RonR
New member
- Thread Author
- #1
I have enjoyed Martin-Logan speakers since 1989. I had Monolith Is (obviously I am not too sensitive to panel/cone discontinuity! then Monolith IIIs, then Prodigys (which I still own and love). A long time Martin-Logan dealer told me today that he is dropping the manufacturer because he feels the quality of the products has gone down across the board, including with respect to the CLX. He showed me a pair of CLXs manufactured in 2014 which, he said, manifest shoddy workmanship. I rocked the speakers back and forth and they did seem a little chintzy.
I have notes about advice jim Powers gave me going back to 1998. It certainly is not a good sign that Jim is no longer at ML.
I have assumed that whatever the new owner's business model with respect to inexpensive products sold in mass-market electronics stores, the company would nonetheless treat their high-end audio products produced in Canada (e.g., CLX Art) as a separate business with a traditional ML level of build quality, quality control and support. I would think it obvious that this has to be their thinking with regard to the Neolith.
Is my assumption incorrect?
Is there any factual evidence to support the proposition that manufacturing quality in even the CLX has declined?
I have notes about advice jim Powers gave me going back to 1998. It certainly is not a good sign that Jim is no longer at ML.
I have assumed that whatever the new owner's business model with respect to inexpensive products sold in mass-market electronics stores, the company would nonetheless treat their high-end audio products produced in Canada (e.g., CLX Art) as a separate business with a traditional ML level of build quality, quality control and support. I would think it obvious that this has to be their thinking with regard to the Neolith.
Is my assumption incorrect?
Is there any factual evidence to support the proposition that manufacturing quality in even the CLX has declined?