Welcome to the AudioShark Forums.
Results 1 to 16 of 16
  1. #1

    Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    Hello guys, if anyone can help me, i would really appreciated it. Here is the situation: i currently have the Focal Kanta Nº2 and recently bought the Burson timekeeper 3X GT monoblocks. They are really impressive monoblocks for the money and have quite a powerful and impactful sound and are able to easily drive the Kanta's even in the low gain pure class A mode, however, as they have quite a forward punchy sound, sometimes, the treble can be quite harsh and ear piercing.
    I am now using them with the TEAC UD-701N which is a dac/streamer and also functions as a preamp, but it mostly excels as a dac/streamer.

    Given this, i am torn between a couple of options (Keep in mind i am located in Europe, so purchase is going to have to be from a EU country).

    - Keep the timekeeper 3X GT, which i generally really like, but get a preamp (for example a tube preamp to sweeten the treble), if that's the case, if someone can point some suggestions that would be great.

    - Sell them and buy a luxman integrated amp. I have recently tried the Luxman L-507Z and really really liked it, they pair really well with the Kanta's and the treble is great, however as it's relatively new model and Luxman prices have exponentially increased in Europe, it is really hard for me to justify spending that much money on a 507 series.
    However, i have a good possibility of buying a slightly used L595A-SE for cheaper than the 507Z, but i have never tried this model and i'm not able to test it first if i was to buy it. Was anyone able to test both models that are able to tell me the differences between them? When i tried the 507Z i also tried the 509X and found the 507Z to be quite more dynamic, possibily because of the new LIFES implementation, so i'm afraid that i might not like the 595A as much, since it does not have LIFES. However i have heard really good things about this model.

    I also accept other suggestions. I'm looking for a really dynamic and detailed amplifier, but that at the same time can provide the "warmth" that these Kanta's require to really be enjoyable.

    Thank you in advance

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2022
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,266

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    Quote Originally Posted by FadiNg View Post
    Hello guys, if anyone can help me, i would really appreciated it. Here is the situation: i currently have the Focal Kanta Nº2 and recently bought the Burson timekeeper 3X GT monoblocks. They are really impressive monoblocks for the money and have quite a powerful and impactful sound and are able to easily drive the Kanta's even in the low gain pure class A mode, however, as they have quite a forward punchy sound, sometimes, the treble can be quite harsh and ear piercing.
    I am now using them with the TEAC UD-701N which is a dac/streamer and also functions as a preamp, but it mostly excels as a dac/streamer.

    Given this, i am torn between a couple of options (Keep in mind i am located in Europe, so purchase is going to have to be from a EU country).

    - Keep the timekeeper 3X GT, which i generally really like, but get a preamp (for example a tube preamp to sweeten the treble), if that's the case, if someone can point some suggestions that would be great.

    - Sell them and buy a luxman integrated amp. I have recently tried the Luxman L-507Z and really really liked it, they pair really well with the Kanta's and the treble is great, however as it's relatively new model and Luxman prices have exponentially increased in Europe, it is really hard for me to justify spending that much money on a 507 series.
    However, i have a good possibility of buying a slightly used L595A-SE for cheaper than the 507Z, but i have never tried this model and i'm not able to test it first if i was to buy it. Was anyone able to test both models that are able to tell me the differences between them? When i tried the 507Z i also tried the 509X and found the 507Z to be quite more dynamic, possibily because of the new LIFES implementation, so i'm afraid that i might not like the 595A as much, since it does not have LIFES. However i have heard really good things about this model.

    I also accept other suggestions. I'm looking for a really dynamic and detailed amplifier, but that at the same time can provide the "warmth" that these Kanta's require to really be enjoyable.

    Thank you in advance
    Hello - I owned both the 595 SE and a 509.

    They are VERY different sounding and very dependent on your taste and speakers.

    Although I prefer the 509 in my system over the 595, with Focal's the 595 should be a great match.

    But you really should listen for yourself.
    "We are all billionaires because of the huge piles sweet dough rolling in from our participation in the ongoing campaign to suck your collective brains through a stirrer-straw." - PTA Editorial Staff

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Tallahassee, Florida/Greenville, SC
    Posts
    3,242

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    If you have access to try you might want to look into Audia Flight from Italy. They should be more competitive priced for you than Luxman. Also Norma, Trilogy and Circle Audio, all EU brands also.
    Main - JVC QL-Y7/Denon DL-301 Mk II, Gold Note PH-10, Jays CDT3 Mk3 , Auralic Aries G2.2, Holo May KTE, Supratek Cabernet, Kinki Studio EX-B7 monoblocks, Verity Audio Otello, (2) Rythmik F12SE, Audio Envy IC, SC & PC's, Triode Wire Lab PC's, Inakustik USB and I2S, (2) Puritan Audio Labs PSM-156 with Groundmaster City, Timbernation rack

    Family Room - Oppo UDP-203, Auralic Aries, Aqua La Voce S3, Kinki Studio EX-M1+, Nola KO, (2) Rythmik F-12G, Wireworld SC & IC's, Neotech PC's, SurgeX SA-1810

    Greenville, SC- Jays CDT2 Mk 3, Auralic Aries G1, Holo Spring 3 KTE, Supratek Chardonnay, Odyssey Audio Kismet Reference, Rosso Fiorentino Volterra 2, (2) RSL Speedwoofers, iFi Audio Power Station, Wireworld IC's, Inakustik USB and I2s, Triode Wire Lab SC, Triode Wire Lab PC's, Furutech NCF Clear Line, Timbernation rack.

