Klipsch La Scala II ?

Man, I can't imagine La Scala IIs with the 15" passive needing a sub. Not that adding a sub would be bad. That wouldn't be a problem for me as I have two SVS subs that I'm using on two separate HT systems. But I wouldn't think La Scala IIs would need a sub? OTOH, I've never heard La Scala IIs so I could be wrong. Hmm...imagine that.

bluegrassphile said:

Man, I can't imagine La Scala IIs with the 15" passive needing a sub. Not that adding a sub would be bad. That wouldn't be a problem for me as I have two SVS subs that I'm using on two separate HT systems. But I wouldn't think La Scala IIs would need a sub? OTOH, I've never heard La Scala IIs so I could be wrong. Hmm...imagine that.

Click to expand...

The woofer rolls off at 51Hz. Subs are needed unless you don’t care about the bottom octave.

I have had 2 sets of La Scalas over the last 40 years. I moved to Martin Logans, Cerwin Vegas, Paradigms, JBls (Not in antbparticular order, as I have had La Scalas twice over the 40 years along with other brands), and now back to Klipsch again. This time in am going with modified K402s for my 3 front channels, rp160ms for 4 surrounds, and 4-6 rp150ms for height channels. I am not sure what I will do for subs this time though.

Point being I love Klipsch, and these will be my final speakers.

Sent from my SM-T550 using Tapatalk