A bizarre review…

Mike

Audioshark
Staff member
Joined
Apr 2, 2013
Messages
30,486
Location
Sarasota, FL
Raidho TD3.8 loudspeaker | Stereophile.com

The reviewers second review?

Look at the associated equipment. Commensurate with $117k speakers?

The comments…..oh boy.

The measurements are…shall we say…rather interesting too.

As I said…bizarre.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
"So I measured them in the driveway" lol

At least he played something other than Dianna Krall..."features a screaming electric-guitar part throughout the entire song, calling to mind an Adrian Belew wannabe having an aneurysm"
Break My Heart - YouTube
 
I get he was searching for that synergy he heard in FL but I suspect theose speakers were not driven to potential.

I guess if they sounded good with what he was using, wow, if using better gear. However, I have yet to hear a "wow" demo of Raidho but I've never heard TD series to my knowledge.

He also summed it up like we should go right out and get a pair, sort of overlooking they are over $100k which is a great deal to me, LOL I think that may be the first review I've read from that writer.
 
I suppose if the writer gave a glowing review with that gear just think what the speaker might be capable of. One other thing I thought about a guy from Raidho set the speakers up so he could have suggested better gear.

I may have brands mixed up I think those tube amps used I heard in Dr Vinyl's room, they do sound very nice. Typically though speakers of that stature require some quality juice though.

I read a review this morning of the Pass XP12, the writer used used a set of Pass 60 mono blocks but I forget which exact model. I thought it odd he used as his source a Bluesound Node. This is a decent streamer/DAC to a point but come on you are reviewing a $6k preamp, I feel a higher quality DAC is in order as well the streamer. The review states he just plugged the Node into one of the inputs so he was even using that DAC.

You have to wonder if the industry has a lack of experienced reviewers. I suppose the same principle would apply as stated above, if it sounds good with a Node just imagine what it would do with a Lumin or Aurender etc. it was a positive review. Don't we sort of question a reviewers ability when they do stuff like this though?
 
I suppose if the writer gave a glowing review with that gear just think what the speaker might be capable of. One other thing I thought about a guy from Raidho set the speakers up so he could have suggested better gear.

I may have brands mixed up I think those tube amps used I heard in Dr Vinyl's room, they do sound very nice. Typically though speakers of that stature require some quality juice though.

I read a review this morning of the Pass XP12, the writer used used a set of Pass 60 mono blocks but I forget which exact model. I thought it odd he used as his source a Bluesound Node. This is a decent streamer/DAC to a point but come on you are reviewing a $6k preamp, I feel a higher quality DAC is in order as well the streamer. The review states he just plugged the Node into one of the inputs so he was even using that DAC.

You have to wonder if the industry has a lack of experienced reviewers. I suppose the same principle would apply as stated above, if it sounds good with a Node just imagine what it would do with a Lumin or Aurender etc. it was a positive review. Don't we sort of question a reviewers ability when they do stuff like this though?


I agree - the Bluesound is definitely out of place in that system.
 
The Raidho TD 3.8 will be playing at the Warsaw Audioshow this October. I am going and I will make sure I give them a good long listen.

They may be less flamboyant looking than other speakers in their price range, but I find them to look really nice.

Key point for me is to found out if they can work in medium size rooms (4m x 6m) and if they are voiced to sound sexy in the midbass - perhaps to mask lack of reel deep bass with 2 off 8 inch woofers ?

This will be exiting in any case.

Regs

Soren
 
So is it a Audiophile rule, that a person must have an expensive device that matches in dollar value the other devices ?. What if the listener enjoyed the sound of their inexpensive device. Humm!
 
So is it a Audiophile rule, that a person must have an expensive device that matches in dollar value the other devices ?. What if the listener enjoyed the sound of their inexpensive device. Humm!

I think the associated review equipment should be commensurate with the product being reviewed, yes.

Would you want a 16 year old new driver testing the performance track limits of a 992 911 Turbo S for a car magazine?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Despite what the fringe may think your audio system should be reasonably balanced in quality and ability. Most would agree to do a fair review a speaker should be driven at least close to its full potential. At least the writer realized he needed another tube amp, I still would question if 100 watts of tube gear was enough.

In addition, there's a difference between what you might do in your listening room opposed to a writer who I feel has more responsibility to the product and their reader.
So is it a Audiophile rule, that a person must have an expensive device that matches in dollar value the other devices ?. What if the listener enjoyed the sound of their inexpensive device. Humm!
 
I think the associated review equipment should be commensurate with the product being reviewed, yes.

Would you want a 16 year old new driver testing the performance track limits of a 992 911 Turbo S for a car magazine?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I would not have a problem having Josh Pierson driving my cars. FYI Josh Pierson, a full-time driver in the 2022 IMSA WeatherTech SportsCar Championship, and he was the youngest to ever race in the 24 Hours of Le Mans at age 16. :D
 
So is it an Audiophile rule, that a person must have an expensive device that matches in dollar value the other devices ?.

No, but it might be an 'Audiofool' rule :D


What if the listener enjoyed the sound of their inexpensive device. Humm!

he would be shunned for life and have his Audiophile Decoder ring confiscated ........
 
So is it a Audiophile rule, that a person must have an expensive device that matches in dollar value the other devices ?
Yes. If spend enough on source etc "quality", this becomes inaudible. I guess fringe in this case means "basic hearing ability".
823-RTD38fig3-600.jpg
 
I had Mike's same reaction when I read the review recently. Reviewers should have associated gear commensurate with the piece(s) he/she are reviewing.

Stereophile magazine is decaying quickly. These days I just page through it and, if something calls my attention, I'll read it. Doesn't take long at all.
 
When I read the review, I felt sorry for the reviewer because for his first review he is reviewing a product from a company that sparks debate no matter what. I really like the Raidho sound but it is terribly flawed. Many other products are the same way. He was put in a no win situation. As a side note: Raidho speakers in general need a LOT of power and although I've never had these in my room, I have had many other Raidho speakers in my room for extended periods of time.

If Raidho had a more conventional pricing structure and priced their products 1/2 of their current price then that would make them a lot less controversial. It's not only because of the bad specs.

That being said the reviewer going on about Q sound didn't help him much. Many speakers under $5,000 do Q sound amazingly if that's what you're into. I mean look at the sound bars for your TV movies - they throw sound to make it seem like it's all over the room.
 
Please explain how paying for a review works.

The editors control the quality of what is published in their magazine. If they buy and publish reviews with qualities that compromise its usefulness or integrity, its on them.
 
Please explain how paying for a review works.

Not sure what your question is.

I assume that the writer of the review got paid from Stereophile. Most wouldn't do it for free. By your question it almost seems like you are thinking that the manufacturer paid for the review and why would you even think that?
 
Not sure what your question is.

I assume that the writer of the review got paid from Stereophile. Most wouldn't do it for free. By your question it almost seems like you are thinking that the manufacturer paid for the review and why would you even think that?

Because that's the way it sounded to me when I initially read it.
 
Back
Top