Welcome to the AudioShark Forums.
Results 1 to 22 of 22
  1. #1

    Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    I'm planning to get the Job 225 amp. I can't decide if I need a powered preamp like the Job pre2, or if I'd be ok with a passive preamp like the Schitt Syst.

    My only source will be my computer, run through a dac, and I would guess that I dont need any additional gain.

    Thoughts?

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    18,726

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    My preference always is an active preamp. If you don't mind tubes, the Primaluna preamp seems like a great match
    Fleetwood Deville by Oswald Mills Audio, Vienna Acoustics Haydn Jubilee, Wharfedale Linton w/ stands, Klipsch RB-75, Klipsch RP-160M.

    Job INTegrated. Luxman L-595aSE

    NAD C 658 streamer.

    First Watt SIT-3, Job 250 Monos, NuForce STA200, AkitikA GT-102 amp, ASL Wave monos, Dennis Had 45 monos. Absolute Audio Labs PCF 25 amp (improved First Watt F7 super clone)

    Topping D90, RME Audio ADI-2 DAC FS, ModWright Ultimate Sony XA-5400ES.

    Burmester 948, McIntosh MCLK12, Kimber Kable, Siltech, Cardas, Avanti Audio cables.

  3. #3

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Thanks Joe

    I was initially thinking the same thing, but I was chatting with someone at Schitt and they were making the case for a passive amp. Here's what they said:

    In general, the less stuff you have in the chain, the better the sound—hence passive preamps. If you don’t need the gain of a traditional preamp (and you usually don’t, with line-level signals), then it’s best to go passive.
    My set up has a computer source which will never be more than a couple feet away, so it's unlikely that would introduce much impedance.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    18,726

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    There is no substitute for experiencing it for yourself. You could try it and if you like it, that's great. You'll probably gain some detail and resolution doing it that way.

    Quote Originally Posted by tedp View Post
    Thanks Joe

    I was initially thinking the same thing, but I was chatting with someone at Schitt and they were making the case for a passive amp. Here's what they said:



    My set up has a computer source which will never be more than a couple feet away, so it's unlikely that would introduce much impedance.
    Fleetwood Deville by Oswald Mills Audio, Vienna Acoustics Haydn Jubilee, Wharfedale Linton w/ stands, Klipsch RB-75, Klipsch RP-160M.

    Job INTegrated. Luxman L-595aSE

    NAD C 658 streamer.

    First Watt SIT-3, Job 250 Monos, NuForce STA200, AkitikA GT-102 amp, ASL Wave monos, Dennis Had 45 monos. Absolute Audio Labs PCF 25 amp (improved First Watt F7 super clone)

    Topping D90, RME Audio ADI-2 DAC FS, ModWright Ultimate Sony XA-5400ES.

    Burmester 948, McIntosh MCLK12, Kimber Kable, Siltech, Cardas, Avanti Audio cables.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Eastern Shore, MD
    Posts
    1,312

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Quote Originally Posted by joeinid View Post
    My preference always is an active preamp. If you don't mind tubes, the Primaluna preamp seems like a great match
    +1 Of course, you could always try the W4S STP-SE; it's both
    CD

    DAC/Pre-amp - PSAudio DsJ > Power-amp - > Speakers - PMC TwentyFive 23s

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Tallahassee, Florida/Greenville, SC
    Posts
    3,242

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    I have the STP-SE, that I bought just for the JOB, and while I will agree with the reviewers that it is quiet, dead neutral and has a wide soundstage it was missing something for me. I have been running tube preamps with either tube or SS amps for almost twenty years. I remembered that I had an as new Anthem Pre-2L in the "audio storage closet" that I hadn't used in almost ten years. It is based on the circuit of the Sonic Frontiers Line 3 which sold for well over $3000 almost 15 years ago. It has switchable gain on the board at 8, 16 or 24 db. I pulled it out of the box, stuck in a quad of Amperex Bugle Boys, set the gain at 8db and took it for a spin. To my ears it is yes not as linear, but it brought the "meat" back to the music. 8db gain is right on the borderline as you get some tube hiss within a foot of the speakers that I don't get with less sensitive amps. To me it was worth the hiss I can't hear from more than a foot away to have the "soul" of the music back. Today I packed the Anthem up to send back to Chris Johnson at Parts Connexion, to change out that known problem Noble volume pot with an Alps. My only other choice with the JOB was to put the STP-SE back in. Again while it is dead neutral, to me the excitement is gone. If I were you I would look at the Primaluna, unless you can find a used STP-SE to try at a good used price like I did.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Tallahassee, Florida/Greenville, SC
    Posts
    3,242

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Schiit's passive is only $49 so what do you have to lose?

