Thread: Hypex Nilai 500

Any info on your build , PSU size, type etc, what kind of load do you have them driving .? Did you try increasing Sinks ..?


Regards

Who would sit through two hours of that?

Originally Posted by Jack

Who would sit through two hours of that?

Agreed.

IMO, GaN is the Class D that sounds best.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Pro

where are you purchasing the Nilai modules from ? i dont see them listed .....



Regards

Originally Posted by a.wayne

where are you purchasing the Nilai modules from ? i dont see them listed .....



Regards

You can get a whole stereo kit here and a mono kit same page Hypex Nilai500DIY 250W Stereo Amplifier Kit

Ok , thanks , registered an account with them today ...!


Regards

Originally Posted by a.wayne

Ok , thanks , registered an account with them today ...!
Regards

The 21st century awaits you Mr Wayne

The 21st century is the one not yet ready fir me

Originally Posted by a.wayne

The 21st century is the one not yet ready fir me

Looks like MEPs SINAD worship breddas approve Hypex Nilai500DIY Amplifier Review | Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum
Definitely has some juice as it doesn't buckle into 2 ohms. That's some serious squeaky clean drive power vs load. Thought you were a HE/horns guy?
Twill be dead silent with 100+ db sensitivity systems, but 500+ watts?? Bit of overkill IMO. Of course, for non HE, just the ticket.
See yuh soon.

cheers

Originally Posted by Alkyogre

Yesterday audioscience review retested the Nilai. Originally he had a bit of noise pickup at 10 kHz, but he tested it with the top lid open.
After testing with the lid closed that noise was gone. Why does ASR measure an amp and post results while it was still open?

That having said, with this retest it is one of the best amps ever measured

Hypex Nilai500DIY Amplifier Review | Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum

Where is the "review"? I only see lots of measurements.

Originally Posted by Alkyogre

Scroll down. Although I have to agree that he is saying not much in his conclusion

Conclusions
It is clear Hypex is taking competition in class D amplifiers seriously responding with a DIY friend amplifier solution that has a ton of power and wonderful performance. While we could nitpick here and there, but in the larger context of the amplifiers out there, this is a superb offering of great performance and lots and lots of power.

FYI I don't have pricing for the kit. If someone has it, please post. I see online ads saying around $900 to $1,100 for a single channel.

I am happy to add Hypex Nilai500DIY amplifier and its companion PS500DIY power supply to my recommended list.

That's not a review, it's a closing statement after his testing results.

Originally Posted by mep

Where is the "review"? I only see lots of measurements.

Some review with only t words, some with only measurements ...........

Originally Posted by AJ Soundfield

Looks like MEPs SINAD worship breddas approve Hypex Nilai500DIY Amplifier Review | Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum
Definitely has some juice as it doesn't buckle into 2 ohms. That's some serious squeaky clean drive power vs load. Thought you were a HE/horns guy?
Twill be dead silent with 100+ db sensitivity systems, but 500+ watts?? Bit of overkill IMO. Of course, for non HE, just the ticket.
See yuh soon.

cheers

No horns here , that was MEP , he got tired of clipping his AR on his NOLA's and switched to , a Quasi horn setup........

anyway, the HYpex current limits heavily into 2 ohms , but has enuff there to make do , problem is heat soaking driving low Z and PSu sagging, big sinks or a fan like crown does on their class D will help here. problem with ASR is no sine waves to clipping pics , would love to see the symmetry and of course they are allergic to square waves. Amir tests are skewed to make class D look superior and in some respects the measurements are excellent , but its not the whole picture ..


tempted to give one a go , low heat , low draw when just doing casual listening would work for me no need to run the behemoth for casual listening time ...

regards

Originally Posted by a.wayne

No horns here

Yeah I guess we'll never know.

Originally Posted by a.wayne

anyway, the HYpex current limits heavily into 2 ohms , but has enuff there to make do

Cool, nonsense and sense in one sentence. 500+ into 2 ohms for a 250/500 8/4ohm is plenty and good performance, especially for the ridiculously low price. A great many "audiophile$$" amps can't drive 2 ohms and unless the speaker has idiot "injurneering", that much power>load would be more than suffice. Hopefully I didn't insult your mystery speakers.

Originally Posted by a.wayne

Amir tests are skewed to make class D look superior and in some respects the measurements are excellent , but its not the whole picture ..

Actually it is the whole picture. His and JA etc who do test, show that the Hypex, Purifi et al are superb, transparent amplification, capable of outperforming human hearing, including yours, in the really, real, non-imaginary world. But that doesn't mean the sight and "knowledge" of them can't/won't lead to audiophile melodrama. So YMMV.

Originally Posted by a.wayne

tempted to give one a go , low heat , low draw when just doing casual listening would work for me no need to run the behemoth for casual listening time ...

Well, unless the secret speakers are low sensitivity and/or audiophile injurneering impedance, they will be every bit as transparent as other well designed SS, at any sane level. As I will continue to demo, In public.
Si yuh soon.

cheers,

AJ

Originally Posted by AJ Soundfield

Yeah I guess we'll never know.


Cool, nonsense and sense in one sentence. 500+ into 2 ohms for a 250/500 8/4ohm is plenty and good performance, especially for the ridiculously low price. A great many "audiophile$$" amps can't drive 2 ohms and unless the speaker has idiot "injurneering", that much power>load would be more than suffice. Hopefully I didn't insult your mystery speakers.


Actually it is the whole picture. His and JA etc who do test, show that the Hypex, Purifi et al are superb, transparent amplification, capable of outperforming human hearing, including yours, in the really, real, non-imaginary world. But that doesn't mean the sight and "knowledge" of them can't/won't lead to audiophile melodrama. So YMMV.


Well, unless the secret speakers are low sensitivity and/or audiophile injurneering impedance, they will be every bit as transparent as other well designed SS, at any sane level. As I will continue to demo, In public.
Si yuh soon.

cheers,

AJ

Explain to me at what level is your understanding AJ, apparently i keep speaking over your head

200 into 8 is 800 into 2 if no current limiting , so 500+ into two is serious currently limiting , this is basic even for a Campion nutter , this level of limiting ( and heat soak) will rear its ugly head , on anything but a 8 ohm speaker well for those who interest is actually accurate timbre, drive and ultimate sound ...

So on a 8 ohm load i can expect decent sound , with the accompanying low Z of 4 ohm, not on a 4 ohm which could see 2 ohm , you should try and learn what phase angles due to amps with falling PSU and current limiting ...

BTW Audiophile injurneering is usually accompanied with digital eq, xovers , blah blah blah , mega compensation , producing poor timbre/timing, splish splashy sound at best , the deaf and blind can partake , something for
everyone ..

To each their own, heavy Class D lifting in public is fully supported , as is Class A, AB, SET, SS or toobs, so carry on ..!


How is that for nonsense and sense .......?


Regards .....

Originally Posted by a.wayne

Explain to me at what level is your understanding AJ, apparently i keep speaking over your head

Yes, my formal EE education, microwave/radar/satcom/30+ years of varying engineering work, actual products and public demos, puts me at a serious disadvantage to an audio forum expert like yourself Mr Wayne.

Originally Posted by a.wayne

200 into 8 is 800 into 2 if no current limiting , so 500+ into two is serious currently limiting

Without serious cherry picking show me the list of real world 200w/8ohm amps putting out 800 into 2 ohms...and I'll show you a list 1000x bigger that can't. If 500+ into 2 can't drive your mystery speakers, that's purely on you. More than plenty current for the 99.99% of non-pathological engineered speakers. Since you're understandably way too embarrassed to reveal anything about your system, you can't even claim "well my amp can" ;-).

Originally Posted by a.wayne

BTW Audiophile injurneering is usually accompanied with digital eq, xovers , blah blah blah , mega compensation , producing poor timbre/timing, splish splashy sound at best , the deaf and blind can partake , something for everyone ..

Like your system you're projecting. Well. we'll have to take your word since no one else will ever hear it .
Unlike my countless demo's of electro-acoustics and perceptual knowledge. No hiding. See yuh in Room 1215

Fail to see where your experience has anything to do with audio , EE’s are dime a dozen even i have one , my Audio experience supersedes yours by decades with actual achievements , sales customers and patents not simple high school designs then walk around like a Big wig doing demo’s ..!

So yes you lack understandings in relations to most things audio , never questioned ur education , microwave knowledge or experience , makes sense now that top end could fry eggs ..!


Small hint learn up and show some respect goes along way in receiving some ..!

Yes we can arm wrestle in your room ..

Originally Posted by a.wayne

my Audio experience supersedes yours by decades with actual achievements , sales customers and patents not simple high school designs then walk around like a Big wig doing demo’s ..!

I'll admit that your white van speaker business has been around a lot longer than I've been a company.
Too bad everything about you is always a secret, but that's understandable when its all purely imaginary+blah
Van packed, heading to show my knowledge...in the non-fantasy really real world

Originally Posted by atmasphere

FWIW, the amp is going to behave as a voltage source to within a couple dB of full power. So at normal listening levels the 2 Ohm thing really isn't a concern. Usually when you run into those 2Ohm impedances with weird phase angles its at a certain frequency and not the entire impedance curve so in practice this will be an issue for only a very few.

FWIW, when the amp is asked to drive a harder load its going to make more distortion too. I don't see the point myself- I've always had the impression that high end audio was about getting away from distortion and closer to the music. There are plenty of easier to drive speakers that sound just as good or better than those that are not easy to drive (and some of that comes simply from the amp making less distortion).

IMO/IME if high end audio reproduction is your goal, your amplifier dollar investment will be best served by a speaker of higher impedance and higher efficiency. If sound pressure is your goal, you have a (IMO) weak 3dB argument for lower impedances, along with which speaker cables become far more critical.

With all due respect Ralph, such nonsense , pushing lowest distortion mantra while designing high distortion toob amps, is just more cognitive dissonance than engineering, when does the distortion matter ? I have yet to hear your versions of high Z and efficiency best low Z , low sensitivity setups, (ribbons, ESL's, etc ) most of us are driven by results not meme's and well wishes...




Cmon man at least be genuine with your responses .....




Regards

Originally Posted by AJ Soundfield

I'll admit that your white van speaker business has been around a lot longer than I've been a company.
Too bad everything about you is always a secret, but that's understandable when its all purely imaginary+blah
Van packed, heading to show my knowledge...in the non-fantasy really real world

Originally Posted by a.wayne

pushing lowest distortion mantra while designing high distortion toob amps, is just more cognitive dissonance than engineering, when does the distortion matter ? I have yet to hear your versions of high Z and efficiency best low Z , low sensitivity setups, (ribbons, ESL's, etc ) most of us are driven by results not meme's

Gary-Coleman-wtf.gif