Bladelius ASK Integrated amplifier

brodricj

Active member
Joined
Apr 5, 2017
Messages
1,814
Location
Australia
Greetings fellow sharks!

A Bladelius ASK landed on my front door step this morning. It's one of these:

Bladelius - ASK Integrated

It is now connected to only three things. My Shunyata Everest. My Magico M3 speakers. And my network router. A power cable. A pair of speaker cables. And a network cable. That is all.

What was connected to my M3's as of an hour ago was a seven box Esoteric Grandioso stack, Halcro reference monoblocks, a plethora of ridiculously expensive cables too many to count, and heavens knows what else. That whole shooting match weighs in at over 300kg and is worth about $300K.

The diminutive Bladelius ASK weighs in at a meager 20kg and is worth about $20K (with the optional DAC module). The weight of it is less than half the weight of the YG rack alone that carries all my other aforementioned electronics.

I eventually worked out how to configure the Bladelius ASK as a Spotify Connect device and now I'm streaming my favorites list on Spotify using an iPhone 6 as the controller. The sound and the simplicity of it is compelling. Actually, it's incredible. You couldn't want for anything more in the audiophile experience. And there is the dilemma. How can this single box possibly compete with the flagship Esoteric at >10 times the price? I'm here to tell you it's close. It's so close I'm in no rush to switch back to the main system. And it's not even their flagship integrated amp.

If you're in the market for a single box that does it all the Bladelius ASK should be on your radar. It's off the price vs performance Richter scale and gets my highest recommendation.

Screen Shot 2023-09-08 at 18.21.57.png
 
Very interesting! Have heard the brand in passing but haven't paid much attention.
Just took a look at their website. Are they Swedish? They don't mention an address.

There is a lot to be said IMO on simplifying the chain. I tried the JOB INT integrated several years ago and it was a complete revelation. These new integrateds with digital inputs are like Swiss Army Knives offering a ton of flexibility. Given the huge savings in box count and dollars it does cause one to pause and consider.


.
 
Yep, Swedish. Build quality of the unit is very good and the aesthetics are pleasing, but the volume knob looks a bit unconventional. The remote control is plastic rubbish, lucky I only use it for volume control. The ASK owners manual is very basic and scant on detail. Packaging is quite good with the wooden crate. The simplicity of it is bliss. My A system needs seven power cables to power the boxes that perform the same function as ASK. Plus all the interconnects. The flagship integrated Bladelius Oden Mk2 will debut next month. I tell you what, I reckon Oden Mk2 + Magico S3 will probably slay anything twice the price. ASK has a cheap Raspberry Pi module running the network audio side. I can't imagine how good it might sound if Bladelius put a tricked up Lumin U2 module in there instead.
 
I really like the "simple approach" as you've described here, Brodric. I've had a very similar experience when moving from my previous set-up to the Lumin P1 + an integrated amp.

Similar to yours, it only requires a minimum of cables and such: 1 pair of ICs, two PCs, 1 optical cable, and a set of speaker cables.

Nice this is: it always works and sounds fab.
 
After seven hours of listening last night I remained very impressed by the sound. But at the end of that the case of the ASK integrated was too hot to touch, which is a worry. My Halcro monoblocks have slightly higher power output rating than ASK integrated, but its heatsinks are about 10+ times the size and get barely warm to the touch.
 
I've dialed down the Class A bias on ASK from high to low. The chassis temperature has gone from too hot to touch, to comfortably warm to touch. I'm going to keep it there, especially with summer just around the corner.
 
I bought Magico A3 and Bladelius ASK as a simple system for my mum. But she didn't want it so I kept it.
 
The dilemma I'm facing is this Bladelius ASK sounds better than the Estoteric Grandioso stack. Despite having a vast CD collection and a Grandioso transport to spin them in most of my music listening is Spotify. I had been using a Playstation 3 as my Spotify source for the Esoteric up until a month ago when Spotify support on PS3 ended. I keep coming back to this ASK because it sounds better and it's simple. Power cable, network cable and speaker cables. That's it. One button turns it on and 30 seconds later you're underway. Simplicity is bliss. What this is telling me is I need a better Spotify source for my Esoteric. Or just be content with this ASK. It really is very impressive as a single box option.
 
Your esoteric set should be beating the ASK easily, can only imagine there are bottlenecks in your system.

I know that my Moon 700i is the "weakest" link in my system, but with optimizing the front end, power supply and internet stuff I am pretty sure I have maximized the SQ in my room.
 
I'm waiting for Esoteric to release a new network transport to replace N-03T. The bottleneck was the Playstation PS3 source I was using with the Esoteric, but which I can't use any more because Spotify is no longer supported. Hence why I'm now listening to Spotify on ASK.
 
Spotify Premium resolution. On the ASK Spotify can sound as good as spinning a disc in my Grandioso transport.
 
I have heard others say that Spotify Premium sounds surprisingly good relative to higher resolution streaming services. I am 100% CD/SACD via an Esoteric K-01XD (not the equal of a current Grandioso stack), so my only comparative streaming experience is with a friend's Esoteric K-01XS player receiving Qobuz via an Innuos ZENith Mk3/PhoenixUSB. The difference to my ears between playing even a moderate quality classical CD on his player vs. streaming it at CD rate was immediately apparent - in favor of playing the local physical CD (both cases using the K-01XS's DAC). The difference was less pronounced playing a locally stored CD from the Innuos, but still favored playing the physical CD. My friend's USB network may not be the equal of more optimized networks from other forum members, but this is the only data point I have. As usual, YMMV.
 
Instead of waiting around to see what Esoteric is or isn't going to do with Lumin's streaming technology in the future why not just buy a U2 now and be done.
 
Instead of waiting around to see what Esoteric is or isn't going to do with Lumin's streaming technology in the future why not just buy a U2 now and be done.

I've asked Bladelius if they can add a feature to the next software release to enable/disable the power amplifier section. With the power amp disabled I can use ASK as a network transport (Spotify Connect device) using the Loop Out RCA connected to my Grandioso C1X. In the meantime I can still use ASK as a network transport but the power amp at idle without speakers connected still generates heat even in low bias mode.
 
Here we go, ASK configured as a network transport. Sort of. Except it's an RCA analog output to the C1X instead of a digital output to the D1X. Aesthetically ASK sits nicely with the Esoteric gear.

Screen Shot 2023-10-24 at 23.13.13.png
 
I can't yet say I prefer one configuration over the other. It's more complicated than a single change to the system. ASK is not powered from Shunyata Everest in this configuration, it's powered from a PixiR BAC3000 isolation transformer. The RCA jacks on the back of ASK are too close together for my good cables to fit (the cable barrels are too wide for both to connect in the narrow space between the jacks). So I've had to use a $2 RCA video cable to make one of the connections. But I do like the convenience of not having to swap speaker cables any more.
 
Back
Top