Welcome to the AudioShark Forums.
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    saṃsāra
    Posts
    1,047

    minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    audiophile warning: this post contains material which some may find heretical — reader discretion is advised

    given all the recent discussion on digital source networking here, thought i would pass along my specific implementation for anyone who might be interested…

    having an asynchronous DAC but no other legacy digital source equipment, i was able to design an entire digital chain without constraint according to one overriding principle: simple and elegant solutions win.

    the resulting digital audio network configuration (red type) is as follows:

    modem <—cat7—> router <—cat7—> FMC <—fiber—> transport <—usb—> DAC

    the transport is self designed and built as a one box solution specifically to minimize the necessary supporting network infrastructure. it runs roon ROCK and provides storage, streaming, transport and rendering. consequently, the network is used only for streaming internet files (qobuz) and for control (roon iOS app). for anyone interested, more information here.

    this network configuration is implemented entirely with quality, consumer-grade networking equipment and has been transformative to the SQ of my system.

    here, the elimination of all upstream electrical noise provided by the direct input of fiber ethernet to the transport in conjunction with data correctness provided by roon’s use of TCP/IP cause me to believe that expensive audiophile networking gear such as switches, ethernet cables, power supplies, dongles, etc would provide no benefit over quality, consumer-grade gear in an audio network topology and system configuration such as this.

    furthermore, as a copper ethernet connection to the transport provides a conduit for the continuous injection of electrical noise, the fiber ethernet connection not only benefits the SQ of streamed files but also locally stored files.

    the last mile… the one outstanding item in this overall configuration is to replace the USB connection from the transport to the DAC with a fiber connection. however, to my knowledge, there is only one DAC having a non-proprietary optical fiber input. so, this upgrade will have to wait for more manufacturers to add this IO.
    _______________________________

    caveat 1: as nothing i have offered here is being taught at carnegie-mellon or cal tech… ymmv

    caveat 2: i am firmly in the camp that everything (potentially) matters and will leave open the possibility that SQ could benefit from specialized audiophile network gear. it is, however, a possibility i feel in no way compelled to investigate at this point.
    viking acoustics berlin r mk2 | air tight atc-5 + atm-300r | clearaudio concept + virtuoso v2 MM | t+a dac8 dsd + kanjiroba diy transport + roon rock
    alp-tone audio analog cables | core audio designs plyKraft 3L | hifi racks ltd podium t5-iii

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    187

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    Thanks for sharing. Is your main point that the fiber has provided the increase in SQ due to its inherent isolation?

    Have you applied / tried any LPS with any of the network components?

    There seems to be endless threads on power mgmt with regards to network specific components and then computer items (servers, streamers, endpoints, etc..)

    If one is in the everything matters camp it seems that power supply, specifically at the proper location has the potential to bring about significant improvements. Where to apply quality power is system dependent and or the big question in so far as spending $ wisely.



    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Main:
    Room: Dedicated 25 x 14 x 8 treated room | Computers (headless in utility room): Wkst #1 Ubuntu running lifetime ROON server. High end wkst #2 High end wkst running HQE image | Network rack (in utility room): Managed Fiber Switch, QNAP NAS | Endpoint: Fiber to SONORE OpticalRendu w/ LPS, Sbooster USB vbus2 |DAC: Lampi Lite7, Holo Audio S3 KTE, Aqua La Scala MKII Optologic | Pre: Atma-Sphere MP-3 Mk3.3 Pre | Amps: Pass XA100.5 Mono's | Speakers: Revel Ultima Studio2 (Townshend seismic posiums) with Dual PSA X15 sealed subs | Isolation: Components on custom roller bearings + compression springs | Cables: Wireworld Platinum USB / Analysis Plus PC / Gotham 4/4 XLR / AQ spkr / Revelation audiolabs I2s | Server Streamer: Aqua LinQ using HQP modules > I2s to Aqua La Scala


    Office: Win10 wkst with Spotify or ROON controller > VDAC-II > VLINK 192 > Yamaha RX integrated > Polk audio signature Monitors >12" sub

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,964

    minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    aKnyght

    The big part is making this fun in all of the effort, aka the hobby.