  8. #8

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    Schiit's passive is only $49 so what do you have to lose?
    Good point, I'll give it a shot.

    Side note, does anyone have strong feelings about volume knobs that use stepped attenuator vs. a potentiometer?

    The Sys uses a potentiometer, but some people seem to be really hyped on stepped attenuators.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Ormond Beach, Plantation Bay CC
    Posts
    5,172

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jack View Post
    I have the STP-SE, that I bought just for the JOB, and while I will agree with the reviewers that it is quiet, dead neutral and has a wide soundstage it was missing something for me. I have been running tube preamps with either tube or SS amps for almost twenty years. I remembered that I had an as new Anthem Pre-2L in the "audio storage closet" that I hadn't used in almost ten years. It is based on the circuit of the Sonic Frontiers Line 3 which sold for well over $3000 almost 15 years ago. It has switchable gain on the board at 8, 16 or 24 db. I pulled it out of the box, stuck in a quad of Amperex Bugle Boys, set the gain at 8db and took it for a spin. To my ears it is yes not as linear, but it brought the "meat" back to the music. 8db gain is right on the borderline as you get some tube hiss within a foot of the speakers that I don't get with less sensitive amps. To me it was worth the hiss I can't hear from more than a foot away to have the "soul" of the music back. Today I packed the Anthem up to send back to Chris Johnson at Parts Connexion, to change out that known problem Noble volume pot with an Alps. My only other choice with the JOB was to put the STP-SE back in. Again while it is dead neutral, to me the excitement is gone. If I were you I would look at the Primaluna, unless you can find a used STP-SE to try at a good used price like I did.
    I always found my STP-SE always sounded best with tube amps, vs SS to SS
    2chl : Vincent Sp331MkII, W4S STP-SE Stage 2, Kef 201/2, KEF 140, Vapor Breeze, Lumin, Bryston CD, BHA-1, Quicksilver Headamp, HD650, HD800s, HD820's, Dan Clark 1.1, Focal Stellia, OPPO 203, 105. ( Boxed up: Pass Xa-30.5, VPI Classic, Dynavector DV-20XL, Manley Chinook, Cadenza Bronze)

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Tallahassee, Florida/Greenville, SC
    Posts
    3,242

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Chris

    I only tried mine with the Music Reference RM-10 for a short time, not really long enough to form an opinion yet. Do intend to re-visit that combo again though. The MR amp has an input sensitivity of .95 mv so should be a good enough match and might provide more midrange meat.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    270

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    I've never been able to get a passive to work as well as an active. If you can run the passive at full volume, it sounds fine. But as you turn it down, it seems like bass impact and dynamic punch both go away.

    I like detail as much as anyone else, and have yet to hear a passive that has more. Some come very close, but IME equipment matching is paramount as passives are often a lot more sensitive to cables as the impedances involved are higher.

    Some passives are lower impedance -10K- to get around this problem, but some sources are not happy driving that kind of load at all. Some are- so setup and matching is everything when it comes to successful use of a passive control.

  12. #12

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Passive preamps have one major advantage. Noise. There isn't any.
    However they have several disadvantages. You can't use long cables, they are hard to mate with some equipment, should be used with high impedance amps - low impedance amps don't like them at all. Most of the ones I have seen have been limited to only a couple of inputs, but I'm sure there are ones that have a good selection.
    Impedance matching is probably the biggest issue though.
    I've built, and sold both active and passive preamps, and have used both personally. I go for active every time. Active preamps just do the job better.
    Dan Santoni

    Authorized service for (in no particular order) - Copland, Cary, Unison Research, Allnic, Modwright, Ayon, Hegel, Belles, Aesthetix, Coincident, Zesto and a whole bunch more

    Custom Manufacturer of Blackdog HiFi.

    www.dtsaudioelectronics.com
    www.blackdoghifi.com

  13. #13

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Schitt Sys output impedance: 5k ohms maximum

    Job 225 input impedance: 51k ohms

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    270

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    The input impedance (resistance really, its just a volume control after all) is 10K. Can your source drive 10K properly?