  4. #4

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    My options at the moment and the best price i can get them (in euros)

    If i keep the burson's: Lab12 Pre 1 - 1.4K or Holo Serene - 3K

    If i sell the burson's:

    Luxman L-507Z - 8K (at this price for this model it's out of the question)
    Luxman L-595A SE - 6.75K
    Norma Revo IPA 140 - 4K
    Circle Labs A200 - 5K
    As for the Audio Flight, unfortunately i cannot really find any proper deal on the FLS 10.

    From the amplifiers listed, besides the 507Z which i have tried, i can only listen to the Norma Revo IPA 140, but unfortunately not with Focal speakers, or with speakers with similar sound signature.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    birmingham uk
    Posts
    586

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    heard a Luxman 507 recently with harbeth. Beautiful amps , if you cant afford the latest version just buy the outgoing version

    [ i have had a number of Focal speakers . used belles amps with them if i recall ]
    1]bel canto EIX/ F5 monoblocks . BC cd2, tannoy eaton legacy 2]bel canto pre 5 ,arcam a85 , black ice modded dac
    modded dac , marantz sa8005, Verity audio Rienzi

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Tallahassee, Florida/Greenville, SC
    Posts
    3,242

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    If you are trying to tone down the Focal tweeter then the hybrid Circle Labs may be the safest bet IMO.
    Main - JVC QL-Y7/Denon DL-301 Mk II, Gold Note PH-10, Jays CDT3 Mk3 , Auralic Aries G2.2, Holo May KTE, Supratek Cabernet, Kinki Studio EX-B7 monoblocks, Verity Audio Otello, (2) Rythmik F12SE, Audio Envy IC, SC & PC's, Triode Wire Lab PC's, Inakustik USB and I2S, (2) Puritan Audio Labs PSM-156 with Groundmaster City, Timbernation rack

    Family Room - Oppo UDP-203, Auralic Aries, Aqua La Voce S3, Kinki Studio EX-M1+, Nola KO, (2) Rythmik F-12G, Wireworld SC & IC's, Neotech PC's, SurgeX SA-1810

    Greenville, SC- Jays CDT2 Mk 3, Auralic Aries G1, Holo Spring 3 KTE, Supratek Chardonnay, Odyssey Audio Kismet Reference, Rosso Fiorentino Volterra 2, (2) RSL Speedwoofers, iFi Audio Power Station, Wireworld IC's, Inakustik USB and I2s, Triode Wire Lab SC, Triode Wire Lab PC's, Furutech NCF Clear Line, Timbernation rack.

  7. #7

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    So i was able to arrange an audition for the Norma Revo on my home, let's see how it goes. As for the Circle labs, since i have never heard any amplifier of the brand, it is a real shot in the dark, i believe that being the case i would probably risk the luxman L-595A, which i haven't specifically heard, but i have heard several other Luxman models and i always liked them. I will do a more in-depth research, to see if i am able to listen to the circle labs though.

    I will also try to test the burson's with a dedicated preamp, unfortunately in that case it can't either be with the lab12 pre1 nor the holo serene, as they aren't available in my area.

  8. #8

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    So, after hearing the norma, unfortunately, the exact same thing happens with the treble, even though the sound is not as forward and it has a better separation of instruments. The Norma is also a really neutral transparent amplifier, as is the timekeeper 3x gt, however, the burson's provides a much fuller and impactful sound, that feels wider and deeper, so i actually prefer the burson's to the Norma. (and i tried to do A/B testing with my wife changing the systems)
    Having said that, it's now clear to me that my room is also likely accentuating the treble problem, however, acoustic treatment isn't really an option for the room, so i just need to get a system that can attenuate this as much as possible, so clearly a amplifier on the "warmish" side but also while being really detailed.

    Considering this experience, i have even greater respect for the value for money that the burson's provide. So, the top priority now is to try and listen to a different preamp that can help with this. If that's not the case then i think i will have to surrender to the Luxman (if i can't find a way to listen to the circle labs). I will also add the Luxman M900U into consideration, if i can get my hands on decently priced used one.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    chicago burbs
    Posts
    623

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    When I tried the Kanta 3' one of the things I really liked was that upper midrange presentation, but it really does need to be carefully matched and they still need some grunt for bass below 80 hz. My favorite pairing with the kanta was a pathos logos mk2 int for the mids and treble, an integrated that pairs a single tube pre with a ss power amp.
    KEF Blade, Mc-611's, C49 rega jupiter, roon nucleus, revox tuner. Meridian dsp8000 se upgrade, meridian 218 zone controller VA Beethoven's, Hegel h360.

  10. #10

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    I heard a pathos kratos a while ago and i really liked it. Although i didn't listen to it with Focals. This would also be a possibility, but, unfortunately, i don't have any store close that has them for demo.

    I am also very curious to try another dac, as for what i need in my system a decent R2R dac is probably better suited than a delta sigma one, like the UD-701N that i use.

    Next week i will be able to test a holo spring 3 kte (unfortunately the may isn't available) in my system with a holo red for streamer. Let's see if that makes positive changes.

    I'm looking to hear as many devices as i can in these next few weeks. Hopefully 30 days from now i can have my "endgame" system

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    west Michigan
    Posts
    713

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    FadiNg,
    I give you an "A" for effort.
    However, have you ever considered that your speakers are the problem?
    There is a "camp" of audiophiles that find the Focal tweeter to be excessively "hot".
    Could you be chasing your tail?
    My System
    Acoustic Revive RTP-4
    Innuos Pulsar
    Lampizator BALTIC4
    Cary SLP-05
    Pass XA30.5 or
    Line Magnetic 845ia
    Reference 3A Reflector's
    Pr SVS SB3000 Subs
    Cables & Tubes "subject to change without notification".
    Complete system on battery power/solar
    Core Audio Design Rack
    DIY bass traps and custom curved diffusors.

  12. #12

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    Quote Originally Posted by jadedavid View Post
    FadiNg,
    I give you an "A" for effort.
    However, have you ever considered that your speakers are the problem?
    There is a "camp" of audiophiles that find the Focal tweeter to be excessively "hot".
    Could you be chasing your tail?
    Focals, and specifically Focals with a beryllium tweeter, are really picky and need to be carefully matched to sound their best, when they do, it can be majestic, at least for me, however, when they don't, then it can be a really harsh and fatiguing experience.

    Part of the problem in this case definitely lies on the space where i have them now. So that part is harder to resolve, the other part is because of system matching, and that's what i'm trying to solve. I really like the Kanta's, so i prefer to build a system around them. I know that at least with the Luxman L-507Z they work really really well on my space, and it's about 80% of what i'm looking for, so i know that can be done.
    My guess is that with the Luxman L-595A SE they will also work well, if not better, since that amp is supposed to be "warmer" sounding, however, as they do not have the LIFES implementation which i really enjoyed on the new Z series , and, since i am unable to listen to it prior to buying, it is still a very risky decision, that i'm not willing to take now.
    So with this, i will try to listen to the options i have mentioned in my previous posts. If i find one that really pleases me, perfect, if not, then i will probably have to increase my budget and go for the luxman L509Z when it releases or even the M-10X, if they are worthy, and give me exactly what i'm searching for soundwise.

    Of course that in this search i might end up listening to a speaker that really impresses me, turns this completely around and gets me to sell the Kanta's, but for now, that possibility is unlikely

  13. #13

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    Well, just to update this thread, i ended up biting the bullet and bought the Luxman L-595A SE. I'm hoping that i at least like it as much as the L-507Z, if for some reason that's not the case, worst case scenario i think the price i bought the L-595 gives me margin to at least hold it's value, specially with time, since this is a limited edition, so it's all good. I will get the amp tomorrow, really excited to hear it with the Kanta's and the UD-701N.

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2022
    Location
    France
    Posts
    16

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    Hi,
    I am interested on what you think of the couple Luxman 595 se with the Focal Kanta. Thanks.

  15. #15

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    It's a sublime match. Really happy with it so far.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2023
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    38

    Re: Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

    I'm thinking of buying the same setup. Do you ever get listening fatigue from the brightness of the focal?

AudioShark - The Best High End Audio Discussion forum.

AudioShark forum is a leading forum site for High End Audio Discussion, Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater System Discussion, Best Home Stereo System Discussion, Home Theater Installation Discussion etc.

The AudioShark forum was created for sharing the passion of high-end Audio. We have Audiophiles from all over the world participating and sharing their knowledge. From novice to experts, you will find a friendly environment for discussing about High End Audio, Stereo System, Home Theater System, Home Stereo System, Home Theater Installation, Amplifiers, Speakers, Subwoofers, Integrated System, Acoustic treatments & Digital Room Corrections and many more.

At AudioShark, we also have incorporated an exciting Marketplace where members can peruse terrific buys on used gear, as well as meet dealers and discuss the purchase of new gear.

We are as crazy about this hobby as you are! So come on in and join us! Audioshark.org the Friendliest Audio Forum!

Industry Participation Disclosure : The owner and administrator of Audioshark is the owner of Suncoast Audio LLC in Sarasota Florida. Suncoast Audio has a full brick and mortar presence in Sarasota with several great show rooms with many world class brands. More information can be found at http://www.suncoastaudio.com

Audioshark is a community of like minded individuals. Audioshark welcomes participation from all manufacturers and owners of all brands and products. It is our belief that online forums provide a community of like minded audiophiles and music lovers to encourage the growth of this wonderful hobby.

Sincerely,
The Audioshark.org Team

Amplifier for Focal Kanta Nº2 (Luxman L-595A SE vs 507Z or tube preamp)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •