Search:

Which is why I said something was wrong.

Your original post said the frequency response cut off at 700 Hz. The new chart you just posted says 700,000 Hz.

The stated frequency response can't be correct.

Hope is never a good business strategy. It remains to be seen what is in store for Gryphon in the U.S. moving forward.

Thanks. That makes sense.

Do you mean new red book recordings Rob?

Oh, please Mr. Sensitive. If someone doesn't agree with something a friend of yours says about his $50k table in comparison to his digital rig you are going to pack up and leave?

It was your comment about your buddy with the $50k table.

There is something very wrong with that comment.

You sure have a lot of wants. You posted this same laundry list on AN under a different name-justin156

It’s hopeless Ralph. He’s getting to be a clone of Ethan Winer.

Now you are confusing someone that points out obvious errors with statements you were trying to present as “facts” with condescension. It’s hopeless to have a meaningful dialog with you. Uncle.

You should have put quotes around your post because you lifted every word directly from the link you posted. Measuring loudness levels in a new way is not tied to the discussion you were trying to...

Really? We have no recordings that exceed 40 dB of dynamic range???? I need to prove that to you??

Someone speaking in a normal volume in a conversation is never going to come close to the DR of well recorded music. It’s a loser argument for you. You need to try something else.

Serge- You are confusing loudness with DR. Of course you can speak at a whisper or you can scream. If you are speaking in a monotone voice, by definition you aren’t changing the DR of your voice.

Great deflection, but that’s not what we were talking about. You just switched gears from someone speaking in a monotone voice and claiming a monotone voice which by definition has zero DR has more...

That's not possible unless they cherry picked 1,000 songs recorded during the loudness wars.

Complete and total nonsense. Jazz recordings are known for their dynamic range and their lifelike sound.

So if jazz is such a headache for you, why did you bother to play the recording?

Joe has to buy that Jeep.

Analog vs. digital threads are always a train wreck. I’m way beyond trying to convince anyone of the superiority of one format over another. What shouldn’t be debatable is that there are no SQ...

Yeah AJ. I’m really going to hop on a plane to fly to Florida to listen to a system of unknown components to subject myself to your version of a test which doesn’t consist of listening to an LP...

You and your tests...

I would trust you as much as I would trust Ethan Winer to conduct a test which is a trust factor of 0.0.

Yeah, Fremer's video said "everyone" was blown away at how much better the LP sounded. It's hard to believe that you could play an LP for "everyone" and "no one" can tell the differences between the...