    Thanks for sharing!


    Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro
    Source Analog: Kuzma Stabi R w/4point 11 arm | Kuzma 50 Cartridge
    Source Digital: Aurender N10 | Brinkmann Nyquist MK II
    Amplification: Dan D’Agostino Momentum HD and M400’s | Boulder 508
    Speakers: Wilson Alexias
    Cabling: Nordost Leif, Norse, V2 and Odin
    Power and Isolation: Audio-Ultra Home & Room Power Foundation Performance Package with StromTank S1000 | HRS









  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    saṃsāra
    Posts
    1,047

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    Quote Originally Posted by Swisstrips View Post
    Thanks for sharing. Is your main point that the fiber has provided the increase in SQ due to its inherent isolation?

    Have you applied / tried any LPS with any of the network components?
    i think the main point is that because fiber provides complete electrical isolation, i do not have to worry about any upstream network gear beyond ensuring that it performs its intended function as per industry specifications.

    this includes power supplies. the benefit of an LPS would be to reduce extraneous electrical noise... noise which would not survive the optical isolation provided by the fiber. consequently, an LPS would be superfluous.

    in my system configuration, SQ would benefit from an LPS for the transport which is downstream from the fiber. however, my plan is to replace the USB connection from the transport to the DAC with fiber, thereby, extending optical isolation all the way to the DAC --- but, this needs to wait until more DACs include fiber IO.
    viking acoustics berlin r mk2 | air tight atc-5 + atm-300r | clearaudio concept + virtuoso v2 MM | t+a dac8 dsd + kanjiroba diy transport + roon rock
    alp-tone audio analog cables | core audio designs plyKraft 3L | hifi racks ltd podium t5-iii

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    saṃsāra
    Posts
    1,047

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    Quote Originally Posted by UltraFast69 View Post
    aKnyght

    The big part is making this fun in all of the effort, aka the hobby.

    Thanks for sharing!
    totally agree!! i found all the research to learn about the issues, principles, theories, etc. involved and then the use of that knowledge to design and build the entire digital source (network + transport) to be extremely enjoyable. then to switch it on and hear the results which exceeded all expectations to be fully satisfying. i am just sad that process is now close to being over.
    viking acoustics berlin r mk2 | air tight atc-5 + atm-300r | clearaudio concept + virtuoso v2 MM | t+a dac8 dsd + kanjiroba diy transport + roon rock
    alp-tone audio analog cables | core audio designs plyKraft 3L | hifi racks ltd podium t5-iii

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Location
    MN
    Posts
    187

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    Quote Originally Posted by aKnyght View Post
    i think the main point is that because fiber provides complete electrical isolation, i do not have to worry about any upstream network gear beyond ensuring that it performs its intended function as per industry specifications.

    this includes power supplies. the benefit of an LPS would be to reduce extraneous electrical noise... noise which would not survive the optical isolation provided by the fiber. consequently, an LPS would be superfluous.

    in my system configuration, SQ would benefit from an LPS for the transport which is downstream from the fiber. however, my plan is to replace the USB connection from the transport to the DAC with fiber, thereby, extending optical isolation all the way to the DAC --- but, this needs to wait until more DACs include fiber IO.
    Yes agreed and I think that is the "general" consensus however, there is never really any consensus/agreement in this hobby

    I'm also running fiber on my home network (home and listening room) and am discovering a fair amount of info that still suggest LPS will still benefit (server source, switches, NAS) but as with anything its really up to the indiv to experiment and determine if the $ is worth it.

    I'm looking to replace/upgrade my mU to something else and in the process of researching this, it really opens up a can O worms, thus my comments above on LPS.

    A relatively inexpensive item to try would be the sonore optical modules to replace the consumer grade FMC's and would ideally need two - one at the switch and one at DAC. My L2 managed switch is AC powered and has two SFP ports but even in this instance, "they" say go Ethernet out of switch > optical module > fiber > 2nd optical module > streamer.

