Momentum HD vs Arc Ref40 Preamp

same brand pre and power rocks!

For reference purposes, I used to have an ARC Ref 5SE with a DAG S200. As much as I liked the 5SE, the change to the Momentum Pre was well worth it. The DAG synergy is special.

I have since updated the Pre to the HD version and the amp to the S250 edition.

Agreed re synergy of having the same brand, although sometimes the warmth of a valve pre-amp with a solid state amplifier works extremely well.

When I changed my amplifiers from the ARC Ref250SE's to the M400's I was amazed by the improvement, especially in areas where I though the ARC's would at least match the Momentum's.

I am kind of thinking the same here, the ARC pre-amp should do some things better than the Momentum HD but with experience on the amplification change this may not end up being the case.

The ARC preamp I have, the anniversary edition is rather special, so be good to see if anyone else has tried the change with this in place.

Thanks for your replies
Marc.

Marc - Indeed, the ARC Ref40 is special. Do you have a DAG dealer near your home? Well worth doing an audition with the rest of your system in your environment.

Ritmo said:

Marc - Indeed, the ARC Ref40 is special. Do you have a DAG dealer near your home? Well worth doing an audition with the rest of your system in your environment.

Click to expand...

Hi Mike,

Yep I do, just didn't want to start down that road until had some ideas of benefits etc ��.

Will schedule the demo though now! After have done so will report back findings
Thanks
M.

Hi Mark,
Yes I have done exactly what you are contemplating. I had the Ref 40 for 9 great years and never thought I would change this piece in my system (yes, audiophile naivete!). I have an s250 feeding M3s and the Ref 40 seemed to work really well with this. Then I had an opportunity to hear the Momentum HD at home. In only took a few minutes to tell that the Momentum was a much better match in my system. Frankly the improvement was shocking. I suspect their is synergy here between the preamp and amp but I also think that the Momentum HD is just a superior preamp as it should be at its price and more recent design. Jon Valin has described a fine grain to the sound of older ARC gear which I never understood till it was gone with the HD. More detail, better bass and broader sound stage. I could go on but I would probably have to go online and consult the "audiophile cliche generator." Don't hesitate to have an in-home audition and I would be surprised if you don't agree.

Milt said:

Hi Mark,
Yes I have done exactly what you are contemplating. I had the Ref 40 for 9 great years and never thought I would change this piece in my system (yes, audiophile naivete!). I have an s250 feeding M3s and the Ref 40 seemed to work really well with this. Then I had an opportunity to hear the Momentum HD at home. In only took a few minutes to tell that the Momentum was a much better match in my system. Frankly the improvement was shocking. I suspect their is synergy here between the preamp and amp but I also think that the Momentum HD is just a superior preamp as it should be at its price and more recent design. Jon Valin has described a fine grain to the sound of older ARC gear which I never understood till it was gone with the HD. More detail, better bass and broader sound stage. I could go on but I would probably have to go online and consult the "audiophile cliche generator." Don't hesitate to have an in-home audition and I would be surprised if you don't agree.

Click to expand...

Hi,

Thank you so much for your response.

I concur, the saying ‘this is one piece that will
never leave the system’, seems to be something which we audiophiles should never really state!!

All I know is that when I did the demo for the mono M400’s I was shocked at the difference. Again for the cost uplift you kind of expect it to be better but that as we know in this hobby does not always equate to better!

From what you mention above and the similar equipment you had / have as me, I’m sure I will conclude the same as you.

Right, now to arrange the home demo [emoji106][emoji106]. Will report back findings.

Thanks again
Marc.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Please do report your findings.
l have seen many posts of people preferring tube/SS pairing and I suspect it depends on many factors (brand, speakers, room, cabling etc,).

gshelley said:

Please do report your findings.
l have seen many posts of people preferring tube/SS pairing and I suspect it depends on many factors (brand, speakers, room, cabling etc,).

Click to expand...

So I agree with the above, however after having my M400's in place, they provide the warmth of the valves and the power and grip of solid state. So I am thinking if that is anything to go by then the preamp will only add to this... We shall see ��

One other question, do you think there will be a new pre-amp which will be produced for the Relentless (although it will be a different price level I should imagine)? Maybe trickle down into a further update to the Momentum HD?
Thoughts?

Marck1973 said:

One other question, do you think there will be a new pre-amp which will be produced for the Relentless (although it will be a different price level I should imagine)? Maybe trickle down into a further update to the Momentum HD?
Thoughts?

Click to expand...

Yes I was talking to Dan at the world introduction to for the XVX speakers and he hopes to have it ready for the Munich show. I am looking forward to seeing the design. Multiple boxes if I remember correctly.

Have you seen the latest Stereophile and Jason Serinus's review of the Momentum HD? In the text of the article, there is a mini interview with Dan D'Agostino wherein Dan mentions that many of the improvements to the HD version came from his developmental efforts of the Relentless preamp, so the HD IS the trickle down. BTW, Serinus wrote a very positive review of the Momentum HD and preferred it to his ARC Ref 6 by a substantial margin. Of course, he might be considered as biased towards D'Agostino products based on his rave review of the Progression monoblocks that are currently in his system.

Hi Jim,
So I should imagine at a completely different price level, more in keeping with one of the Relentless mono’s!! Be interesting to see what it is though. Munich isn’t that far away now
Thanks
M.

Thanks for the heads up re the review, will take a read of that. I did hear the HD incorporated trickle down from the Relentless. Was wondering if he had uncovered other areas when building the new Relentless preamp. Suppose we will see soon.

I would say the Ref6 to HD is probably not a fair comparison. Maybe Ref10 or Ref40 be better, but even still should imagine the resulting analysis would be the same. I will find out soon!!

M.

Marck1973 said:

Thanks for the heads up re the review, will take a read of that. I did hear the HD incorporated trickle down from the Relentless. Was wondering if he had uncovered other areas when building the new Relentless preamp. Suppose we will see soon.

I would say the Ref6 to HD is probably not a fair comparison. Maybe Ref10 or Ref40 be better, but even still should imagine the resulting analysis would be the same. I will find out soon!!

M.

Click to expand...

Yes, I suspect the Relentless preamp will be a four box affair and probably 80K or more....maybe a lot more.
I know that D'Agostino is also working on the Progression integrated to be released soon. It will be offered at a very attractive price, by D'Agostino standards.
Yes Marc, do let us know what you think of the Momentum HD. I am smitten by it.

Milt said:

Yes, I suspect the Relentless preamp will be a four box affair and probably 80K or more....maybe a lot more.
I know that D'Agostino is also working on the Progression integrated to be released soon. It will be offered at a very attractive price, by D'Agostino standards.
Yes Marc, do let us know what you think of the Momentum HD. I am smitten by it.

Click to expand...

I reckon way more than £80k, probably closer to the £125k of a mono amp! So not in my league!!

Will let you know, I think I will be rather smitten too....
M.

U might want to think about this:

Get rid of the dCS stack and REF40 preamp. Move to an MSB SelectII and use it as your preamp as well as your dac. I think you'll be amazed at the improvement. Then get the MSB M500 amps......then you'll have amazing synergy...

Kingsrule said:

U might want to think about this:

Get rid of the dCS stack and REF40 preamp. Move to an MSB SelectII and use it as your preamp as well as your dac. I think you'll be amazed at the improvement. Then get the MSB M500 amps......then you'll have amazing synergy...

Click to expand...

Thanks for the suggestion, although wont be getting rid of my DCS Vivaldi stack, I think it is superb. Also the M400's are just something else, best amps I have ever heard / had in my system by a long way.

M.

Hi,

So I managed to obtain a demo unit and had this in place for a week or so before it was returned to the dealer, hence I wanted to provide an update.

The look, build and quality of the unit was amazing – the meter for the volume control was just superb.

So in some areas I thought the preamp was excellent, such as the detail and control. The bass was much better focussed too. These were definitely better than the ARC Ref40 unit.

However, the soundstage was not that large to start with and although it did improve over the initial couple of days, it never really opened up. The soundstage was always limited between the speakers – the system had lost its air, naturalness and sparkle. It sounded maybe more accurate but more clinical.

We swapped the ARC back at the end and the soundstage and airiness returned (minus that detail and control to some extent).

In summary and being honest I was actually disappointed. I had expected the D’Agostino to excel in all areas and simply blow the ARC away, but it didn’t.

I did query with the local distributor if this was what they expected or if there happened to be any other issue (such as compatibility of some type) that caused my above findings. The only response was that it was not valves and hence possibly the difference in presentation.

Although this is true, I used to have the ARC Ref250SE amplifiers before the Momentum M400’s and the M400’s were substantially better than the ARC in every way, valves or no valves!

Has anyone else found this when trying the preamp? Any other ideas welcome! I am kind of wanting to re-try again when we are back to a more normal way of life and have the distributor here so he can come and hear it.

Thanks and stay safe
M.