  15. #15

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Dave Slagle's TVC may blow some of these myths out of the water

    Try one for yourselves

    Bruce

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    270

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    I am familiar with TVCs! None of what I have mentioned thus far is myth, and is not about TVCs. TVCs are a different kind of volume control, and not surprisingly, have their own set of issues, although generally speaking I think they can perform better than PVCs.

    Dave did not believe me when we had a conversation about loading and how if the transformer is not loaded correctly, it will not express its turns ratio correctly either- instead will tend to express its inter-winding capacitance (Much to his credit, when he discovered that I was correct he conceded that immediately, which, IMO is a mark of integrity). And that is the chief issue with TVCs- depending on the unit, the load for the transformer varies with the setting. This results in distortion (ringing) at some settings and a lack of flat bandwidth (due to the inter-winding capacitance taking over as the chief coupling means). As a result, TVCs are quite variable, some excellent and some underwhelming depending on how well this is addressed.

    In both the cases of PVCs and TVCs, I see them as really good examples of how badly designed some active line sections are if the passive or transformer unit comes out on top. So far I have yet to see either technology top the preamp in my system. But it is driving 30 feet of balanced interconnect cable and that might have something to do with it.

  17. #17

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Atmasphere, you beat me to it. I've only ever seen two examples of a TVC. One very expensive, who's frequency response varied quite a bit depending on how it was loaded (both source and load). However I know of one TVC that is coupled to an active preamp stage that works quite well. The TVC was designed to run a specific load and had quite good charcteristics, but did exhibit a bit of well damped ringing. Again not for everybody, but may be worth a try.
    Schitt Sys output impedance: 5k ohms maximum
    Interesting how a 10k pot can have a 5k maximum output impedance. Am I missing something here.
    Dan Santoni

    Authorized service for (in no particular order) - Copland, Cary, Unison Research, Allnic, Modwright, Ayon, Hegel, Belles, Aesthetix, Coincident, Zesto and a whole bunch more

    Custom Manufacturer of Blackdog HiFi.

    www.dtsaudioelectronics.com
    www.blackdoghifi.com

  18. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    1,021

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Quote Originally Posted by atmasphere View Post
    I've never been able to get a passive to work as well as an active. If you can run the passive at full volume, it sounds fine. But as you turn it down, it seems like bass impact and dynamic punch both go away.
    +1.

    Sometime back I bought into the theory that less is more i.e. simplify the audio path by removing gain which arguably is not necessary in some instances where active pre-amps are merely acting as attenuators to large power amplifiers.

    In theory such a passive device – assuming optimal impedance matching – should offer a level of transparency unmatched by any active pre-amp. In practise while the passive pre captured slightly more ambient detail it also sounded thin, dry and lifeless to my ears and I was completely unable to connect to the music.

    Cheers
    Ralph


    Ps. In my case I was using a Lightspeed attenuator - an LDR device.
    Borresen Acoustics Loudspeakers, Borresen Model 01 Compact monitor loudspeakers with Ansuz Darkz T2s Supreme resonance control, Audio Video Manufaktur GmbH (AVM) Inspiration amplifier & streamer, Innuos Zen MKII music server, Ansuz Acoustics cables & accessories. Please visit my system thread hosted on Audioshark for more details. Disclosure: The author is materially connected to Ansuz, Aavik & Borresen Acoustics via friendship with an owner.

  19. #19

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Quote Originally Posted by atmasphere View Post
    I am familiar with TVCs! None of what I have mentioned thus far is myth, and is not about TVCs. TVCs are a different kind of volume control, and not surprisingly, have their own set of issues, although generally speaking I think they can perform better than PVCs.

    Dave did not believe me when we had a conversation about loading and how if the transformer is not loaded correctly, it will not express its turns ratio correctly either- instead will tend to express its inter-winding capacitance (Much to his credit, when he discovered that I was correct he conceded that immediately, which, IMO is a mark of integrity). And that is the chief issue with TVCs- depending on the unit, the load for the transformer varies with the setting. This results in distortion (ringing) at some settings and a lack of flat bandwidth (due to the inter-winding capacitance taking over as the chief coupling means). As a result, TVCs are quite variable, some excellent and some underwhelming depending on how well this is addressed.

    In both the cases of PVCs and TVCs, I see them as really good examples of how badly designed some active line sections are if the passive or transformer unit comes out on top. So far I have yet to see either technology top the preamp in my system. But it is driving 30 feet of balanced interconnect cable and that might have something to do with it.

    Ralph, Pardon my inference re the Myth--poor choice of words-- I'd probably say minor anomalies that crop up with Passive V Active debates?-- Rest assured I know your products( first heard at my dear Friends Dave and Kumiko Magnan's house so many moons ago-ha!)

    plus the excellent rooms you man at the shows my opinion has not changed. Your competent replies and honesty to

    educate us "non engineer minded Philes!"is both enlightening and forthright--a rare trait I might add from some designers Long may you continue with Gusto!-- we're all ears!

    Yes I know Dave too --quirky/eccentric but his heart is in the right place--if a little over the top for the mainstream crowd--ha!

    Your comments noted and absorbed for future--thank you

    Bruce

  20. #20
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    SF Bay Area
    Posts
    73

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    I use the W4S SE preamp and I think it works great with the Job 225, which I also own. In fact, Srjaen Ebaen from 6 Moons also stated (in an email to me) that he thought those two were a very fine pairing. Since the Job has such high gain and sensitivity, you need to be careful about the gain of your preamp which is why the Job Pre has only 3 db of gain. The transparency and neutrality of the W4S is a great match for the transparency and neutrality of the Job... if you like favor those characteristics. If the recording has "soul", then you should be able to hear it, providing your source and speakers are up to to the task. Personally, I am a bit leary of equipement that injects "excitement" into every recording. even if it does not exist, since it would seem to add something (coloration?) that was not there to begin with. Just like my whiskey, give it to me straight please! ; )

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Mobile, AL
    Posts
    313

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    I've had the STP-SE almost since it came out. One of the reasons I like it is that I DIY amps, and this pre will hang well with both low and high gain amps. It easily starts passive, and if needed, slips into active if needed.

    i use Zu Essence speakers (Druid Vs on order), so a 20 watt DIY Aleph J is medium gain for me. I plan some low watt tube amp builds, and my system should adapt well.

    i also love the connectivity with this Pre, I have balanced out to both my speaker amp and headphone amp. Balanced in from phono pre and DAC.
    Amplification : Modwright LS300 - Atma-Sphere "Class D" monoblocks
    Digital : MSB Premier DAC+Digital Director, Oppo 203, Sonos Port (W4S mod)
    Analog : Technics SL1200G, Boulder 508
    Speakers : Daedalus Audio Muse Studio
    Headphone : BHSE + Voce

  22. #22

    Re: Passive vs. Powered Pre Amp — Skip the Power?

    Tedp.....I agree with Schitt's post, with the exception that the end result is the important parameter. I have tried many passives and they all were lacking compared to even a less than state of the art preamp. I suggest getting a couple to try out before you buy. Things are often not as easy or reasonable as it seems.

AudioShark - The Best High End Audio Discussion forum.

AudioShark forum is a leading forum site for High End Audio Discussion, Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater System Discussion, Best Home Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater Installation Discussion etc.

The AudioShark forum was created for sharing the passion of high-end Audio. We have Audiophiles from all over the world participating and sharing their knowledge. From novice to experts, you will find a friendly environment for discussing about High End Audio, Stereo System, Home Theater System, Home Stereo System, Home Theater Installation, Amplifiers, Speakers, Subwoofers, Integrated System, Acoustic treatments & Digital Room Corrections and many more.

At AudioShark, we also have incorporated an exciting Marketplace where members can peruse terrific buys on used gear, as well as meet dealers and discuss the purchase of new gear.

We are as crazy about this hobby as you are! So come on in and join us! Audioshark.org the Friendliest Audio Forum!

Industry Participation Disclosure : The owner and administrator of Audioshark is the owner of Suncoast Audio LLC in Sarasota Florida. Suncoast Audio has a full brick and mortar presence in Sarasota with several great show rooms with many world class brands. More information can be found at http://www.suncoastaudio.com

Audioshark is a community of like minded individuals. Audioshark welcomes participation from all manufacturers and owners of all brands and products. It is our belief that online forums provide a community of like minded audiophiles and music lovers to encourage the growth of this wonderful hobby.

Sincerely,
The Audioshark.org Team


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •