hopefully semi-long-term satisfaction is building a system in steps where you keep trying to build on the strengths of your system. If you are constantly swapping out all of your gear, you truly have no reference system. You can call it a reference system because it's made up of reference caliber components, but you haven't had all of the gear together long enough to understand what each piece is bringing to the table before you are selling it and starting over again. It's hard to figure out how you can make rational judgements about how a new component sounds when it is surrounded by a bunch of other new components that haven't had time to even break in yet let alone let you form definitive opinions about how they sound. It's not too much different than me going to an audio show and sitting down and passing judgement on a bunch of gear I know little about-especially when put together as a system.
When Mike said that selling gear is no fun, that was the understatement of the century and you don't even have to be a gear swapper to understand that. Taking pictures of the gear, accurately describing the condition in order to keep anal retentive types happy, packing it up, shipping it after the sale, taking a beating on the price unless you are buying at accommodation prices and then dumping it on the used market, and paying all of the fees is no fun. If you are shipping large/heavy items, multiply the pain in the ass factor by 10. Due to an accident at Fed Ex, I ruptured a bicep tendon when I sold an ARC amp. Talk about no fun...
I recently (for me) bought a brand new ARC Ref 5SE and Ref 75 (March 2014). I also bought a pair of Nola KOs in March, but I have not received them yet which is another story. Those are 3 big building blocks of any system. I have no plans to dump my ARC gear anytime in the near future. I haven't had a chance to listen to all of the gear together yet, but I certainly hope I feel the same way about the KOs when they arrive and break in. Does that mean that down the road I won't be buying other gear? Absolutely not. But I guess I'm going to hug it for awhile. Unlike what Jax said, I don't believe the purpose of this hobby is to constantly swap gear and never truly have a reference system to enjoy your music with. I think the purpose of the hobby is to build a system that allows you to enjoy your music collection. Improvements in audio gear don't come with breakneck speed with the exception of DACs. All other electronics and speakers come with a much slower trend line for meaningful improvements IMO. Gear swapping is a hobby unto itself, and a damn expensive one at that.
As for Mike's comment about our hobby being a journey and not a destination, I couldn't agree more and even people who would be considered gear huggers in comparison to some others would agree to some extent I would think. I know that I always want to make my system better and over the years have invested what I could afford to bring about what I hoped would be improvements to my system. And anyone who says they have never bought a piece of gear that was worse or no better than the gear it replaced is either lucky, lying, deaf, or delusional.
I think the rub for some people with regards to gear swappers (past the jealousy part of some people having the disposable income to buy pretty much anything they want anytime they want) is how quickly gear is being bought and sold. I've read more than a few comments on AS from people who said they can't keep up with how fast some guys are buying and selling gear. And these comments aren't said in a mean-spirited way, they are just telling the truth. It does seem like sometimes you are just saying "congrats" and before you blink an eye you are saying "GLWS" which I confess I never saw that acronym before I came to AS.
For many people, the key to hopefully semi-long-term satisfaction is building a system in steps where you keep trying to build on the strengths of your system. If you are constantly swapping out all of your gear, you truly have no reference system. You can call it a reference system because it's made up of reference caliber components, but you haven't had all of the gear together long enough to understand what each piece is bringing to the table before you are selling it and starting over again. It's hard to figure out how you can make rational judgements about how a new component sounds when it is surrounded by a bunch of other new components that haven't had time to even break in yet let alone let you form definitive opinions about how they sound. It's not too much different than me going to an audio show and sitting down and passing judgement on a bunch of gear I know little about-especially when put together as a system.
When Mike said that selling gear is no fun, that was the understatement of the century and you don't even have to be a gear swapper to understand that. Taking pictures of the gear, accurately describing the condition in order to keep anal retentive types happy, packing it up, shipping it after the sale, taking a beating on the price unless you are buying at accommodation prices and then dumping it on the used market, and paying all of the fees is no fun. If you are shipping large/heavy items, multiply the pain in the ass factor by 10. Due to an accident at Fed Ex, I ruptured a bicep tendon when I sold an ARC amp. Talk about no fun...
I recently (for me) bought a brand new ARC Ref 5SE and Ref 75 (March 2014). I also bought a pair of Nola KOs in March, but I have not received them yet which is another story. Those are 3 big building blocks of any system. I have no plans to dump my ARC gear anytime in the near future. I haven't had a chance to listen to all of the gear together yet, but I certainly hope I feel the same way about the KOs when they arrive and break in. Does that mean that down the road I won't be buying other gear? Absolutely not. But I guess I'm going to hug it for awhile. Unlike what Jax said, I don't believe the purpose of this hobby is to constantly swap gear and never truly have a reference system to enjoy your music with. I think the purpose of the hobby is to build a system that allows you to enjoy your music collection. Improvements in audio gear don't come with breakneck speed with the exception of DACs. All other electronics and speakers come with a much slower trend line for meaningful improvements IMO. Gear swapping is a hobby unto itself, and a damn expensive one at that.