Thread: Active Speakers - would you consider?

there are so many different active speaker approaches and different price points it's hard to have a general reaction to the concept.

if I had a lifestyle or budget need that a modest priced and minimal footprint active speaker based system accommodated then sure, why not? my wife uses a Sonus system inside the house, in the Kitchen, upstairs in the bedroom, and outside. it uses my mirroring NAS and Roon/Tidal and fits her perfectly. but she is not an audiophile and sonic quality is not her priority.

if I could live with digital only, something super simple and easy to use, and wanted top level performance then maybe a Goldmund active digital system might be the ticket.

if I wanted an uber horn system maybe the Magico Ultimate III 5 way active horns might scratch that itch.

but none of those scenarios fit my personal needs. I want a full range (and I mean full range) system that is coherent full range, and uncompromised analog sources, and I want the very best amplification I can get. that's not going to be active. my amps don't fit inside a speaker cabinet. I don't have a space limitation for active to answer that question.

if I was starting from scratch right now maybe the Goldmund direction would be a consideration.....but I'm not.

I've heard expensive active speakers sound like crap (big Meridians)......the odds of an active system really getting all the variables right is remote if the expectations are really high. at modest price points I think it makes lots of sense for those not needing upgradability.....as active is a dead-end.....to system building.

then there is resale value to consider if you do choose to upgrade. not sure active speakers are reasonable to sell. very limited market. that has to figure into 'cost to own'.

Yes, used to have the Avantgarde Zero XD.

Ultimately, I felt that the DAC section in the XD was a limiting factor instead of the active speaker concept as a whole.

This article provides some insights on the benefits of active speakers:

https://www.adam-audio.com/content/u...e-speakers.pdf

Generally speaking, active speakers can be:

* active digital systems - included DAC, DSP, crossover and amplifiers

* active analog systems - included crossover and amplifiers

These can be built into one unit or externally (which somewhat negates part of the benefits of an active system).

I prefer the analog active system as that allows the option of upgrading the source, whether analog or digital.

Having said that, the digital active system does have more flexibility in that the built-in DSP allows for frequency, impulse, etc, as well as digital room correction in one package.

I have heard one of more highly regarded digital active systems, Grimm LS1be + LS1-dmf subwoofer: https://www.grimmaudio.com/hifi-prod...peakers/ls1be/. While impressive, it sound signature (or even looks) may not suit everyone.

An active speaker does lock one into the eco-system, and limits the options to tinker with the system. It would not appeal to those who like to upgrade or build systems.

The active speaker concept is promising and eliminates a bit of the trial and error in mixing and matching components.

It would be a major boost if there were more choices for analog active speakers in, say, the US25k - 50k range.

Sure, one would be locked in onto the amplifier + speaker cable + speaker interface chosen by the manufacturer, but that still leaves room to experiment with and upgrade the source components.