Welcome to the AudioShark Forums.
Results 1 to 25 of 25
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,381

    AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Has anyone done a direct comparison of the AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000? If so, can you articulate the difference in sound quality?

    Thanks,
    Ken
    "No summit worth climbing is easily attained."
    --------------------------------------------
    Source: MSB Select II DAC with Two Mono Powerbases and Femto 33 Clock; Renderer V2 Digital Input Module and Roon Nucleus Plus; MSB UMT V Signature Transport
    Amps: Vandersteen M7-HPA Mono Amps; MSB M204 Mono Amps
    Speakers: Vandersteen Model 7 Mk2
    Power: Two AudioQuest Niagara 5000’s with AudioQuest Dragon and Hurricane Power Cords

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago suburbs
    Posts
    1,583

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Hey Ken - Thought you may have missed these related threads since they're not in the AQ forum, being in "Power Conditioners & Regulators":
    AudioQuest Niagara 7000 Low-Z Power-Noise Dissipation System- Don’t Call It a Power Conditioner
    AudioQuest Niagra 5000
    http://www.audioshark.org/showthread...l=1#post187278

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,381

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by audio.bill View Post
    Hey Ken - Thought you may have missed these related threads since they're not in the AQ forum, being in "Power Conditioners & Regulators":
    AudioQuest Niagara 7000 Low-Z Power-Noise Dissipation System- Don’t Call It a Power Conditioner
    AudioQuest Niagra 5000
    http://www.audioshark.org/showthread...l=1#post187278
    Thanks Bill,

    I read those threads and there seems to be an issue with tube components being plugged into the 7000’s low current outlets (humming), which go through its transformer. However, the high current outlets on the 7000 don’t go through the transformer. Since my amplifiers are my only components with tubes and are plugged into the high current outlets, in theory, the 7000 should provide more noise reduction to my Select II DAC than the 5000 and still not hum.

    Ken
    "No summit worth climbing is easily attained."
    --------------------------------------------
    Source: MSB Select II DAC with Two Mono Powerbases and Femto 33 Clock; Renderer V2 Digital Input Module and Roon Nucleus Plus; MSB UMT V Signature Transport
    Amps: Vandersteen M7-HPA Mono Amps; MSB M204 Mono Amps
    Speakers: Vandersteen Model 7 Mk2
    Power: Two AudioQuest Niagara 5000’s with AudioQuest Dragon and Hurricane Power Cords

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Chicago suburbs
    Posts
    1,583

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpinist View Post
    Thanks Bill,

    I read those threads and there seems to be an issue with tube components being plugged into the 7000’s low current outlets (humming), which go through its transformer. However, the high current outlets on the 7000 don’t go through the transformer. Since my amplifiers are my only components with tubes and are plugged into the high current outlets, in theory, the 7000 should provide more noise reduction to my Select II DAC than the 5000 and still not hum.

    Ken
    I agree with your logic, but particularly when it comes to power conditioners I would strongly recommend an audition in your system before committing to a purchase.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Seattle Washington USA
    Posts
    1,170

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Why are you using one on amps?
    First Sound Mark3SI preamp. Audion Black Shadow 845 SET Monoblocks. Mojo Audio Deja Vu Server. Mojo Audio Mystic 3 DAC. Linear Solution Ethernet Switch. Gigafoil with LPS. STST Motus II TT with Vertere SG1 arm, Hana ML Cartridge, Allnic H1201 phono pre. Pure Audio Project Trio 15 Horn speakers with Mundord Supreme oil caps. Power via 10 awg Oyaide cable from panel to custom distribution strip feeding front end. Oyaide dedicated10 AWG branch circuits from panel to each amp. Inakustik speaker and interconnect cables, Genesis Interconnect.
    Kingrexelectric.com Lyncole certified grounding specialist.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,381

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrex View Post
    Why are you using one on amps?
    Because it is specifically designed to be used with my amps through its high current outlets. It is non-current limiting as it can provide over 90 amps of peak instantaneous current.

    Ken
    "No summit worth climbing is easily attained."
    --------------------------------------------
    Source: MSB Select II DAC with Two Mono Powerbases and Femto 33 Clock; Renderer V2 Digital Input Module and Roon Nucleus Plus; MSB UMT V Signature Transport
    Amps: Vandersteen M7-HPA Mono Amps; MSB M204 Mono Amps
    Speakers: Vandersteen Model 7 Mk2
    Power: Two AudioQuest Niagara 5000’s with AudioQuest Dragon and Hurricane Power Cords

  7. #7

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpinist View Post
    Thanks Bill,

    I read those threads and there seems to be an issue with tube components being plugged into the 7000’s low current outlets (humming), which go through its transformer. However, the high current outlets on the 7000 don’t go through the transformer. Since my amplifiers are my only components with tubes and are plugged into the high current outlets, in theory, the 7000 should provide more noise reduction to my Select II DAC than the 5000 and still not hum.

    Ken
    Any power product that adds hum to your system should be a non-starter. The power supplies in your gear were designed to clean the incoming AC from your wall outlets.
    Micro Seiki SX-8000 air bearing table, SME 312s arm, SME 3012R arn, Dynavector XV-1s cartridge, Lyra Etna SL cartridge, ARC Ref 3 phono stage, Otari MX-55 2 track R2R, Ampex 350 tape repros, Roon Nucleus Plus music server, HiFi Rose 150B DAC, ARC Ref 6, ARC Ref 75 with KT-150s, Parasound JC5 amp , JBL 4345 speakers, Viero Equilibro Level 3 speaker cables, and Definitive Technology Ref subs.

    Reviewer for Positive Feedback

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Seattle Washington USA
    Posts
    1,170

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by mep View Post
    Any power product that adds hum to your system should be a non-starter. The power supplies in your gear were designed to clean the incoming AC from your wall outlets.
    God I wish that were true. If it were the case, power conditioners would not be needed.
    First Sound Mark3SI preamp. Audion Black Shadow 845 SET Monoblocks. Mojo Audio Deja Vu Server. Mojo Audio Mystic 3 DAC. Linear Solution Ethernet Switch. Gigafoil with LPS. STST Motus II TT with Vertere SG1 arm, Hana ML Cartridge, Allnic H1201 phono pre. Pure Audio Project Trio 15 Horn speakers with Mundord Supreme oil caps. Power via 10 awg Oyaide cable from panel to custom distribution strip feeding front end. Oyaide dedicated10 AWG branch circuits from panel to each amp. Inakustik speaker and interconnect cables, Genesis Interconnect.
    Kingrexelectric.com Lyncole certified grounding specialist.

  9. #9

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrex View Post
    God I wish that were true. If it were the case, power conditioners would not be needed.
    You are an outlier. From what you have stated numerous times, you have all kinds of weird electrical phenomena at your house that even power cleaning products can't get rid of. You said your system always hums. You obviously have some unique issues.
    Micro Seiki SX-8000 air bearing table, SME 312s arm, SME 3012R arn, Dynavector XV-1s cartridge, Lyra Etna SL cartridge, ARC Ref 3 phono stage, Otari MX-55 2 track R2R, Ampex 350 tape repros, Roon Nucleus Plus music server, HiFi Rose 150B DAC, ARC Ref 6, ARC Ref 75 with KT-150s, Parasound JC5 amp , JBL 4345 speakers, Viero Equilibro Level 3 speaker cables, and Definitive Technology Ref subs.

    Reviewer for Positive Feedback

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Seattle Washington USA
    Posts
    1,170

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by mep View Post
    You are an outlier. From what you have stated numerous times, you have all kinds of weird electrical phenomena at your house that even power cleaning products can't get rid of. You said your system always hums. You obviously have some unique issues.
    Power conditions get rid of humming at my house. Some equipment such as my Rega Osiris benefitted and sounded better with the Isoteck Syncro. A balanced power transformer benefited my Conrad Johnson Premier 140. Neither of those products benefited my front end as they added a lot of Vail or just altered the sound in ways I did not like. My current amps have not responded well to any power conditioners I've tried. But that wasn't the point of my comment. My point was I don't think manufacturers design power conditioning into their gear. If they did design power conditioning into their gear, no one would be purchasing anything from PS audio, Isoteck, Audioquest, Furman ETC.

    Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they all have built in power conditioning. Consumers of external products maybe like to change the sound the manufacturer thought was best.
    First Sound Mark3SI preamp. Audion Black Shadow 845 SET Monoblocks. Mojo Audio Deja Vu Server. Mojo Audio Mystic 3 DAC. Linear Solution Ethernet Switch. Gigafoil with LPS. STST Motus II TT with Vertere SG1 arm, Hana ML Cartridge, Allnic H1201 phono pre. Pure Audio Project Trio 15 Horn speakers with Mundord Supreme oil caps. Power via 10 awg Oyaide cable from panel to custom distribution strip feeding front end. Oyaide dedicated10 AWG branch circuits from panel to each amp. Inakustik speaker and interconnect cables, Genesis Interconnect.
    Kingrexelectric.com Lyncole certified grounding specialist.

  11. #11

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrex View Post
    Power conditions get rid of humming at my house. Some equipment such as my Rega Osiris benefitted and sounded better with the Isoteck Syncro. A balanced power transformer benefited my Conrad Johnson Premier 140. Neither of those products benefited my front end as they added a lot of Vail or just altered the sound in ways I did not like. My current amps have not responded well to any power conditioners I've tried. But that wasn't the point of my comment. My point was I don't think manufacturers design power conditioning into their gear. If they did design power conditioning into their gear, no one would be purchasing anything from PS audio, Isoteck, Audioquest, Furman ETC.

    Maybe I'm wrong. Maybe they all have built in power conditioning. Consumers of external products maybe like to change the sound the manufacturer thought was best.

    Your amps still hum right? That's what you wrote yesterday in your first listening impressions of your new speakers. And yes, manufacturers of high end gear build robust power supplies that are well regulated and that do an excellent job of filtering out noise and hum from the AC input. Many amp manufactures are emphatic that they want their amps plugged straight into the wall. I'm sure you can find gear that has crappy power supplies and wasn't designed by an electrical engineer, but it's best to buy gear that was designed well in the first place and not have to use outboard bandaids IMO.
    Micro Seiki SX-8000 air bearing table, SME 312s arm, SME 3012R arn, Dynavector XV-1s cartridge, Lyra Etna SL cartridge, ARC Ref 3 phono stage, Otari MX-55 2 track R2R, Ampex 350 tape repros, Roon Nucleus Plus music server, HiFi Rose 150B DAC, ARC Ref 6, ARC Ref 75 with KT-150s, Parasound JC5 amp , JBL 4345 speakers, Viero Equilibro Level 3 speaker cables, and Definitive Technology Ref subs.

    Reviewer for Positive Feedback

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Seattle Washington USA
    Posts
    1,170

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by mep View Post
    Your amps still hum right? That's what you wrote yesterday in your first listening impressions of your new speakers. And yes, manufacturers of high end gear build robust power supplies that are well regulated and that do an excellent job of filtering out noise and hum from the AC input. Many amp manufactures are emphatic that they want their amps plugged straight into the wall. I'm sure you can find gear that has crappy power supplies and wasn't designed by an electrical engineer, but it's best to buy gear that was designed well in the first place and not have to use outboard bandaids IMO.
    I have no idea what amp manufacturers due today. But I 100% agree with your belief in how to power amps.

    What about front end gear. Do you believe they also utilize devices to mitigate noise pollution. If so do you also believe all front end gear should be plugged directly into a wall?
    First Sound Mark3SI preamp. Audion Black Shadow 845 SET Monoblocks. Mojo Audio Deja Vu Server. Mojo Audio Mystic 3 DAC. Linear Solution Ethernet Switch. Gigafoil with LPS. STST Motus II TT with Vertere SG1 arm, Hana ML Cartridge, Allnic H1201 phono pre. Pure Audio Project Trio 15 Horn speakers with Mundord Supreme oil caps. Power via 10 awg Oyaide cable from panel to custom distribution strip feeding front end. Oyaide dedicated10 AWG branch circuits from panel to each amp. Inakustik speaker and interconnect cables, Genesis Interconnect.
    Kingrexelectric.com Lyncole certified grounding specialist.

  13. #13

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrex View Post
    I have no idea what amp manufacturers due today. But I 100% agree with your belief in how to power amps.