    OR as an alternative fiber from switch (in network rack in my configuration) to a "dumb" switch (in audio rack) from some of newly developed "audiophile" type of switches (sotm, uptone, liner solution). These audiophile switches offer "better" clocking/isolation but are $ so a lot of available choices.
    Main:
    Room: Dedicated 25 x 14 x 8 treated room | Computers (headless in utility room): Wkst #1 Ubuntu running lifetime ROON server. High end wkst #2 High end wkst running HQE image | Network rack (in utility room): Managed Fiber Switch, QNAP NAS | Endpoint: Fiber to SONORE OpticalRendu w/ LPS, Sbooster USB vbus2 |DAC: Lampi Lite7, Holo Audio S3 KTE, Aqua La Scala MKII Optologic | Pre: Atma-Sphere MP-3 Mk3.3 Pre | Amps: Pass XA100.5 Mono's | Speakers: Revel Ultima Studio2 (Townshend seismic posiums) with Dual PSA X15 sealed subs | Isolation: Components on custom roller bearings + compression springs | Cables: Wireworld Platinum USB / Analysis Plus PC / Gotham 4/4 XLR / AQ spkr / Revelation audiolabs I2s | Server Streamer: Aqua LinQ using HQP modules > I2s to Aqua La Scala


    Office: Win10 wkst with Spotify or ROON controller > VDAC-II > VLINK 192 > Yamaha RX integrated > Polk audio signature Monitors >12" sub

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2018
    Location
    saṃsāra
    Posts
    1,047

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    agreed... all theories need to stand up to empirical confirmation. plenty of room for experimentation!!

    Quote Originally Posted by Swisstrips View Post
    A relatively inexpensive item to try would be the sonore optical modules to replace the consumer grade FMC's and would ideally need two - one at the switch and one at DAC. My L2 managed switch is AC powered and has two SFP ports but even in this instance, "they" say go Ethernet out of switch > optical module > fiber > 2nd optical module > streamer.
    i am not sure the sonore OM would add anything over the SFP ports on an upstream switch... the electrical>optical signal conversion is the last thing that takes place (in the SFP transceiver not the OM). anything upstream of that is irrelevant for the purposes discussed here. on the downstream end, the OM could be beneficial if its circuitry post optical>electrical conversion by the SFP module is less noisy -- which i suspect might be the case.

    Quote Originally Posted by Swisstrips View Post
    ...as an alternative fiber from switch (in network rack in my configuration) to a "dumb" switch (in audio rack) from some of newly developed "audiophile" type of switches (sotm, uptone, liner solution). These audiophile switches offer "better" clocking/isolation but are $ so a lot of available choices.
    certainly worth trying to find out empirically. my a priori thoughts would be that:

    > the isolation could only be as good as fiber but, most likely not.

    > the "better" clock would add nothing to SQ... for an asynchronous DAC, the only clock that matters is the one on the DAC used to time the audio stream being feed directly to the digital-to-analog conversion circuity (chip). all other clocks/clocking in the digital chain are used for more mundane things like network data transmission, process scheduling, operation of the CPU, etc...

    ...more generally: as long a piece of network gear faithfully implements its respective industry standards/protocols and operates within specifications, full interoperation with and full functionality of audio devices (i.e. DAC) is guaranteed. however, this breaks down when a piece of audio gear requires network gear to function beyond its industry specifications to achieve full performance… and, i would argue that such audio gear has not been fully designed or adequately specified.

    again, all this is just my theory ...ymmv
    viking acoustics berlin r mk2 | air tight atc-5 + atm-300r | clearaudio concept + virtuoso v2 MM | t+a dac8 dsd + kanjiroba diy transport + roon rock
    alp-tone audio analog cables | core audio designs plyKraft 3L | hifi racks ltd podium t5-iii

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Neutral Zone
    Posts
    558

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    If you’d like to experiment with fiber isolation, here is a way to do it that won’t break the bank. Buy two of these:
    TP-Link Fast Ethernet SFP to RJ45... Amazon.com

    Buy one of these:
    2 Meter OM1 Multimode Duplex... Amazon.com

    Total cost is $55.

    Buy the linear power supply of your choice, 9V 500mA, to use on the ‘silent’ end of this fiber break.

    I have seen a marked improvement using this low cost solution. I built my own 9V linear supply for a few dollars. I can share if others are interested.
    Tom

    Audio:
    Amati Futura Mains
    Amati Homage VOX Center,
    Proac Response 1sc Rears,
    Three MC2301's for L,C,R
    MC 602 for the rears
    C 1100, MX 151, MCD 1100, MR 77
    Nottingham Dais with Sumiko Palo Santos Presentation
    SurfacePro 3, JRiver, WW Starlight Platinum USB, Schiit Yggdrasil, Benchmark DAC3 HGC

    Video:
    MX 151, OppO BDP-95, JVC RS-500 DILA projector, 106" diagonal Stewart Luxus Screenwall Deluxe with Studiotek 130 G3 material.

    Lake House:
    Ohm F, MC 275V, C2300, MR 80, Rega P3

    OnDeck:
    McIntosh MAC 4300v

  9. #9

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    I am always curious by all the talk about ‘electrical noise’ that somehow some folks can “hear” that benefits from isolation to the point that it generates all kind of accolades.
    I would love to see some graph and/or objective measurements and test results that actually show and quantify this noise.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    The Neutral Zone
    Posts
    558

    Re: minimalist network configuration for a digital source

    I am working on a way to instrument this end-to-end on my system - that is from a test file stored on my NAS, played through Roon, to various endpoints/DAC’s and then into my Audio Precison System 222A analyzer. It’s still a work in progress. It would be nice to validate what I’m hearing.
    Tom

    Audio:
    Amati Futura Mains
    Amati Homage VOX Center,
    Proac Response 1sc Rears,
    Three MC2301's for L,C,R
    MC 602 for the rears
    C 1100, MX 151, MCD 1100, MR 77
    Nottingham Dais with Sumiko Palo Santos Presentation
    SurfacePro 3, JRiver, WW Starlight Platinum USB, Schiit Yggdrasil, Benchmark DAC3 HGC

    Video:
    MX 151, OppO BDP-95, JVC RS-500 DILA projector, 106" diagonal Stewart Luxus Screenwall Deluxe with Studiotek 130 G3 material.

    Lake House:
    Ohm F, MC 275V, C2300, MR 80, Rega P3

    OnDeck:
    McIntosh MAC 4300v

AudioShark - The Best High End Audio Discussion forum.

AudioShark forum is a leading forum site for High End Audio Discussion, Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater System Discussion, Best Home Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater Installation Discussion etc.

The AudioShark forum was created for sharing the passion of high-end Audio. We have Audiophiles from all over the world participating and sharing their knowledge. From novice to experts, you will find a friendly environment for discussing about High End Audio, Stereo System, Home Theater System, Home Stereo System, Home Theater Installation, Amplifiers, Speakers, Subwoofers, Integrated System, Acoustic treatments & Digital Room Corrections and many more.

At AudioShark, we also have incorporated an exciting Marketplace where members can peruse terrific buys on used gear, as well as meet dealers and discuss the purchase of new gear.

We are as crazy about this hobby as you are! So come on in and join us! Audioshark.org the Friendliest Audio Forum!

Industry Participation Disclosure : The owner and administrator of Audioshark is the owner of Suncoast Audio LLC in Sarasota Florida. Suncoast Audio has a full brick and mortar presence in Sarasota with several great show rooms with many world class brands. More information can be found at http://www.suncoastaudio.com

Audioshark is a community of like minded individuals. Audioshark welcomes participation from all manufacturers and owners of all brands and products. It is our belief that online forums provide a community of like minded audiophiles and music lovers to encourage the growth of this wonderful hobby.

Sincerely,
The Audioshark.org Team

minimalist network configuration for a digital source

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •