McIntosh C52 vs. C1100
Welcome to the AudioShark Forums.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like

    McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    Has anyone heard a direct comparison of the McIntosh C52 and C1100 preamps on the same system? I have the C52 coupled with the MC452 and have been very happy with it so far. My sources are all digital - PS Audio Direct Stream DAC and Bridge II streaming Tidal and Qobuz, and PS Audio DS Memory Player. My speakers are restored 1982 Klipschorns with complete Volti Audio modifications. System also includes twin SVS SB-16 subs. I keep reading that the KHorns would benefit from a tube preamp and wonder if the 2X price difference will be worth it. Any thoughts on this comparison would be appreciated.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    16,495
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    I’ve had both preamps at different times in my system. Both are awesome. In my humble opinion the C1100 is better. It has a little more bloom and air and is slightly warmer. If you can justify the price difference, it’s well worth it.
    Joe

    Misho Myronov Wooden Amp and Wooden preamp, AkitikA GT-102 power amplifier, Valvet E2, Avantgarde Duo XD, First Watt SIT-3, Luxman MQ-300, Job INTegrated, Job 250 Monos, Cary 300B SE, Klipsch RP-160M, Klipsch RB-75, ModWright Ultimate Sony XA-5400ES, ASL Wave monos, Kimber Kables, Siltech, Cardas, Avanti Audio cables, Burmester 948, Linear Tube Audio MZ2, Naim Supernait 2, Lumin U1 mini, McIntosh MCLK12, Conrad Johnson GAT2.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Tallahassee, Florida
    Posts
    2,617
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    If your in NJ why don't you see if Backert Labs is still allowing in-home trials and give the Rhumba 1.3 a try.
    Main - JVC QL-Y7/Denon Dl-301 Mk II, Gold Note PH-10, Nuprime CDT-8, Auralic Aries G1, Aqua La Voce S3, Audia Flight FL Three S , Verity Otello, (2) Rythmik F12SE, Dueland IC's, Triode Wire Labs SC & PC's, Equi=Core 1800, PI Audio Uberbuss, Timbernation rack

    Family Room - Oppo UDP-203, Teac NT-505, Nuprime DAC-10, Nuprime ST-10, Nola KO's, (2) Rythmik F-12G, Audio Sensibility SC & IC's, Neotech PC's, SurgeX SA-1810

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    42
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    This is not the comparison you were looking for, but you may be able to gleam some insight none the less.

    Having moved from a C 2500 to a C 1100 about 6 months ago yes, there is a difference certainly a cleaner, fuller sound. Before purchasing the C 2500, I did listen to the solid state counter part at the time, it may have been a c50 but not sure. I very much preferred the smoother sound of the 2500.

    The best thing is to listen to the two together. The folks at Audio Classics in Vestal, NY would be able to easily facilitate this. Depending on where you are in NJ, it could be a day trip. They may even have a pair of the Khorns around as well.
    McIntosh C-1100, MC 75's, MC 275 (lows), MR 85, MCD 205.
    Legacy Focus SE's. VPI Classic 1 w/ Denon 103R. Bryston BDP-3 & BDA-3.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    Thank you, Joe, I appreciate your input.

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    Thanks John. A trip to Audio Classics is a good idea and probably a fun day!

  7. #7
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    16,495
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    I wish the price differential was less. The C52 is a superb preamp and I loved the dac inside.

    For ultimate satisfaction and enjoyment, I really need/love tubes and what they bring to the music.

    Sure, there are other options and some were mentioned above, all great recommendations. I love the look of an all McIntosh system though and the visual appeal is undeniable.

    Please let us know what you decide.
    Joe

    Misho Myronov Wooden Amp and Wooden preamp, AkitikA GT-102 power amplifier, Valvet E2, Avantgarde Duo XD, First Watt SIT-3, Luxman MQ-300, Job INTegrated, Job 250 Monos, Cary 300B SE, Klipsch RP-160M, Klipsch RB-75, ModWright Ultimate Sony XA-5400ES, ASL Wave monos, Kimber Kables, Siltech, Cardas, Avanti Audio cables, Burmester 948, Linear Tube Audio MZ2, Naim Supernait 2, Lumin U1 mini, McIntosh MCLK12, Conrad Johnson GAT2.

  8. #8
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    My thoughts exactly, Joe. I just need to hear it to make the price difference judgment. Thanks again.

  9. #9
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    8
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    Thanks for the tip on Backert Labs, Jack. I will check into that as well.

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Hudson Valley, NY
    Posts
    42
    Post Thanks / Like

    Re: McIntosh C52 vs. C1100

    One more thing, the C 1100 does not have a built in DAC. But... you already have a well regarded DAC so no issue.
    McIntosh C-1100, MC 75's, MC 275 (lows), MR 85, MCD 205.
    Legacy Focus SE's. VPI Classic 1 w/ Denon 103R. Bryston BDP-3 & BDA-3.