    What about front end gear. Do you believe they also utilize devices to mitigate noise pollution. If so do you also believe all front end gear should be plugged directly into a wall?
    I don’t use any external power filtering devices in my system. My preference is to plug all gear straight into the wall if possible.
    Micro Seiki SX-8000 air bearing table, SME 312s arm, SME 3012R arn, Dynavector XV-1s cartridge, Lyra Etna SL cartridge, ARC Ref 3 phono stage, Otari MX-55 2 track R2R, Ampex 350 tape repros, Roon Nucleus Plus music server, HiFi Rose 150B DAC, ARC Ref 6, ARC Ref 75 with KT-150s, Parasound JC5 amp , JBL 4345 speakers, Viero Equilibro Level 3 speaker cables, and Definitive Technology Ref subs.

    Reviewer for Positive Feedback

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    3,766

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrex View Post
    I have no idea what amp manufacturers due today. But I 100% agree with your belief in how to power amps.

    What about front end gear. Do you believe they also utilize devices to mitigate noise pollution. If so do you also believe all front end gear should be plugged directly into a wall?
    I prefer my amps plugged into the Denali 6000T. I plan on trying Transparent Opus Power Cords in the near future and will see if I prefer them into the 6000T or directly into the wall.
    Jim

    D'Agostino Momentum M-400's MxV’s & HD Pre-amp
    Wilson Alexandria X2 Series 2 speakers
    Digital: dCS Vivaldi APEX DAC, Clock & Upsampler
    Analog: SME 20/3 with Esoteric E-03 Phono
    Transparent Opus Speaker Cable & Interconnects & Opus Power Cords
    Power Cords on Digital: Shunyata
    Power Conditioner - Shunyata Everest

  15. #15

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    FYI I believe there was a recent update/change to the 7000......not sure of details

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,381

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingsrule View Post
    FYI I believe there was a recent update/change to the 7000......not sure of details
    Please post any details you have.

    Thanks,
    Ken
    "No summit worth climbing is easily attained."
    --------------------------------------------
    Source: MSB Select II DAC with Two Mono Powerbases and Femto 33 Clock; Renderer V2 Digital Input Module and Roon Nucleus Plus; MSB UMT V Signature Transport
    Amps: Vandersteen M7-HPA Mono Amps; MSB M204 Mono Amps
    Speakers: Vandersteen Model 7 Mk2
    Power: Two AudioQuest Niagara 5000’s with AudioQuest Dragon and Hurricane Power Cords

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Seattle Washington USA
    Posts
    1,170

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by still-one View Post
    I prefer my amps plugged into the Denali 6000T. I plan on trying Transparent Opus Power Cords in the near future and will see if I prefer them into the 6000T or directly into the wall.
    So you have tube or SS. Did you have noise issues that drove the purchase. Thanks
    First Sound Mark3SI preamp. Audion Black Shadow 845 SET Monoblocks. Mojo Audio Deja Vu Server. Mojo Audio Mystic 3 DAC. Linear Solution Ethernet Switch. Gigafoil with LPS. STST Motus II TT with Vertere SG1 arm, Hana ML Cartridge, Allnic H1201 phono pre. Pure Audio Project Trio 15 Horn speakers with Mundord Supreme oil caps. Power via 10 awg Oyaide cable from panel to custom distribution strip feeding front end. Oyaide dedicated10 AWG branch circuits from panel to each amp. Inakustik speaker and interconnect cables, Genesis Interconnect.
    Kingrexelectric.com Lyncole certified grounding specialist.

  18. #18

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrex View Post
    So you have tube or SS. Did you have noise issues that drove the purchase. Thanks
    He lists his gear under his name.
    Micro Seiki SX-8000 air bearing table, SME 312s arm, SME 3012R arn, Dynavector XV-1s cartridge, Lyra Etna SL cartridge, ARC Ref 3 phono stage, Otari MX-55 2 track R2R, Ampex 350 tape repros, Roon Nucleus Plus music server, HiFi Rose 150B DAC, ARC Ref 6, ARC Ref 75 with KT-150s, Parasound JC5 amp , JBL 4345 speakers, Viero Equilibro Level 3 speaker cables, and Definitive Technology Ref subs.

    Reviewer for Positive Feedback

  19. #19

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Did anyone try AQ Niagara products with Vitus Audio amplification?
    Triangle Magellan Concerto 2 < AQ Everest < Vitus Audio SS-010 Mk2 < AQ Dragon HC < AQ WEL Signature XLR < Chord Qutest w UpTone JS-2 & AQ Dragon Source < SOtM tX-USBultra w 75Ohm Master Clock Input, Paul Hynes SR5-12 Turbo XL & AQ Dragon Source < AQ Diamond USB < Aurender N-100H w AQ Dragon Source < Gryphon PowerZone w AQ NRG-Wild < Solid Tech Hybrid < Ansuz Darkz D-TC, Darkz D2, Stillpoints Ultra SS, Omicron Harmonic Stabilizer & Gold SE < Furutech FT-SWS < Synergistic Research Blue Quantum Fuse

  20. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,381

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    I made some major changes since my last post. I traded in my Niagara 7000 for two Niagara 5000’s. The Niagara 5000’s agree much better with my quirky power situation (big swings in voltage and EMI).

    Each of my MSB Select 2 power supplies gets its own low current duplex in my first Niagara 5000, which is plugged into my first dedicated 20 amp line. I find the treble and midrange has more ease than the less noise reduction high current outlets, yet retains outstanding dynamics.

    My entire network (modem, router, NAS and Roon Nucleus Plus), each device gets its own low current duplex on my second Niagara 5000, which is on my second dedicated 20 amp line. Lastly, each monoblock amplifier and subwoofer monoblock amplifier gets its own high current duplex. Much trial and error to come up with this configuration. I am very pleased with the results.

    Ken
    "No summit worth climbing is easily attained."
    --------------------------------------------
    Source: MSB Select II DAC with Two Mono Powerbases and Femto 33 Clock; Renderer V2 Digital Input Module and Roon Nucleus Plus; MSB UMT V Signature Transport
    Amps: Vandersteen M7-HPA Mono Amps; MSB M204 Mono Amps
    Speakers: Vandersteen Model 7 Mk2
    Power: Two AudioQuest Niagara 5000’s with AudioQuest Dragon and Hurricane Power Cords

  21. #21
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    SE Michigan
    Posts
    3,766

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Alpinist View Post
    I made some major changes since my last post. I traded in my Niagara 7000 for two Niagara 5000’s. The Niagara 5000’s agree much better with my quirky power situation (big swings in voltage and EMI).

    Each of my MSB Select 2 power supplies gets its own low current duplex in my first Niagara 5000, which is plugged into my first dedicated 20 amp line. I find the treble and midrange has more ease than the less noise reduction high current outlets, yet retains outstanding dynamics.

    My entire network (modem, router, NAS and Roon Nucleus Plus), each device gets its own low current duplex on my second Niagara 5000, which is on my second dedicated 20 amp line. Lastly, each monoblock amplifier and subwoofer monoblock amplifier gets its own high current duplex. Much trial and error to come up with this configuration. I am very pleased with the results.

    Ken
    Thanks for the update. If I didn't have all my front end gear plugged into my Denali I would probably give the Niagara unit a go.

    I see my last post on this topic was over 15 months ago. As I noted then I was waiting to try Transparent Opus Power Cords on my amps. I liked them more than the Shunyata's I was using connected to the Denali. I now run my Momentum's with the Opus connected direct to the wall. All my other gear goes into the Denali 6000T using Shunyata on my digital gear and Transparent on my analog.
    Jim

    D'Agostino Momentum M-400's MxV’s & HD Pre-amp
    Wilson Alexandria X2 Series 2 speakers
    Digital: dCS Vivaldi APEX DAC, Clock & Upsampler
    Analog: SME 20/3 with Esoteric E-03 Phono
    Transparent Opus Speaker Cable & Interconnects & Opus Power Cords
    Power Cords on Digital: Shunyata
    Power Conditioner - Shunyata Everest

  22. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Seattle Washington USA
    Posts
    1,170

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    How much hum were you guys actually getting. I sit in the middle with my friends. 2 have dead quiet systems. One uses no power conditioning. I wired his system. Another uses equitech. Another has all sorts of noise and uses all sorts ot gear and still has noise. Another is strait in the wall and has fluctuating noise. I helped on some of the wiring on the last. Mine has minor constant noise that comes and goes. Never very loud but always there. I want mine dead quiet but the 3 of us with noise have tried so many devices out there but hear them all.

    FWIW, better grounding, isolation of branch circuit wiring in the panel and running to the rack as well as separation of all wires behind the rack got rid of 70% of the noise, i'm still styck with 30% I can't clear. I am actually starting to think I have radio interference. I wonder if a shield around the equipment would stop the noise. My CJ amp was more quiet with the tube shield onm but it compressed the power and shunted the highs. Or so I thought I heard. Maybe it doesn't even hum and its all in my head.
    Hahaaaaa

  23. #23
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2014
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    3,381

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Quote Originally Posted by Kingrex View Post
    How much hum were you guys actually getting. I sit in the middle with my friends. 2 have dead quiet systems. One uses no power conditioning. I wired his system. Another uses equitech. Another has all sorts of noise and uses all sorts ot gear and still has noise. Another is strait in the wall and has fluctuating noise. I helped on some of the wiring on the last. Mine has minor constant noise that comes and goes. Never very loud but always there. I want mine dead quiet but the 3 of us with noise have tried so many devices out there but hear them all.

    FWIW, better grounding, isolation of branch circuit wiring in the panel and running to the rack as well as separation of all wires behind the rack got rid of 70% of the noise, i'm still styck with 30% I can't clear. I am actually starting to think I have radio interference. I wonder if a shield around the equipment would stop the noise. My CJ amp was more quiet with the tube shield onm but it compressed the power and shunted the highs. Or so I thought I heard. Maybe it doesn't even hum and its all in my head.
    Hahaaaaa
    I had an audible buzz with the Niagara 7000. The Niagara 5000’s are dead quiet.

    Ken
    "No summit worth climbing is easily attained."
    --------------------------------------------
    Source: MSB Select II DAC with Two Mono Powerbases and Femto 33 Clock; Renderer V2 Digital Input Module and Roon Nucleus Plus; MSB UMT V Signature Transport
    Amps: Vandersteen M7-HPA Mono Amps; MSB M204 Mono Amps
    Speakers: Vandersteen Model 7 Mk2
    Power: Two AudioQuest Niagara 5000’s with AudioQuest Dragon and Hurricane Power Cords

  24. #24
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2017
    Location
    Sarasota, FL
    Posts
    36

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Kingrex, all of my previous c j amps, at least a dozen over the years, could hum a bit. Especially the monoblocks. They suggested lifting the grounds. That always worked. They also recommend going direct to the wall with the power amp.
    Best,
    Wilson Yvette speakers, [B]Conrad-Johnson [ART88 [B]pre, TEA1bc phono, and ART 27A Amplifier, Marantz digital player, Wireworld Gold and Platinum ICs, USB and power cables, Rega Planar 10 turntable/ Apheta cartridge, Wireworld Platimum Eclipse 8 speaker cables, AQ Hurricane and Tornado power cables, Shunyata Denali 6000S/V2, Sigma NR PC and DELTA USB cords, Symposium and Stillpoint vibration control, JL Audio Fathom 113 subwoofer, dCS Bartok Streamer/DAC

  25. #25
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2020
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    35

    Re: AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

    Did any also have a chance to listen/compare the new 3000 to the 5000?

AudioShark - The Best High End Audio Discussion forum.

AudioShark forum is a leading forum site for High End Audio Discussion, Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater System Discussion, Best Home Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater Installation Discussion etc.

The AudioShark forum was created for sharing the passion of high-end Audio. We have Audiophiles from all over the world participating and sharing their knowledge. From novice to experts, you will find a friendly environment for discussing about High End Audio, Stereo System, Home Theater System, Home Stereo System, Home Theater Installation, Amplifiers, Speakers, Subwoofers, Integrated System, Acoustic treatments & Digital Room Corrections and many more.

At AudioShark, we also have incorporated an exciting Marketplace where members can peruse terrific buys on used gear, as well as meet dealers and discuss the purchase of new gear.

We are as crazy about this hobby as you are! So come on in and join us! Audioshark.org the Friendliest Audio Forum!

Industry Participation Disclosure : The owner and administrator of Audioshark is the owner of Suncoast Audio LLC in Sarasota Florida. Suncoast Audio has a full brick and mortar presence in Sarasota with several great show rooms with many world class brands. More information can be found at http://www.suncoastaudio.com

Audioshark is a community of like minded individuals. Audioshark welcomes participation from all manufacturers and owners of all brands and products. It is our belief that online forums provide a community of like minded audiophiles and music lovers to encourage the growth of this wonderful hobby.

Sincerely,
The Audioshark.org Team

AudioQuest Niagara 7000 vs. 5000

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •