- Thread Author
- #1
Well on the face of it, this prototype looks like a replacement for the revered and fabulously engineered C1000T pre-amp.
Interestingly, the C1100T looks like a hybrid of the 500T and C2300/2500 designs.
Will it marry to a soon to be announced C1100C? Will several of them marry to a soon to be announced MX160? It would be exciting to contemplate the integration possibilities of the latter... We McFans talked about an MX160 wish list a few years ago now...
Obvious design differences are the apparent 3 tubes per channel for both the front porch line stage and the now exposed MM/MC phono stage tubes. The 3rd tube inclusion is the 12AT pairing with the 12AX. The photo shows a bank of 12ATs on the front porch.... For tube rollers, does this mean the end of the formidible NOS Tesla E83CC and Telefunken ECC803S NOS hunt? Plenty of cheap 12AT NOS out there still, sigh... they are not the 12AX and I am surprised to see them, in this pre-amp....
The 12AT in the phono stage is shared by both the Moving Coil and Moving Magnet circuit selections. Do the phono tubes still burn when the source is not selected in the new design? I would hope not...
It is disappointing to see McIntosh departing from their robust and beautifully crafted aluminium chassis design with the 3d facia and thick glass. The CNC and gold underlay craftsmanship of the McIntosh logo on the shielded aluminium lid is gone in favour of the cheaper tin chassis of the current mainstream product range.
The proposed flagship replacement IMO appears to be a serious departure from the classic build quality and well earned status of the C1000C/P/T. I also doubt that we will ever see the beauty of the C1000 build quality again in future McIntosh products. I hope I am proven to be wrong because it could be argued that C1000 was considered one of the best pre-amplifiers ever built in the USA.
Why depart for the cheap? IMO, McIntosh should have built on top of the successes of the entire 1000 series. Even the DAC and transport could have evolved into the relevancies of today, i.e. SACD,DSD,USB. I would have spent the money.
So as McIntosh transitions its relevance within a highly competitive global landscape in a digital consumer age, have there been further product quality design compromises under the new regime? Apparently so at the flagship level...I am therefore thankful to be and to remain the proud owner of a C1000C/T combination. I often wish that I bought more 1000 series products which I feel will become highly sort after and classic collectibles in the future.
Why the unveiling in Hong Kong? Perhaps that is where the market is now for popular American muscle?


Interestingly, the C1100T looks like a hybrid of the 500T and C2300/2500 designs.
Will it marry to a soon to be announced C1100C? Will several of them marry to a soon to be announced MX160? It would be exciting to contemplate the integration possibilities of the latter... We McFans talked about an MX160 wish list a few years ago now...
Obvious design differences are the apparent 3 tubes per channel for both the front porch line stage and the now exposed MM/MC phono stage tubes. The 3rd tube inclusion is the 12AT pairing with the 12AX. The photo shows a bank of 12ATs on the front porch.... For tube rollers, does this mean the end of the formidible NOS Tesla E83CC and Telefunken ECC803S NOS hunt? Plenty of cheap 12AT NOS out there still, sigh... they are not the 12AX and I am surprised to see them, in this pre-amp....
The 12AT in the phono stage is shared by both the Moving Coil and Moving Magnet circuit selections. Do the phono tubes still burn when the source is not selected in the new design? I would hope not...
It is disappointing to see McIntosh departing from their robust and beautifully crafted aluminium chassis design with the 3d facia and thick glass. The CNC and gold underlay craftsmanship of the McIntosh logo on the shielded aluminium lid is gone in favour of the cheaper tin chassis of the current mainstream product range.
The proposed flagship replacement IMO appears to be a serious departure from the classic build quality and well earned status of the C1000C/P/T. I also doubt that we will ever see the beauty of the C1000 build quality again in future McIntosh products. I hope I am proven to be wrong because it could be argued that C1000 was considered one of the best pre-amplifiers ever built in the USA.
Why depart for the cheap? IMO, McIntosh should have built on top of the successes of the entire 1000 series. Even the DAC and transport could have evolved into the relevancies of today, i.e. SACD,DSD,USB. I would have spent the money.
So as McIntosh transitions its relevance within a highly competitive global landscape in a digital consumer age, have there been further product quality design compromises under the new regime? Apparently so at the flagship level...I am therefore thankful to be and to remain the proud owner of a C1000C/T combination. I often wish that I bought more 1000 series products which I feel will become highly sort after and classic collectibles in the future.
Why the unveiling in Hong Kong? Perhaps that is where the market is now for popular American muscle?


Last edited by a moderator: